Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Western Healthconnect

Support significant improvements in health care delivery and outcomes within the context of nonprofit, charitable ownership.

$1.2M
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$297k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20222024.

Housing & Shelter$2.3MHealth$1.2MPublic Benefit$300kHuman Services$50k
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $50k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $827k
  • $250k+1 grant · $297k
$150,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$137M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMMITTEE ON THE SHELTERLESS$296,927
ALLIANCE MEDICAL CENTER INC$200,000
CITY OF PETALUMA$190,000
PETALUMA HEALTH CENTER$150,000
COPPERTOWER FAMILY MEDICAL CENTER INC$127,363
REACH FOR HOME$109,200
MOTHERS CARE$50,000
LA FAMILIA SANA$49,940
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $109k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%REACH FOR HOME: $109k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

53%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.1M · 5 repeat orgs$1.8M to everyone else

5 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
2

Total granted

$2.1M
$1.5M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+587%

Still filing today

80%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $337k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24
HealthHousing & ShelterHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CO
    COMMITTEE ON THE SHELTERLESS
    3× · 2022–2024 · $735k · revenue +108%
  • ALLIANCE MEDICAL CENTER INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $315k · revenue +28%
  • PETALUMA HEALTH CENTER INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $190k · revenue +14%

Funded once

  • BH
    BURBANK HOUSINGSR CORPORATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $800k · revenue +587%
  • BH
    Burbank Housing Corporationgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $700k · revenue +286%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Community Medical Centers Inc

The organization provides primary medical, behavior health, and dental care to the population of san joaquin, and solano counties without regard to patients' ability to pay.

Health
2
Pomona Community Health Center

Pomona community health center's mission is to be the medical home for the underserved in our community by providing high quality preventive and primary care health services.

Health
3
Community Health Center of Snohomish County

Community health center of snohomish county (chc) provides our diverse communities with access to high quality, affordable primary health care.

Health
4
Sonoma Valley Community Health Center

To provide accessible, quality health care to those who need it, especially the underserved.

Unclassified
5
Marin Community Clinic

To improve the health of our patients and community by providing high quality, cost-effective, culturally sensitive, patient-centered health care.

Health
6
San Fernando Community Hospital

Provides primary care, oral health, and behavioral health care, including health education to the community without regard to the ability to pay for services.

Health
7
Asian Health Services

Asian Health Services (AHS) provides a continuum of medical care, mental health care, dental care and other healthcare services for all, including health education; perinatal services; behavioral health; family and youth services;…

Health
8
Peninsula Community Health Services of Alaska

Strengthening the community by providing accessible and affordable health care.

Health
9
Mendocino Community Health Clinic Inc

To provide the highest quality healthcare for everyone in our communities.

Health
10
Redwood Coast Medical Services Inc

Oriented community based primary care. to include but not limited to, a broad range of preventative health and dental services to residents and visitors within the coastal areas of northern california.

Health
11
South Central Family Health Center

To improve the quality of life for the diverse communities we serve providing affordable and comprehensive healthcare and education in a welcoming multi-cultural environment.

Health
12
East Valley Community Health Center Inc

East valley community health center's mission is to provide access to excellent health care while engaging and empowering our patients, employees and partners to improve their well-being and health of our communities.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Petaluma Health Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is Mother's Care Support. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

BURBANK HOUSINGSR CORPORATION — $800,000 · OtherBURBANK HOUSINGSR CORPORATIONCOMMITTEE ON THE SHELTERLESS — $735,265 · OtherCOMMITTEE ON THE SHELTERLESSCITY OF PETALUMA — $300,000 · OtherCITY OF PETALUMA+1 more — $49,940 · OtherHEALTHCARE FOUNDATION NORTHERN SONOMA COUNTY — $515,000 · HealthHEALTHCARE FOUNDATION NORTHERN SON…ALLIANCE MEDICAL CENTER INC — $315,000 · HealthALLIANCE MEDICAL CENTER INCPETALUMA HEALTH CENTER INC — $190,000 · HealthPETALUMA HEALTH CENTER INCCOPPERTOWER FAMILY MED CTR INC DBA ALEXANDER VALLEY HEALTHCARE — $127,363 · HealthCOPPERTOWER FAMILY MED CTR INC DBA…Mother's Care Support — $50,000 · HealthBurbank Housing Corporation — $700,000 · Housing & ShelterBurbank Housing Corp…REACH FOR HOME — $109,200 · Human Services
Other$1,885,205Health$1,197,363Housing & Shelter$700,000Human Services$109,200

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCOMMITTEE ON THE SHELTERLESS — $735,265 over 3y, 4.2% of budgetBurbank Housing Corporation — $700,000 over 1y, 7.0% of budgetHEALTHCARE FOUNDATION NORTHERN SONOMA COUNTY — $515,000 over 2y, 16% of budgetALLIANCE MEDICAL CENTER INC — $315,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetPETALUMA HEALTH CENTER INC — $190,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCOPPERTOWER FAMILY MED CTR INC DBA ALEXANDER VALLEY HEALTHCARE — $127,363 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetREACH FOR HOME — $109,200 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetLA FAMILIA SANA — $49,940 over 1y, 8.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sonoma County Community FoundationCA19.7× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sonoma County Community Foundation · Sonoma County Vintners Foundation · Bothin Foundation · East Bay Community Foundation · St Joseph Health Northern California LLC · Healthcare Foundation Northern Sonoma County · Redwood Credit Union Community Fund Inc · California Healthcare Foundation · Marin Community Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Western Healthconnect funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph