· Public charity
West Virginia University Research Corporation
To foster and support research at west virginia university (wvu) and to provide evaluation, development, patenting, management and marketing services for inventions by the faculty, staff, and students of wvu.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 68% of WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY RESEARCH CORPORATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 150 grants below total $30,295,953 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $34,299,951 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $4,003,998 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k10 grants · $73k
- $10k–50k52 grants · $1.3M
- $50k–250k64 grants · $7.4M
- $250k+24 grants · $21M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY | $7,455,756 |
| THE STRATAGEM GROUP LLC | $3,325,000 |
| MARSHALL UNIV RESEARCH CORP | $2,304,885 |
| INTRACK RADAR TECHNOLOGIES INC | $738,548 |
| CABIN CREEK HEALTH SYSTEMS INC | $632,882 |
| CAMC HEALTH EDUCATION & RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC | $611,385 |
| UNIV OF NOTRE DAME | $546,820 |
| GE VERNOVA OPERATIONS LLC | $522,500 |
| VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INST & STATE UNIV | $495,686 |
| MALACHITE TECHNOLOGIES INC | $421,555 |
| FLORIDA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC | $421,027 |
| UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII | $417,270 |
| UNIV OF TENNESSEE | $380,188 |
| WV SCHOOL OF OSTEOPATHIC MEDICINE | $362,051 |
| RHODE ISLAND HOSPITAL | $343,283 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $715k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +29% since the first grant, against +16% for the ones you funded once.
219 repeat relationships — 111 still active in FY2025, 108 since wound down; 33 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.0M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MUMARSHALL UNIVERSITY RESEARCH CORPORATION9× · 2017–2025 · $18M · revenue +94%
- CHCAMC HEALTH EDUCATION AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC9× · 2017–2025 · $6.3M · revenue +0%
- UOUniversity of Kentucky Research Foundation9× · 2017–2025 · $4.2M · revenue +66%
Funded once
- CRCOGNITIVE RESEARCH ENTERPRISES INCgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $1.5M · revenue ×25
- TMTHE MOSAIC GROUP INCone grant, 2023 · $325k
- GTGAMMA TECHNOLOGIES LLCone grant, 2023 · $211k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To foster and support research at west virginia university (wvu) and to provide evaluation, development, patenting, management and marketing services for inventions by the faculty, staff, and students of wvu.
To produce, in a humanistic tradition, health care professionals and biomedical knowledge that will enhance and extend the quality of life in our communities.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
The university of virginia investment management company (uvimco) is organized to invest funds on behalf of the rector and visitors of the university of virginia (the university or uva) and university-associated organizations (uaos).
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Primary functions are the coordination and delivery of health care resources and services, health care education for the hospital service area, long range analysis of health care needs and development of programs, and arranging for…
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Kentucky Research Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Morgantown Sober Living Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 46 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
157 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 157 of the 325 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MARSHALL UNIVERSITY RESEARCH CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds CAMC HEALTH EDUCATION AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds University of Kentucky Research Foundation ↗
- Who funds University of Notre Dame du Lac ↗
- Who funds FLORIDA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC ↗
- Who funds WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds CABIN CREEK HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds COGNITIVE RESEARCH ENTERPRISES INC ↗
- Who funds The Research Foundation for The State University of New York ↗
- Who funds GLENVILLE STATE COLLEGE RESEARCH CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds ELECTRIC POWER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds THE CENTER FOR RURAL HEALTH DEVELOPMENT INC ↗
- Who funds Massachusetts Institute of Technology ↗
- Who funds MOUNTAIN STATE OSTEOPATHIC POSTDOCTORAL TRAINING INSTITUTIONS INC ↗
- Who funds EASTERN AREA HEALTH EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds MaineHealth ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: National Collegiate Athletic Association · Claude Worthington Benedum Foundation · The Greater Kanawha Valley Foundation · American Chemical Society · West Virginia Primary Care Association Inc · The Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York · Washington University · Cornell University · Trustees of Boston University · Johns Hopkins University · University of Pittsburgh · Highmark Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization West Virginia University Research Corporation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology — 35% of income from government
- University of Delaware — 30% of income from government
- Max Planck Florida Corporation — 23% of income from government
- Boston Medical Center Corporation — 23% of income from government
- Johns Hopkins University — 12% of income from government
- Yale University — 12% of income from government
- Worcester Polytechnic Institute — 8% of income from government
- Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation — 7% of income from government
- President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
- Florida Institute of Technology Inc — 5% of income from government
- The Nemours Foundation — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.