Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

West Virginia Primary Care Association Inc

To assure accessible, high-quality and cost-effective health services for all west virginians, regardless of economic or social status, through the cultivation of financial, political and philanthropic relationships.

$296k
Granted FY2022
25
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$18k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2022 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 25 grants below total $255,720 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $296,421 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $40,701 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k16 grants · $126k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $130k
$9,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$4.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VALLEY HEALTH SYSTEMS INC$17,720
SHENANDOAH COMMUNITY HEALTH$14,000
COMMUNITY CARE OF WV$14,000
CABIN CREEK HEALTH SYSTEMS INC$14,000
COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS INC DBA ACCESS HEALTH$14,000
WOMENCARE INC DBA FAMILY CARE$14,000
LINCOLN COUNTY PRIMARY CARE CENTER INC DBA SOUTHERN WV HEALTH SYSTEM$14,000
CHANGE INC$14,000
NEW RIVER HEALTH ASSOCIATION INC$14,000
MONONGAHELA VALLEY ASSOCIATION OF HEALTH CENTERS INC$9,000
EA HAWSE HEALTH CENTER$9,000
VALLEY HEALTH CARE INC$9,000
BLUESTONE HEALTH ASSOCIATION INC$9,000
WIRT COUNTY HEALTH SERVICES ASSOCIATION INC DBA COPLIN$9,000
RAINELLE MEDICAL CENTER INC$9,000
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY22–22) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 18%. 59% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 18%WOMENCARE INC DBA FAMILY CARE: $14k → 10%SHENANDOAH COMMUNITY HEALTH: $14k → 11%CHANGE INC: $14k → 12%EA HAWSE HEALTH CENTER: $9k → 13%MONROE HEALTH CENTER: $8k → 15%PENDLETON COMMUNITY CARE: $6k → 15%MONONGAHELA VALLEY ASSOCIATION OF HEALTH CENTERS INC: $9k → 15%PRESTON-TAYLOR COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC: $8k → 16%VALLEY HEALTH CARE INC: $9k → 17%CABIN CREEK HEALTH SYSTEMS INC: $14k → 18%COMMUNITY CARE OF WV: $14k → 19%WIRT COUNTY HEALTH SERVICES ASSOCIATION INC DBA COPLIN: $9k → 19%ROANE COUNTY FAMILY HEALTH CARE INC: $6k → 19%VALLEY HEALTH SYSTEMS INC: $18k → 19%COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS INC DBA ACCESS HEALTH: $14k → 20%RITCHIE REGIONAL HEALTH CENTER: $9k → 20%BELINGTON MEDICAL CLINIC DBA BARBOUR COMMUNITY HEALTH ASSOCIATION: $8k → 20%RAINELLE MEDICAL CENTER INC: $9k → 20%BLUESTONE HEALTH ASSOCIATION INC: $9k → 21%MINNIE HAMILTON HEALTH SYSTEM: $9k → 22%CAMDEN ON GAULEY MEDICAL CENTER INC: $8k → 24%LINCOLN COUNTY PRIMARY CARE CENTER INC DBA SOUTHERN WV HEALTH SYSTEM: $14k → 24%WILLIAMSON HEALTH & WELLNESS CENTER: $6k → 31%TUG RIVER HEALTH ASSOCIATION INC: $6k → 38%NEW RIVER HEALTH ASSOCIATION INC: $14k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mountaineer Community Health Center

To provide primary medical care service in a rural community.

Health
2
Mountain Valleys Health Centers

We serve our rural communities with complete quality care and friendly customer service, providing exceptional healthcare for all.

—
3
Southwest Virginia Community Health Systems Inc

Provide comprehensive primary medical care to the communites served.

Health
4
Horizon Health Care Inc

Horizon health care, inc. provides rural communities with access to high-quality, affordable primary healthcare services.

Health
5
Valley Health Systems Inc

To provide quality healthcare to all individuals, emphasizing outreach to those who are underserved. valley health strives to ensure that quality healthcare is readily accessible to everyone and serves patients regardless of their ability…

Health
6
Muskingum Valley Health Center

To provide affordable, accessible, and quality healthcare.

Health
7
Valley Comprehensive Community Health Center Inc

Valley healthcare system shall improve our community's health by delivering the highest quality behavioral healthcare guided by our consumer's needs.

—
8
Blue Ridge Health Center Inc

Community health center

—
9
Belmont Professional Associates Inc

To improve the communitys health through the efficient provision, coordination, and integration of quality health services, health education, and research. To provide compassionate, quality health services according to the spiritual,…

—
10
Wayne County Healthy Communities

Providing access to quality primary health care for all.

Health
11
Carolina Family Health Centers Inc

Carolina Family Health Centers, Inc. provides accessible and affordable health care with excellence...where patients come FIRST

—
12
Beckley Health Right Inc

To provide primary care services at no cost to uninsured and underinsured low income residents of west virginia.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Care of West Virginia Inc and the most unlike its peers is Women's Care Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 43 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%0%<5yr12%0%5–10yr19%9%10–20yr15%9%20–35yr14%77%35–55yr21%5%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%0%<5yr12%0%5–10yr19%10%10–20yr15%10%20–35yr14%73%35–55yr21%6%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/25
the rest of the field
12%
506/4,081

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

03the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
21/24
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

VALLEY HEALTH SYSTEM — $17,720 · HealthVALLEY HEALTH SYSTEMWOMEN'S CARE CENTER INC — $14,000 · HealthWOMEN'S CARE CENTER INCSHENANDOAH VALLEY MEDICAL SYSTEM I — $14,000 · HealthSHENANDOAH VALLEY MEDICAL SYSTEM INew River Health Association Inc — $14,000 · HealthNew River Health Association IncLINCOLN COUNTY PRIMARY CARE CENTER INC — $14,000 · HealthLINCOLN COUNTY PRIMARY CARE CENTER INCRAINELLE MEDICAL CENTER INC — $9,000 · HealthWIRT COUNTY HEALTH SERVICES ASSOCIATION INC — $9,000 · HealthMINNIE HAMILTON HEALTH CARE CENTER INC — $9,000 · HealthRITCHIE COUNTY PRIMARY CARE ASSOC INC — $9,000 · HealthBLUESTONE HEALTH ASSOCIATION INC — $9,000 · HealthE A HAWSE HEALTH CENTER — $9,000 · HealthCAMDEN ON GAULEY MEDICAL CENTER INC — $8,000 · HealthBELINGTON COMMUNITY MEDICAL SERVICES ASSOCIATION INC — $8,000 · HealthPRESTON TAYLOR COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER CENTERS INC — $8,000 · Health+4 more — $22,000 · Health+4 moreCommunity Care of West Virginia Inc — $14,000 · OtherCommunity Care of West …COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS INC — $14,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEM…MONONGAHELA VALLEY ASSOC OF HEALTH CENTERS — $9,000 · OtherMONONGAHELA VALLEY ASSO…VALLEY HEALTH CARE INC — $9,000 · OtherVALLEY HEALTH CARE INCMONROE HEALTH CENTER — $8,000 · OtherMONROE HEALTH CENTERCABIN CREEK HEALTH CENTER INC — $14,000 · ReligionCHANGE INC — $14,000 · Employment
Health$173,720Other$54,000Religion$14,000Employment$14,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetVALLEY HEALTH SYSTEM — $17,720 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCommunity Care of West Virginia Inc — $14,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCABIN CREEK HEALTH CENTER INC — $14,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWOMEN'S CARE CENTER INC — $14,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSHENANDOAH VALLEY MEDICAL SYSTEM I — $14,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS INC — $14,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHANGE INC — $14,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNew River Health Association Inc — $14,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLINCOLN COUNTY PRIMARY CARE CENTER INC — $14,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRAINELLE MEDICAL CENTER INC — $9,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMONONGAHELA VALLEY ASSOC OF HEALTH CENTERS — $9,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetVALLEY HEALTH CARE INC — $9,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWIRT COUNTY HEALTH SERVICES ASSOCIATION INC — $9,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMINNIE HAMILTON HEALTH CARE CENTER INC — $9,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRITCHIE COUNTY PRIMARY CARE ASSOC INC — $9,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBLUESTONE HEALTH ASSOCIATION INC — $9,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetE A HAWSE HEALTH CENTER — $9,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAMDEN ON GAULEY MEDICAL CENTER INC — $8,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBELINGTON COMMUNITY MEDICAL SERVICES ASSOCIATION INC — $8,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPRESTON TAYLOR COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER CENTERS INC — $8,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTUG RIVER HEALTH ASSOCIATION INC — $5,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPENDLETON COMMUNITY CARE INC — $5,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWILLIAMSON HEALTH AND WELLNESS CENTER INC — $5,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROANE COUNTY FAMILY HEALTH CARE INC — $5,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

West Virginia Univers…Delta Dental Communit…American Cancer Socie…Direct ReliefParkersburg Area Comm…Claude Worthington Be…Highmark FoundationWest Virginia Allianc…Sisters of St Joseph …The Greater Kanawha V…Amazonsmile Foundation
West Virginia University Research CorporationWV36.6× affinity15 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: West Virginia University Research Corporation · Delta Dental Community Care Foundation · American Cancer Society Inc · Direct Relief · Parkersburg Area Community Foundation Inc (Previously Pacf Inc) · Claude Worthington Benedum Foundation · Highmark Foundation · West Virginia Alliance for Creative Health Solutions Inc · Sisters of St Joseph Charitable Fund Inc · The Greater Kanawha Valley Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization West Virginia Primary Care Association Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2022, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines