Skip to content

· Private foundation

Welsh Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$87k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Food & Nutrition$316kEducation$199kHousing & Shelter$159kHuman Services$139kInternational$54kEmployment$46kArts & Culture$14kHealth$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $70k
$15,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BEACON INTERFAITH HOUSING COLLABORATIVE$15,000
JEREMIAH PROGRAM$15,000
CRISO REY JESUIT HIGH SCHOOL$15,000
RISEN CHRIST CATHOLIC SCHOOL$15,000
HEIFER INTERNATIONAL$10,000
MIKE ROWE WORKS FOUNDATION$7,000
BLUE WATERS THEATRE COMPANY$5,000
GIRL SCOUTS RIVER VALLEYS$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $40k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SHARING AND CARING HANDS: $10k → 11%SHARING AND CARING HANDS: $10k → 11%SHARING AND CARING HANDS: $10k → 11%SHARING & CARING HANDS: $5k → 11%SHARING & CARING HANDS: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.0M · 18 repeat orgs$25k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
3

Total granted

$1.0M
$25k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+43%

Still filing today

61%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureFood & NutritionCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • M
    MATTER
    6× · 2018–2024 · $316k · revenue +173%
  • BI
    BEACON INTERFAITH HOUSING COLLABORATIVE
    8× · 2017–2025 · $114k · revenue +60%
  • JP
    JEREMIAH PROGRAM
    6× · 2020–2025 · $90k · revenue +120%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
  • BH
    BENEDICTINE HEALTH CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +43%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Leadership Matters Mn

Leadership matters mn is focused on advancing a policy agenda that places working minnesotans first. we support economic growth, job creation and equitable tax and education policies that will allow every minnesotan to thrive.

Education
2
Greater Twin Cities United Way

For 110 years, greater twin cities united way (united way), a nonprofit, has demonstrated that whenever there's a community need in the greater twin cities region, united way is there. united way's efforts continually evolve to respond to…

Philanthropy
3
Women's Project & Productions Inc

Wp theater is the nation's oldest and largest theater company dedicated to developing, producing, and promoting the work of women+ at every stage of their careers. for over four decades we have served as leaders of a global movement…

Arts & Culture
4
The Great Northern Winter Festival

The great northern celebrates our cold, creative winters through ten days of diverse programming that invigorate mind and body. in an era of changing climate that threatens our signature season, we seek to create community, inspire action,…

Arts & Culture
5
Milkweed Editions Inc

To identify, nurture and publish transformative literature, and build an engaged community around it.

Arts & Culture
6
Achieve Twin Cities

As one of the upper midwest's leading career and college readiness organizations, achieve twin cities rallies community support and delivers best-in-class programs to inspire and equip young people in minneapolis and saint paul, minnesota…

Youth Development
7
Minneapolis Saint Paul Regional Economic Development Partnership

The mission of the greater msp partnership is to accelerate regional competitiveness and inclusive economic growth through job creation, capital investment and execution of strategic initiatives. the partnership works to strengthen our…

Community Improvement
8
St Catherine University

We educate women to lead and influence. we educate at all degree levels through valuing and integrating the liberal arts and professional education within the catholic intellectual tradition, see schedule oemphasizing scholarly inquiry and…

Education
9
Women's Foundation of Minnesota

Women's Foundation of Minnesota is a statewide community foundation investing in ending systemic inequities and driving innovation for gender and racial justice. WFM applies an Intersectional Equity Framework inclusive of gender, race,…

Philanthropy
10
Park Square Theatre

To enrich the community by producing and presenting exceptional live theatre that touches the heart, engages the mind and delights the spirit.

—
11
Minnesota Business Partnership

The minnesota business partnership's mission is to maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans by ensuring that the state's economy remains strong, globally competitive and its prospects for growth bright by working with elected…

—
12
Housinglink

Connecting people to affordable rental homes, increasing choice and access for all.

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jeremiah Program; the most unlike its peers is Girl Scouts of Mn and Wi River Valleys Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
10/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CRISTO REY JESUIT HIGH SCHOOL: $116,500 · OtherCRISTO REY JESUIT HIGH SCHOOLRISEN CHRIST SCHOOL: $112,500 · OtherRISEN CHRIST SCHOOLBridging Inc: $32,000 · OtherBridging IncJEREMIAH HOUSE: $28,000 · OtherJEREMIAH HOUSEHEIFER INTERNATIONAL: $24,000 · OtherHEIFER INTERNATIONALST JOSEPH'S HOME FOR CHILDREN: $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $16,000 · OtherBLUE WATER THEATRE COMPANY: $15,000 · OtherGIRL SCOUTS OF MN AND WI RIVER VALLEYS INC: $15,000 · Other+6 more: $33,000 · Other+6 moreMATTER: $315,500 · Food & NutritionMATTERBEACON INTERFAITH HOUSING COLLABORATIVE: $114,000 · Community ImprovementBEACON INTER…JEREMIAH PROGRAM: $90,000 · Housing & ShelterJEREMIAH …MIKEROWEWORKS FOUNDATION: $53,000 · PhilanthropyHEIFER PROJECT INTERNATIONAL: $40,000 · InternationalSHARING AND CARING HANDS INC: $40,000 · Human Services
Other$412,000Food & Nutrition$315,500Community Improvement$114,000Housing & Shelter$90,000Philanthropy$53,000International$40,000Human Services$40,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMATTER: $315,500 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetBEACON INTERFAITH HOUSING COLLABORATIVE: $114,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetJEREMIAH PROGRAM: $90,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetMIKEROWEWORKS FOUNDATION: $53,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetHEIFER PROJECT INTERNATIONAL: $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSHARING AND CARING HANDS INC: $40,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetBridging Inc: $32,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF MN AND WI RIVER VALLEYS INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBLUE WATER THEATRE COMPANY: $15,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetBENEDICTINE HEALTH CENTER: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTWIN CITIES PUBLIC TELEVISION INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMINNESOTA PUBLIC RADIO AMERICAN PUBLIC MEDIA: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MATTER ↗
  • Who funds BEACON INTERFAITH HOUSING COLLABORATIVE ↗
  • Who funds JEREMIAH PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds MIKEROWEWORKS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HEIFER PROJECT INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds SHARING AND CARING HANDS INC ↗
  • Who funds Bridging Inc ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF MN AND WI RIVER VALLEYS INC ↗
  • Who funds BLUE WATER THEATRE COMPANY ↗
  • Who funds BENEDICTINE HEALTH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds TWIN CITIES PUBLIC TELEVISION INC ↗
  • Who funds MINNESOTA PUBLIC RADIO AMERICAN PUBLIC MEDIA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Richard M Schulze Family FoundationMN13.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · The Minneapolis Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Welsh Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Welsh Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Welsh Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph