Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Welsh Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$197k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$110k
Largest
01What you fund
0192% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Food & Nutrition$316kEducation$199kHousing & Shelter$159kHuman Services$139kInternational$54kEmployment$46kArts & Culture$14kHealth$10kOther$0
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $70k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $110k
$15,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MATTER$110,000
BEACON INTERFAITH HOUSING COLLABORATIVE$15,000
CRISO REY JESUIT HIGH SCHOOL$15,000
RISEN CHRIST CATHOLIC SCHOOL$15,000
JEREMIAH PROGRAM$15,000
HEIFER INTERNATIONAL$10,000
MIKE ROWE WORKS FOUNDATION$7,000
GIRL SCOUTS RIVER VALLEYS$5,000
BLUE WATERS THEATRE COMPANY$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–22, $40k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SHARING AND CARING HANDS: $10k → 11%SHARING AND CARING HANDS: $10k → 11%SHARING AND CARING HANDS: $10k → 11%SHARING & CARING HANDS: $5k → 11%SHARING & CARING HANDS: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$953k · 18 repeat orgs$25k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
3

Total granted

$953k
$25k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+43%

Still filing today

61%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureFood & NutritionCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • M
    MATTER
    6× · 2018–2024 · $316k · revenue +173%
  • BI
    BEACON INTERFAITH HOUSING COLLABORATIVE
    7× · 2017–2024 · $99k · revenue +60%
  • JP
    JEREMIAH PROGRAM
    5× · 2020–2024 · $75k · revenue +120%

Funded once

  • BH
    BENEDICTINE HEALTH CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +43%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Minnesota Business Partnership

The minnesota business partnership's mission is to maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans by ensuring that the state's economy remains strong, globally competitive and its prospects for growth bright by working with elected…

2
Leadership Matters Mn

Leadership matters mn is focused on advancing a policy agenda that places working minnesotans first. we support economic growth, job creation and equitable tax and education policies that will allow every minnesotan to thrive.

Education
3
Minneapolis Saint Paul Regional Economic Development Partnership

The mission of the greater msp partnership is to accelerate regional competitiveness and inclusive economic growth through job creation, capital investment and execution of strategic initiatives. the partnership works to strengthen our…

Community Improvement
4
MinnPost

MinnPost produces independent journalism to serve as a trusted guide for Minnesotans exploring the critical issues, challenges and opportunities facing our state.

Arts & Culture
5
Women's Foundation of Minnesota

Women's Foundation of Minnesota is a statewide community foundation investing in ending systemic inequities and driving innovation for gender and racial justice. WFM applies an Intersectional Equity Framework inclusive of gender, race,…

Philanthropy
6
The Great Northern Winter Festival

The great northern celebrates our cold, creative winters through ten days of diverse programming that invigorate mind and body. in an era of changing climate that threatens our signature season, we seek to create community, inspire action,…

Arts & Culture
7
Women's Project & Productions Inc

Wp theater is the nation's oldest and largest theater company dedicated to developing, producing, and promoting the work of women+ at every stage of their careers. for over four decades we have served as leaders of a global movement…

Arts & Culture
8
St Paul Transportation Management Organization

Move minnesota leads the movement for an equitable and sustainable transportation system that puts people first. we are passionate about connecting communities, ending the climate crisis, expanding access to jobs and resources, and…

Environment
9
Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation

Purpose: we inspire, advocate and invest to advance community visions. continued on sch o

Philanthropy
10
Minnesota Housing Partnership

Minnesota housing partnership (mhp) expands housing and community development opportunity by leading collaborative work to promote systems change and grow develoopment capacity.

11
Fresh Energy

Shape and drive bold policy solutions to achieve equitable carbon-neutral economies.

Environment
12
Housinglink

Connecting people to affordable rental homes, increasing choice and access for all.

Housing & Shelter

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jeremiah Program and the most unlike its peers is Girl Scouts of Mn and Wi River Valleys Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
11/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CRISTO REY JESUIT HIGH SCHOOL — $101,500 · OtherCRISTO REY JESUIT HIGH SCHOOLRISEN CHRIST SCHOOL — $97,500 · OtherRISEN CHRIST SCHOOLBridging Inc — $32,000 · OtherBridging IncJEREMIAH HOUSE — $28,000 · OtherJEREMIAH HOUSEST JOSEPH'S HOME FOR CHILDREN — $20,000 · OtherST JOSEPH'S HOME FOR CHILDRENIndividual grant recipient — $16,000 · OtherHEIFER INTERNATIONAL — $14,000 · Other+8 more — $53,000 · Other+8 moreMATTER — $315,500 · Food & NutritionMATTERBEACON INTERFAITH HOUSING COLLABORATIVE — $99,000 · Community ImprovementBEACON INTE…JEREMIAH PROGRAM — $75,000 · Housing & ShelterMIKEROWEWORKS FOUNDATION — $46,000 · PhilanthropyHEIFER PROJECT INTERNATIONAL — $40,000 · InternationalSHARING AND CARING HANDS INC — $40,000 · Human Services
Other$362,000Food & Nutrition$315,500Community Improvement$99,000Housing & Shelter$75,000Philanthropy$46,000International$40,000Human Services$40,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMATTER — $315,500 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetBEACON INTERFAITH HOUSING COLLABORATIVE — $99,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetJEREMIAH PROGRAM — $75,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMIKEROWEWORKS FOUNDATION — $46,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetHEIFER PROJECT INTERNATIONAL — $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSHARING AND CARING HANDS INC — $40,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetBridging Inc — $32,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetBENEDICTINE HEALTH CENTER — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF MN AND WI RIVER VALLEYS INC — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBLUE WATER THEATRE COMPANY — $10,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetTWIN CITIES PUBLIC TELEVISION INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMINNESOTA PUBLIC RADIO AMERICAN PUBLIC MEDIA — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MATTER
  • Who funds BEACON INTERFAITH HOUSING COLLABORATIVE
  • Who funds JEREMIAH PROGRAM
  • Who funds MIKEROWEWORKS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds HEIFER PROJECT INTERNATIONAL
  • Who funds SHARING AND CARING HANDS INC
  • Who funds Bridging Inc
  • Who funds BENEDICTINE HEALTH CENTER
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF MN AND WI RIVER VALLEYS INC
  • Who funds BLUE WATER THEATRE COMPANY
  • Who funds TWIN CITIES PUBLIC TELEVISION INC
  • Who funds MINNESOTA PUBLIC RADIO AMERICAN PUBLIC MEDIA

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Richard M Schulze Family FoundationMN13.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · The Minneapolis Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Welsh Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph