Skip to content
Weinand Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Weinand Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$35k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$21k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$1.4MRecreation & Sports$443kReligion$170kYouth Development$37kCommunity Improvement$29kHealth$17kCrime & Legal$11kArts & Culture$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $21k
$1,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY PARK PARENT TEACHERS ASSOCIATION$20,500
GUNS AND ROSES FOUNDATION$5,000
INTERFAITH FAMILY SERVICES$5,000
HIGHLAND PARK MIS HPMS PTO$1,500
MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING$1,000
US SKI AND SNOWBOARD FOUNDATION$1,000
UNIVERSITY PARK UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$350
UNIVERSITY PARK PRESCHOOL ASSOCIATION$250
UNIVERSITY PARK ELEMENTARY$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $14k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SALESMANSHIP CLUB CHARITABLE GOLF OF DALLAS INC: $2k → 14%INTERFAITH FAMILY SERVICES: $5k → 14%INTERFAITH FAMILY SERVICES: $5k → 14%THE HUMAN IMPACT: $1k → 14%THE HUMAN IMPACT: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.1M · 16 repeat orgs$48k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +38% since the first grant, against +31% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
16

Total granted

$2.1M
$40k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+31%

Still filing today

75%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CP
    CHI PSI EDUCATIONAL TRUST INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +162%
  • US
    UNITED STATES OLYMPIC AND PARALYMPIC FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $438k · revenue +111%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION
    6× · 2018–2024 · $224k · revenue +87%

Funded once

  • CH
    CHILDRENS HOSPITAL DALLAS
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
  • NT
    NORTH TEXAS CRIME STOPPERS
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • DS
    DALLAS SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA LEAGUE
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
2
University Corporate Research Park I Inc

To hold title and perform related functions in connection with a research park and innovation center in support of michigan state university research foundation.

—
3
University of Minnesota Foundation Investment Advisors

To provide the highest level of stewardship for university donors through professional management and oversight of the university of minnesota foundation's assets by creating a focused investment environment with clarity of purpose,…

Education
4
Park University

Park university's mission is to transform lives through accessible, student-centered, quality higher education.

Education
5
The University of TexasTexas a&M Investment Management Company

To generate superior long-term investment returns to support The University of Texas and Texas A&M University systems as they provide world-class teaching, push the boundaries of discovery, and achieve excellence in patient healthcare for…

Education
6
United States Olympic and Paralympic Committee

Empowering the competitive excellence and well-being of team usa athletes, championing the power of sport, and inspiring the nation.

Recreation & Sports
7
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
8
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
9
University of Virginia Investment Management Company

The university of virginia investment management company (uvimco) is organized to invest funds on behalf of the rector and visitors of the university of virginia (the university or uva) and university-associated organizations (uaos).

Education
10
University of Southern Mississippi Foundation

To build relationships with alumni and friends in order to secure private funds and other resources for the benefit of the university of southern mississippi (usm). the foundation receives, invests and distributes private gifts in support…

Education
11
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

—
12
Pacific University

A diverse and sustainable learning community dedicated to discovery and excellence in teaching, scholarship and practice, pacific university inspires students to think, care, create and pursue justice in our world.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Minnesota Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Great Investors Best Ideas Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
15/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHI PSI EDUCATIONAL TRUST INC: $1,089,841 · EducationCHI PSI EDUCATIONAL TRUST INCUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION: $224,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATIONUNIVERSITY PARK SCHOOL PARENT-TEACHER ASSOCIATION: $58,615 · Education+5 more: $5,500 · EducationUNITED STATES OLYMPIC AND PARALYMPIC FOUNDATION: $437,500 · Recreation & SportsUNITED STATES OLYMPIC A…+1 more: $1,000 · Recreation & SportsUNIVERSITY PARK UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $170,390 · OtherUNIVERSITY PA…GREAT INVESTORS BEST IDEAS FOUNDATION: $29,000 · OtherGREAT INVESTO…CHILDRENS HOSPITAL DALLAS: $10,000 · OtherNORTH TEXAS CRIME STOPPERS: $10,000 · Other+15 more: $30,702 · Other+15 moreCAPITAL FOR KIDS: $30,000 · Youth DevelopmentYOUNG LIFE: $6,000 · Youth DevelopmentALPHA NU TRUST FUND INC: $18,000 · PhilanthropyMINNESOTA STATE FAIR FOUNDATION: $2,500 · PhilanthropyINTERFAITH FAMILY SERVICES: $10,000 · Human ServicesTHE HUMAN IMPACT: $2,000 · Human ServicesSalesmanship Club Charitable Golf of Dallas Inc: $1,500 · Human ServicesDallas Museum of Art: $1,350 · Arts & Culture
Education$1,377,956Recreation & Sports$438,500Other$250,092Youth Development$36,000Philanthropy$20,500Human Services$13,500Arts & Culture$1,350

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHI PSI EDUCATIONAL TRUST INC: $1,089,841 over 8y, 9.9% of budgetUNITED STATES OLYMPIC AND PARALYMPIC FOUNDATION: $437,500 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION: $224,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY PARK SCHOOL PARENT-TEACHER ASSOCIATION: $58,615 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetCAPITAL FOR KIDS: $30,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetALPHA NU TRUST FUND INC: $18,000 over 4y, 14% of budgetINTERFAITH FAMILY SERVICES: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMINNESOTA STATE FAIR FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE HUMAN IMPACT: $2,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF PUGET SOUND: $1,900 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHIGHLAND PARK MIS-HPMS PTO: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSalesmanship Club Charitable Golf of Dallas Inc: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDallas Museum of Art: $1,350 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDePauw University: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUnited States Ski Team Foundation: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSouthern Methodist University: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPCA of Texas: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDONORSCHOOSEORG: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHI PSI EDUCATIONAL TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES OLYMPIC AND PARALYMPIC FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY PARK SCHOOL PARENT-TEACHER ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds CAPITAL FOR KIDS ↗
  • Who funds GREAT INVESTORS BEST IDEAS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ALPHA NU TRUST FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds INTERFAITH FAMILY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
  • Who funds MINNESOTA STATE FAIR FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE HUMAN IMPACT ↗
  • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF PUGET SOUND ↗
  • Who funds HIGHLAND PARK MIS-HPMS PTO ↗
  • Who funds Salesmanship Club Charitable Golf of Dallas Inc ↗
  • Who funds Dallas Museum of Art ↗
  • Who funds DePauw University ↗
  • Who funds United States Ski Team Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Southern Methodist University ↗
  • Who funds THE CHRIS MURZIN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SPCA of Texas ↗
  • Who funds DONORSCHOOSEORG ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Communities Foundatio…The Bank of America C…National Philanthropi…Donor Advised Charita…Natl Christian Charit…Fidelity Investments …American Online Givin…Amazonsmile Foundation
Communities Foundation of Texas IncTX16.2× affinity6 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Weinand Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Weinand Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Weinand Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home