Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Weinand Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$293k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Education$1.4MRecreation & Sports$443kReligion$170kYouth Development$37kCommunity Improvement$29kHealth$17kCrime & Legal$11kArts & Culture$10kOther$0
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $131k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $150k
$10,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
US OLYMPIC AND PARALYMPIC FOUNDATION$150,000
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION$44,000
CHI PSI EDUCATIONAL TRUST INC$30,500
UNIVERSITY PARK UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$25,300
UNIVERSITY PARK PARENT TEACHERS ASSOCIATION$11,265
CHILDRENS HOSPITAL DALLAS$10,000
CAPITAL FOR KIDS$10,000
INTERFAITH FAMILY SERVICES$5,000
DALLAS SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA LEAGUE$5,000
MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING$1,000
MN STATE FAIR FOUNDATION$930
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SALESMANSHIP CLUB CHARITABLE GOLF OF DALLAS INC: $2k → 14%INTERFAITH FAMILY SERVICES: $5k → 14%THE HUMAN IMPACT: $1k → 14%THE HUMAN IMPACT: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.1M · 15 repeat orgs$45k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +38% since the first grant, against +31% for the ones you funded once.

15 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
14

Total granted

$2.1M
$25k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+31%

Still filing today

73%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CP
    CHI PSI EDUCATIONAL TRUST INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +162%
  • US
    UNITED STATES OLYMPIC AND PARALYMPIC FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $438k · revenue +111%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION
    6× · 2018–2024 · $224k · revenue +87%

Funded once

  • NT
    NORTH TEXAS CRIME STOPPERS
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • US
    UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER
    one grant, 2023 · $4k
  • MS
    MINNESOTA STATE FAIR FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $3k · revenue +251%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
2
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
3
University of Minnesota Foundation Investment Advisors

To provide the highest level of stewardship for university donors through professional management and oversight of the university of minnesota foundation's assets by creating a focused investment environment with clarity of purpose,…

Education
4
University Corporate Research Park I Inc

To hold title and perform related functions in connection with a research park and innovation center in support of michigan state university research foundation.

5
Dallas College Foundation Inc

Dallas college foundation enhances the level of achievement and excellence of dallas college by providing scholarships, eliminating barriers that prevent students from attending and graduating, and supporting innovation.

Education
6
University of Southern Mississippi Foundation

To build relationships with alumni and friends in order to secure private funds and other resources for the benefit of the university of southern mississippi (usm). the foundation receives, invests and distributes private gifts in support…

Education
7
Park University

Park university's mission is to transform lives through accessible, student-centered, quality higher education.

Education
8
The University of TexasTexas a&M Investment Management Company

To generate superior long-term investment returns to support The University of Texas and Texas A&M University systems as they provide world-class teaching, push the boundaries of discovery, and achieve excellence in patient healthcare for…

Education
9
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

10
Pacific University

A diverse and sustainable learning community dedicated to discovery and excellence in teaching, scholarship and practice, pacific university inspires students to think, care, create and pursue justice in our world.

Education
11
University of Virginia Investment Management Company

The university of virginia investment management company (uvimco) is organized to invest funds on behalf of the rector and visitors of the university of virginia (the university or uva) and university-associated organizations (uaos).

Education
12
Harvard Club of Washington Dc

To inform and enrich the intellectual lives of 20,000 alumni of harvard university in the washington, dc area and to assist harvard university with respect to applicants and undergraduates from the dc area.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Minnesota Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Great Investors Best Ideas Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
15/19
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CHI PSI EDUCATIONAL TRUST INC — $1,089,841 · EducationCHI PSI EDUCATIONAL TRUST INCUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION — $224,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION+5 more — $42,115 · EducationUNITED STATES OLYMPIC AND PARALYMPIC FOUNDATION — $437,500 · Recreation & SportsUNITED STATES OLYMPIC A…UNIVERSITY PARK UNITED METHODIST CHURCH — $170,040 · OtherUNIVERSITY PA…GREAT INVESTORS BEST IDEAS FOUNDATION — $29,000 · OtherGREAT INVESTO…NORTH TEXAS CRIME STOPPERS — $10,000 · OtherCHILDRENS HOSPITAL DALLAS — $10,000 · Other+12 more — $24,202 · Other+12 moreCAPITAL FOR KIDS — $30,000 · Youth DevelopmentYOUNG LIFE — $6,000 · Youth DevelopmentALPHA NU TRUST FUND INC — $18,000 · PhilanthropyMINNESOTA STATE FAIR FOUNDATION — $2,500 · PhilanthropyINTERFAITH FAMILY SERVICES — $5,000 · Human ServicesTHE HUMAN IMPACT — $2,000 · Human ServicesSalesmanship Club Charitable Golf of Dallas Inc — $1,500 · Human ServicesDallas Museum of Art — $1,350 · Arts & Culture
Education$1,355,956Recreation & Sports$437,500Other$243,242Youth Development$36,000Philanthropy$20,500Human Services$8,500Arts & Culture$1,350

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCHI PSI EDUCATIONAL TRUST INC — $1,089,841 over 8y, 9.9% of budgetUNITED STATES OLYMPIC AND PARALYMPIC FOUNDATION — $437,500 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION — $224,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY PARK SCHOOL PARENT-TEACHER ASSOCIATION — $38,115 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetCAPITAL FOR KIDS — $30,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetALPHA NU TRUST FUND INC — $18,000 over 4y, 14% of budgetYOUNG LIFE — $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetINTERFAITH FAMILY SERVICES — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMINNESOTA STATE FAIR FOUNDATION — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE HUMAN IMPACT — $2,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF PUGET SOUND — $1,900 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSalesmanship Club Charitable Golf of Dallas Inc — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDallas Museum of Art — $1,350 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSouthern Methodist University — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDePauw University — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPCA of Texas — $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDONORSCHOOSEORG — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHI PSI EDUCATIONAL TRUST INC
  • Who funds UNITED STATES OLYMPIC AND PARALYMPIC FOUNDATION
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY PARK SCHOOL PARENT-TEACHER ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds CAPITAL FOR KIDS
  • Who funds GREAT INVESTORS BEST IDEAS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds ALPHA NU TRUST FUND INC
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE
  • Who funds INTERFAITH FAMILY SERVICES
  • Who funds MINNESOTA STATE FAIR FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THE HUMAN IMPACT
  • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF PUGET SOUND
  • Who funds Salesmanship Club Charitable Golf of Dallas Inc
  • Who funds Dallas Museum of Art
  • Who funds Southern Methodist University
  • Who funds DePauw University
  • Who funds THE CHRIS MURZIN FOUNDATION
  • Who funds SPCA of Texas
  • Who funds DONORSCHOOSEORG

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Communities Foundation of Texas IncTX16.2× affinity6 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Weinand Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph