Skip to content
Web Maddox Trust Xxxxx0008 at a glance

· Private foundation

Web Maddox Trust Xxxxx0008

Its FY2026 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$245k
Granted FY2026still arriving
5
Grants FY2026still arriving
1
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0173% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$1.2MEducation$158kEnvironment$458Other$0
02FY2026 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $225k
$50,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$5.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FORT WORTH SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA$75,000
FORT WORTH MUSEUM OF SCIENCE$50,000
FORT WORTH OPERA ASSOCIATION INC$50,000
Individual grant recipient$50,000
DRC Solutions$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–26) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%FORT WORTH SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $125k → 11%ARTIST OUTREACH INC: $25k → 14%FORT WORTH SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $100k → 11%FORT WORTH SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $100k → 11%FORT WORTH SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $75k → 11%FORT WORTH SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $74k → 11%PERFORMING ARTS FORT WORTH INC: $50k → 11%FORT WORTH ZOOLOGICAL: $74k → 11%FORT WORTH ZOOLOGICAL: $50k → 11%FORT WORTH ZOOLOGICAL: $50k → 11%FORT WORTH ZOOLOGICAL: $50k → 11%FORT WORTH ZOOLOGICAL: $50k → 11%FORT WORTH ZOOLOGICAL: $50k → 11%FORT WORTH ZOOLOGICAL: $50k → 11%FORT WORTH ZOOLOGICAL: $26k → 11%FORT WORTH ZOOLOGICAL: $25k → 11%TEXAS CENTER FOR ARTS AND ACADEMICS: $25k → 11%HILL SCHOOL OF FORT WORTH INC: $25k → 11%HILL SCHOOL OF FORT WORTH INC: $23k → 11%FORT WORTH MUSEUM OF SCIENCE: $125k → 11%FORT WORTH MUSEUM OF SCIENCE: $100k → 11%FORT WORTH OPERA ASSOCIATION INC: $100k → 11%FORT WORTH MUSEUM OF SCIENCE: $75k → 11%FORT WORTH MUSEUM OF SCIENCE: $75k → 11%FORT WORTH OPERA ASSOCIATION INC: $50k → 11%FORT WORTH OPERA ASSOCIATION INC: $50k → 11%FORT WORTH OPERA ASSOCIATION INC: $50k → 11%FORT WORTH OPERA ASSOCIATION INC: $50k → 11%FORT WORTH MUSEUM OF SCIENCE: $50k → 11%TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $100k → 11%FORT WORTH MUSEUM OF SCIENCE: $50k → 11%TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $10k → 11%FORT WORTH OPERA ASSOCIATION INC: $50k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.9M · 6 repeat orgs$120k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2026, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
4

Total granted

$1.9M
$100k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+1%
+2%

Still filing today

67%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
Arts & CultureEducationCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FW
    FORT WORTH MUSEUM OF SCIENCE
    6× · 2021–2026 · $475k
  • FW
    FORT WORTH SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION
    5× · 2019–2026 · $474k · revenue +1%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    9× · 2018–2026 · $425k

Funded once

  • PA
    PERFORMING ARTS FORT WORTH INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $50k · revenue +40%
  • TC
    TEXAS CENTER FOR ARTS ACADEMICS
    one grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue 0%
  • AO
    Artist Outreach Inc
    one grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue +2%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Tx Performing Chinese Arts
—
2
Fort Worth Early Music

Public performance of baroque classical music (17th, 18th, and 19th century) using period appropriate instruments.

Arts & Culture
3
Kimbell Art Foundation
Arts & Culture
4
TexArts Association for Visual & Performing Arts

TexARTS is an arts education and performance destination that builds character, professionalism, and careers. Its mission is to cultivate a thriving arts community by exposing all people to the visual and performing arts. TexARTS prepares…

Arts & Culture
5
Chesterton Academy of Fort Worth

To inspire and influence the culture in Fort Worth by joyfully engaging our students with the classics, which are the foundation of Western civilization and point to the most important historical even of humanity, the Incarnation of our…

Education
6
The Chamber Music Society of Fort Worth Incorporated

To promote and present the highest quality chamber music for our city and region, reflecting innovation, creativity in programming, and selection of superior musical artists. To build an informed audience for chamber music, now and in the…

—
7
American Baroque Opera Company

American baroque opera company operates in the state of texas for the primary purpose of furthering the appreciaton of music, particularly opera, for the general public. american baroque opera company performs select operas throughout the…

Arts & Culture
8
Fort Worth Country Day School Inc

The mission of fort worth country day school is to foster the intellectual, physical, emotional and ethical development of capable students through an academically rigorous college preparatory program that integrates the arts and athletics.

Education
9
The Texas Supremacy of Music and Arts Conservatory

Provides music seminars, education, programs and summer camp for underprivileged youth.

Youth Development
10
American Festival for the Arts

Founded in 1993, American Festival for the Arts (AFA) provides high quality community-based music education programs and performance opportunities designed primarily for youth and, through its concert series and outreach, seeks to broaden…

Arts & Culture
11
Texas Cowboy Hall of Fame Inc
Arts & Culture
12
North Texas Performing Arts

The mission of North Texas Performing Arts is to develop the character of youth through quality performing arts education and family entertainment. Our vision is to make our programs accessible and desirable to our North Texas families.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fort Worth Symphony Orchestra Association; the most unlike its peers is Texas Christian University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FORT WORTH SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION: $474,000 · Arts & CultureFORT WORTH SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATIONFort Worth Opera Association Inc: $350,000 · Arts & CultureFort Worth Opera Association IncPERFORMING ARTS FORT WORTH INC: $50,000 · Arts & CulturePERFORMING ARTS FORT WORTH INC+2 more: $50,000 · Arts & Culture+2 moreFORT WORTH MUSEUM OF SCIENCE: $475,375 · OtherFORT WORTH MUSEUM OF SCIENCEIndividual grant recipient: $425,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+1 more: $458 · OtherTEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $110,000 · EducationTHE HILL SCHOOL OF FORT WORTH INC: $47,831 · EducationDAY RESOURCE CENTER FOR HOMELESS: $20,000 · Community Improvement
Arts & Culture$924,000Other$900,833Education$157,831Community Improvement$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFORT WORTH SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION: $474,000 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetFort Worth Opera Association Inc: $350,000 over 6y, 6.1% of budgetTEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $110,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPERFORMING ARTS FORT WORTH INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE HILL SCHOOL OF FORT WORTH INC: $47,831 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetTEXAS CENTER FOR ARTS ACADEMICS: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetArtist Outreach Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 6.5% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE FORT WORTH NATURE CENTER & REFUGE INC: $458 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Thomas M Helen McKee …Fifth Avenue Foundati…Ann L Rhodes and Caro…Amon G Carter Foundat…Bnsf Railway Foundati…Communities Foundatio…Robert D and Alma Mor…Adeline & George McQu…Wm & Catherine Bryce …Crystelle Waggoner Ch…The Alcon Foundation …Sid W Richardson Foun…
Thomas M Helen McKee & John P Ryan Fo John P Ryan Foundation IncTX19.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Thomas M Helen McKee & John P Ryan Fo John P Ryan Foundation Inc · Fifth Avenue Foundation · Ann L Rhodes and Carol Greene Rhodes · Amon G Carter Foundation · Bnsf Railway Foundation · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Robert D and Alma Moreton Foundation · Adeline & George McQueen Foundation Xxxxx1007 · Wm & Catherine Bryce Memorial Fund Xxxxx3001 · Crystelle Waggoner Charitable Trust · The Alcon Foundation Inc · Sid W Richardson Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Web Maddox Trust Xxxxx0008 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Web Maddox Trust Xxxxx0008. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Web Maddox Trust Xxxxx0008’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home