Skip to content
We Are One World Foundation Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Community foundation

We Are One World Foundation Inc

We are a local nonprofit passionate about good food and nutrition education.

$960k
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Religion$928kHealth$778kAnimals$455kEducation$380kHuman Services$310kArts & Culture$165kInternational$151kPhilanthropy$81kOther$0
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k7 grants · $145k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $560k
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$50,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$108k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHURCHOME$250,000
HOLY TRINITY MONTESSORI$160,000
THE ONSITE FOUNDATION$150,000
SHELDRICK WILDLIFE TRUST USA$100,000
LOVE ONE INTERNATIONAL$50,000
ANGEL ARMIES INC DBA FOR OTHERS COLLECTIVE$50,000
BELMONT UNIVERSITY$50,000
PORTER'S CALL$25,000
YOUNG LIFE$25,000
HOME STREET HOME MINISTRIES$25,000
CALVARY CHURCH BRENTWOOD$20,000
BLACKBERRY FAMILY CHURCH$20,000
MOTHER TO MOTHER$20,000
CHEEKWOOD$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $315k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 27% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%ANGEL ARMIES INC DBA OTHERS COLLECTIVE: $50k → 13%ANGEL ARMIES INC DBA FOR OTHERS COLLECTIVE: $175k → 4%ANGEL ARMIES INC DBA FOR OTHERS COLLECTIVE: $50k → 4%PORTER'S CALL: $5k → 4%MOTHER TO MOTHER: $20k → 14%MOTHER TO MOTHER: $15k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
NY
CA
CO
TN
NC
DC
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.9M · 14 repeat orgs$295k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +74% since the first grant, against +12% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
8

Total granted

$2.9M
$215k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+74%
+12%

Still filing today

79%
88%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $80k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’22’23’24
EducationHealthHuman ServicesInternationalAnimalsReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TD
    THE DAVID SHELDRICK WILDLIFE TRUST USA INC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $455k · revenue +254%
  • HT
    HOLY TRINITY MONTESSORI INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $320k · revenue +34%
  • FO
    FOR OTHERS COLLECTIVE INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $275k · revenue +178%

Funded once

  • MC
    Memphis Center For Reproductive Health Incgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue +307%
  • EA
    EMPOWERS AFRICA INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue +250%
  • AC
    AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue -80%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Allosource

Inspired by the gift of donation from our communities, allosource responsibly provides innovative cellular and tissue allografts to advance patient healing.

Health
2
Mercy Health

Mercy Health will provide assistance, support and direction to all of the health care institutions and activities operated and maintained by its Subsidiaries. The mission of Mercy Health in performing these activities shall be to provide a…

—
3
Good Samaritan Hospital Foundation

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

—
4
Acmg Foundation for Genetic and Genomic Medicine

Support the american college of medical genetics and genomics' (acmg) educational mission to "translate genes into health" by raising funds to attract the next generation of medical geneticists and genetic counselors, to sponsor important…

—
5
National Committee for Quality Assurance

Our mission: to improve the quality of health care.our vision: better health care. better choices. better health.

Health
6
Uncompahgre Combined Clinics

To provide quality, cost-effective, accessible, and affordable healthcare to the community.

Health
7
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
8
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
9
University Hospital & Clinics Inc

The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.

Health
10
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
11
Uchicago Medicine Network Inc

Uchicago medicine network, inc. supports and encourages health and human service by providing support, directly or indirectly to ingalls memorial hospital, the university of chicago medical center, and other related tax-exempt…

Health
12
Arbor Research Collaborative for Health

Arbor research collaborative for health is committed to improving patient care through research that shapes medical policies and practice. in particular, arbor research conducts health outcomes research on chronic disease and end-stage…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Community Foundation of Middle Tennessee Inc; the most unlike its peers is Blackberry Family Church. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
17/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHURCHOME: $640,000 · OtherCHURCHOMEPOSSIBILITIES INC: $375,000 · OtherPOSSIBILITIES INCCALVARY CHAPEL BRENTWOOD: $133,000 · OtherCALVARY CHAPEL BRENTWOODHOME STREET HOME MINISTRIES: $120,000 · OtherHOME STREET HOME MINISTRIESMemphis Center For Reproductive Health Inc: $50,000 · Other+6 more: $111,300 · Other+6 moreHOLY TRINITY MONTESSORI INC: $320,164 · EducationHOLY TRINITY MONTES…UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION: $100,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF CALIF…LOVE ONE INTERNATIONAL: $75,725 · EducationLOVE ONE INTERNATIO…Belmont University: $50,000 · EducationBelmont University+1 more: $10,000 · EducationFOR OTHERS COLLECTIVE INC: $275,000 · Human ServicesFOR OTHERS COLLE…PORTERS CALL: $155,145 · Human ServicesPORTERS CALLMOTHER TO MOTHER INC: $35,000 · Human ServicesMOTHER TO MOTHER…THE DAVID SHELDRICK WILDLIFE TRUST USA INC: $455,000 · AnimalsTHE DAVID SHELD…EVERY MOTHER COUNTS: $100,225 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $87,500 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $25,100 · HealthTHE V FOUNDATION: $15,000 · HealthEMPOWERS AFRICA INC: $50,000 · InternationalGLOBAL AIDS INTERFAITH ALLIANCE (GAIA): $25,000 · InternationalTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF MIDDLE TENNESSEE INC: $71,110 · Philanthropy
Other$1,429,300Education$555,889Human Services$465,145Animals$455,000Health$227,825International$75,000Philanthropy$71,110

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE DAVID SHELDRICK WILDLIFE TRUST USA INC: $455,000 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetPOSSIBILITIES INC: $375,000 over 5y, 60% of budgetHOLY TRINITY MONTESSORI INC: $320,164 over 4y, 6.1% of budgetFOR OTHERS COLLECTIVE INC: $275,000 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetPORTERS CALL: $155,145 over 4y, 8.4% of budgetEVERY MOTHER COUNTS: $100,225 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $87,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLOVE ONE INTERNATIONAL: $75,725 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF MIDDLE TENNESSEE INC: $71,110 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMemphis Center For Reproductive Health Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetEMPOWERS AFRICA INC: $50,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetBelmont University: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMOTHER TO MOTHER INC: $35,000 over 2y, 4.2% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $31,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $25,100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSILOAM HEALTH: $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetGLOBAL AIDS INTERFAITH ALLIANCE (GAIA): $25,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetBlackberry Family Church: $20,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetTHE V FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNETWORK FOR GOOD: $10,300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHEEKWOOD BOTANICAL GARDEN AND MUSEUM OF ART: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF NASHVILLE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Servant FoundationRaymond James Charita…The Community Foundat…Gs Donor Advised Phil…National Philanthropi…Renaissance Charitabl…American Endowment Fo…Morgan Stanley Global…Vanguard Charitable E…Donor Advised Charita…Natl Christian Charit…Paypal Charitable Giv…
Servant FoundationKS17.3× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Servant Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The Community Foundation of Middle Tennessee Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization We Are One World Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from We Are One World Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to We Are One World Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to We Are One World Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on We Are One World’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home