Skip to content
Plinth

· Community foundation

We Are One World Foundation Inc

We are a local nonprofit passionate about good food and nutrition education.

$960k
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192024.

Religion$928kHealth$778kAnimals$455kEducation$380kHuman Services$310kArts & Culture$165kInternational$151kPhilanthropy$81kOther$0
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k7 grants · $145k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $560k
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$50,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$108k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHURCHOME$250,000
HOLY TRINITY MONTESSORI$160,000
THE ONSITE FOUNDATION$150,000
SHELDRICK WILDLIFE TRUST USA$100,000
LOVE ONE INTERNATIONAL$50,000
BELMONT UNIVERSITY$50,000
ANGEL ARMIES INC DBA FOR OTHERS COLLECTIVE$50,000
PORTER'S CALL$25,000
HOME STREET HOME MINISTRIES$25,000
YOUNG LIFE$25,000
BLACKBERRY FAMILY CHURCH$20,000
MOTHER TO MOTHER$20,000
CALVARY CHURCH BRENTWOOD$20,000
CHEEKWOOD$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $315k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 27% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%ANGEL ARMIES INC DBA OTHERS COLLECTIVE: $50k → 13%ANGEL ARMIES INC DBA FOR OTHERS COLLECTIVE: $175k → 4%ANGEL ARMIES INC DBA FOR OTHERS COLLECTIVE: $50k → 4%PORTER'S CALL: $5k → 4%MOTHER TO MOTHER: $20k → 14%MOTHER TO MOTHER: $15k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
NY
CA
CO
TN
NC
DC
GA

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.9M · 14 repeat orgs$295k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +74% since the first grant, against +12% for the ones you funded once.

14 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
8

Total granted

$2.9M
$215k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+74%
+12%

Still filing today

79%
88%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $80k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’22’23’24
EducationHealthHuman ServicesInternationalAnimalsReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TD
    THE DAVID SHELDRICK WILDLIFE TRUST USA INC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $455k · revenue +192%
  • HT
    HOLY TRINITY MONTESSORI INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $320k · revenue +34%
  • FO
    FOR OTHERS COLLECTIVE INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $275k · revenue +178%

Funded once

  • MC
    Memphis Center For Reproductive Health Incgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue +220%
  • EA
    EMPOWERS AFRICA INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue +250%
  • AC
    AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue -80%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Allosource

Inspired by the gift of donation from our communities, allosource responsibly provides innovative cellular and tissue allografts to advance patient healing.

Health
2
Mercy Health

Mercy Health will provide assistance, support and direction to all of the health care institutions and activities operated and maintained by its Subsidiaries. The mission of Mercy Health in performing these activities shall be to provide a…

3
Good Samaritan Hospital Foundation

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

4
Acmg Foundation for Genetic and Genomic Medicine

Support the american college of medical genetics and genomics' (acmg) educational mission to "translate genes into health" by raising funds to attract the next generation of medical geneticists and genetic counselors, to sponsor important…

5
National Committee for Quality Assurance

Our mission: to improve the quality of health care.our vision: better health care. better choices. better health.

Health
6
Uncompahgre Combined Clinics

To provide quality, cost-effective, accessible, and affordable healthcare to the community.

Health
7
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

8
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
9
University Hospital & Clinics Inc

The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.

Health
10
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
11
Uchicago Medicine Network Inc

Uchicago medicine network, inc. supports and encourages health and human service by providing support, directly or indirectly to ingalls memorial hospital, the university of chicago medical center, and other related tax-exempt…

Health
12
Arbor Research Collaborative for Health

Arbor research collaborative for health is committed to improving patient care through research that shapes medical policies and practice. in particular, arbor research conducts health outcomes research on chronic disease and end-stage…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Community Foundation of Middle Tennessee Inc and the most unlike its peers is Blackberry Family Church. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyIndependent K-12 SchoolsHealth Access Advocacy and …Environmental Conservation …Community FoundationsFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Cancer Support ServicesCommunity FoundationsPolicy Research and AdvocacyPregnancy Support ServicesOrchestra and Ensemble Perf…Developmental Disabilities …Christian Missionary Organi…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%9%<5yr14%0%5–10yr18%17%10–20yr17%39%20–35yr11%17%35–55yr21%17%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%14%<5yr14%0%5–10yr18%26%10–20yr17%43%20–35yr11%10%35–55yr21%8%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 9% of your grantees by number, and just 14% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/27
the rest of the field
13%
5,292/40,963

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
16/23
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CHURCHOME — $640,000 · OtherCHURCHOMEPOSSIBILITIES INC — $375,000 · OtherPOSSIBILITIES INCCALVARY CHAPEL BRENTWOOD — $133,000 · OtherCALVARY CHAPEL BRENTWOODHOME STREET HOME MINISTRIES — $120,000 · OtherHOME STREET HOME MINISTRIESMemphis Center For Reproductive Health Inc — $50,000 · Other+6 more — $111,300 · Other+6 moreHOLY TRINITY MONTESSORI INC — $320,164 · EducationHOLY TRINITY MONTES…UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION — $100,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF CALIF…LOVE ONE INTERNATIONAL — $75,725 · EducationLOVE ONE INTERNATIO…Belmont University — $50,000 · EducationBelmont University+1 more — $10,000 · EducationFOR OTHERS COLLECTIVE INC — $275,000 · Human ServicesFOR OTHERS COLLE…PORTERS CALL — $155,145 · Human ServicesPORTERS CALLMOTHER TO MOTHER INC — $35,000 · Human ServicesMOTHER TO MOTHER…THE DAVID SHELDRICK WILDLIFE TRUST USA INC — $455,000 · AnimalsTHE DAVID SHELD…EVERY MOTHER COUNTS — $100,225 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $87,500 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $25,100 · HealthTHE V FOUNDATION — $15,000 · HealthEMPOWERS AFRICA INC — $50,000 · InternationalGLOBAL AIDS INTERFAITH ALLIANCE (GAIA) — $25,000 · InternationalTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF MIDDLE TENNESSEE INC — $71,110 · Philanthropy
Other$1,429,300Education$555,889Human Services$465,145Animals$455,000Health$227,825International$75,000Philanthropy$71,110

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE DAVID SHELDRICK WILDLIFE TRUST USA INC — $455,000 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetPOSSIBILITIES INC — $375,000 over 5y, 60% of budgetHOLY TRINITY MONTESSORI INC — $320,164 over 4y, 6.1% of budgetFOR OTHERS COLLECTIVE INC — $275,000 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetPORTERS CALL — $155,145 over 4y, 8.4% of budgetEVERY MOTHER COUNTS — $100,225 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION — $100,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $87,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLOVE ONE INTERNATIONAL — $75,725 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF MIDDLE TENNESSEE INC — $71,110 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMemphis Center For Reproductive Health Inc — $50,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetEMPOWERS AFRICA INC — $50,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetBelmont University — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMOTHER TO MOTHER INC — $35,000 over 2y, 4.2% of budgetYOUNG LIFE — $31,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $25,100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSILOAM HEALTH — $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetGLOBAL AIDS INTERFAITH ALLIANCE (GAIA) — $25,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetBlackberry Family Church — $20,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetTHE V FOUNDATION — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNETWORK FOR GOOD — $10,300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHEEKWOOD BOTANICAL GARDEN AND MUSEUM OF ART — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF NASHVILLE — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Servant FoundationKS17.3× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Servant Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The Community Foundation of Middle Tennessee Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization We Are One World Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to We Are One World Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to We Are One World Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph