Skip to content
Wayne Thiebaud Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Wayne Thiebaud Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$5.6M
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$2.4M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$19MEnvironment$4.5MPhilanthropy$40kEducation$7kFood & Nutrition$2kCivil Rights$2k
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
  • $250k+4 grants · $5.6M
$900,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$280M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JAN SHREM AND MARIA MANETTI SHREM MUSEUM OF ART UC DAVIS$2,422,700
FINE ARTS MUSEUMS OF SAN FRANCISCO$2,000,000
BEYELER MUSEUM AG$900,000
FINE ART MUSEUMS OF SAN FRANCISCO$250,000
SACRAMENTO REGION COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$10,000
CROCKER ART MUSEUM$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 76% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%NEW YORK STUDIO SCHOOL: $1k → 17%THE OXBOW SCHOOL: $1k → 9%LAGUNA ART MUSEUM: $1.4M → 10%OAKLAND MUSEUM OF CALIFORNIA: $1k → 10%FINE ARTS MUSEUMS OF SAN FRANCISCO: $2.0M → 10%CAPITAL PUBLIC RADIO: $1k → 12%CATAMARAN LITERARY READER: $1k → 13%LEONARDO DICAPRIO FOUNDATION: $4.5M → 14%MANETTI SHREM MUSEUM UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS: $10k → 16%SOFT POWER HEALTH: $1k → 9%THE BUFFALO FINE ARTS ACADEMY DBA ALBRIGHT-KNOX ART GALLERY: $1k → 13%LAGUNA ART MUSEUM: $50k → 10%FINE ART MUSEUMS OF SAN FRANCISCO: $1.2M → 10%PENCE GALLERY: $5k → 16%LAGUNA ART MUSEUM: $41k → 10%FINE ART MUSEUMS OF SAN FRANCISCO: $250k → 10%CROCKER ART MUSEUM: $4.5M → 12%PENCE GALLERY: $2k → 16%PIERPONT MORGAN LIBRARY: $1.9M → 17%LAGUNA ART MUSEUM: $25k → 10%FINE ARTS MUSEUMS OF SAN FRANCISCO: $80k → 10%CROCKER ART MUSEUM: $569k → 12%LAGUNA ART MUSEUM: $25k → 10%SAN FRANCISCO MUSEUM OF MODERN ART: $350k → 10%CROCKER ART MUSEUM: $50k → 12%LAGUNA COLLEGE OF ART DESIGN: $5k → 10%CROCKER ART MUSEUM: $43k → 12%CROCKER ART MUSEUM: $20k → 12%JAN SHREM AND MARIA MANETTI SHREM MUSEUM OF ART UC DAVIS: $2.4M → 16%CROCKER ART MUSEUM: $10k → 12%UC DAVIS - LECTURE IN THE THEORY PRACTICE AND CRITICISM OF PAINTING DRAWI: $2.3M → 16%AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ARTS AND LETTERS: $3k → 17%UC DAVIS - LECTURE IN THE THEORY PRACTICE AND CRITICISM OF PAINTING DRAWI: $500k → 16%AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ARTS AND LETTERS: $3k → 17%ELLIOTT FOUTS GALLERY: $4k → 12%UC DAVIS: $50k → 16%SACRAMENTO REGION COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10k → 12%UC DAVIS - SHREM MUSEUM OF ART FUND: $25k → 16%SACRAMENTO REGION COMMUNITY FOUNDATION - FRED BALL MEMORIAL FUND: $10k → 12%UC DAVIS - SHREM MUSEUM OF ART FUND: $25k → 16%SACRAMENTO REGION COMMUNITY FOUNDATION - FRED BALL MEMORIAL FUND: $10k → 12%UC DAVIS - SHREM MUSEUM OF ART FUND: $25k → 16%SACRAMENTO HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $10k → 12%SACRAMENTO REGION COMMUNITY FOUNDATION - FRED BALL MEMORIAL FUND: $10k → 12%KVIE: $3k → 12%KVIE: $3k → 12%NATHANIAL S COLLEY SR CIVIL RIGHTS COALITION: $2k → 12%SACRAMENTO BEE ART DIVISION: $3k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

56%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$13M · 17 repeat orgs$10M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +40% since the first grant, against +27% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
25

Total granted

$13M
$6.9M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+27%

Still filing today

65%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 40% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3.3M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CO
    CORPORATION OF THE FINE ARTS MUSEUMS
    2× · 2018–2024 · $2.1M · revenue +6%
  • LA
    LAGUNA ART MUSEUM
    5× · 2017–2021 · $1.6M · revenue +46% · 57% of their budget
  • PA
    PENCE ART GALLERY
    5× · 2017–2021 · $10k · revenue +88%

Funded once

  • LD
    LEONARDO DICAPRIO FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2018 · $4.5M · revenue -100%
  • TP
    The Pierpont Morgan Librarygraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $1.9M · revenue +53%
  • SF
    SAN FRANCISCO MUSEUM OF MODERN ART
    one grant, 2022 · $350k · revenue +14%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
California Institute of Contemporary Art
—
2
San Jose Museum of Art Association

Nurture empathy and connection by engaging communities with socially relevant contemporary art

Arts & Culture
3
Art Explorium
—
4
Kadist Collection Manager Inc
Arts & Culture
5
Henry E Huntington Library and Art Gallery

The huntington library, art museum, and botanical gardens shares its world-renowned collections to support scholarship, foster learning, inspire creativity, and offer transformative experiences for diverse audiences.

Arts & Culture
6
Clyfford Still Museum

Home to the art and legacy of the american painter clyfford still, we invite all to explore the potential of individual creative endeavor.

Arts & Culture
7
International Academy of Fine Art

The florence acadamy of art was founed in 1991 by daniel graves (see schedule o for details).

International
8
Munson-Williams-Proctor Arts Institute

Munson-williams-proctor arts institute (mwpai) is a fine arts center dedicated to serving diverse audiences by advancing the appreciation, understanding, and enjoyment of the arts. the art institute aims to promote interest and…

Arts & Culture
9
Philadelphia Museum of Art

The philadelphia museum of art - in partnership with the city, the region, and art museums around the globe - seeks to preserve, enhance, interpret, and extend the reach of its great collection in particular, and the visual arts in…

Arts & Culture
10
San Diego Museum of Art

To inspire, educate and cultivate curiosity through great works of art.

Arts & Culture
11
Museum Associates

To serve the public through the collection, conservation, exhibition and interpretation of significant works of art from a broad range of cultures and historical periods, and through translation of these collections into meaningful…

Arts & Culture
12
Fisher Art Foundation
Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Laguna Art Museum; the most unlike its peers is Nathaniel S Colley. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/28
Grantees still filing
20/28
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LEONARDO DICAPRIO FOUNDATION: $4,500,000 · OtherLEONARDO DICAPRIO FOUNDATIONUC DAVIS - LECTURE IN THE THEORY PRACTICE AND CRITICISM OF PAINTING DRAWI: $2,760,000 · OtherUC DAVIS - LECTURE IN THE THEORY PRACTICE AND CRITICISM OF …JAN SHREM AND MARIA MANETTI SHREM MUSEUM OF ART UC DAVIS: $2,422,700 · OtherJAN SHREM AND MARIA MANETTI SHREM MUSEUM OF ART UC DAVISFINE ART MUSEUMS OF SAN FRANCISCO: $1,425,000 · OtherFINE ART MUSEUMS OF SAN FRANCISCOBEYELER MUSEUM AG: $900,000 · OtherBEYELER MUSEUM AG+17 more: $175,000 · OtherCROCKER ART MUSEUM ASSOCIATION: $5,191,570 · Arts & CultureCROCKER ART MUSEUM ASSOCIATIONCORPORATION OF THE FINE ARTS MUSEUMS: $2,080,000 · Arts & CultureCORPORATION OF THE FINE ARTS MUSEUMSLAGUNA ART MUSEUM: $1,580,125 · Arts & CultureLAGUNA ART MUSEUMSAN FRANCISCO MUSEUM OF MODERN ART: $350,000 · Arts & Culture+12 more: $28,150 · Arts & CultureThe Pierpont Morgan Library: $1,910,000 · EducationThe Pierp…+5 more: $10,000 · EducationSacramento Region Community Foundation: $40,000 · Philanthropy
Other$12,182,700Arts & Culture$9,229,845Education$1,920,000Philanthropy$40,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCROCKER ART MUSEUM ASSOCIATION: $5,191,570 over 6y, 30% of budgetLEONARDO DICAPRIO FOUNDATION: $4,500,000 over 1y, 9.6% of budgetCORPORATION OF THE FINE ARTS MUSEUMS: $2,080,000 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetThe Pierpont Morgan Library: $1,910,000 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetLAGUNA ART MUSEUM: $1,580,125 over 5y, 57% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO MUSEUM OF MODERN ART: $350,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSacramento Region Community Foundation: $40,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetPENCE ART GALLERY: $9,500 over 5y, 1.6% of budgetKVIE INC: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLAGUNA COLLEGE OF ART & DESIGN: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN ACADEMY OF ARTS AND LETTERS: $5,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNEW YORK STUDIO SCHOOL: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHREEPENNY REVIEW: $3,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Edible Schoolyard Project dba The Alice Waters Institute: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetKEMPER MUSEUM OPERATING FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCAPITAL PUBLIC RADIO FDBA KXPR/KXJZ INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOAKLAND MUSEUM OF CALIFORNIA: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCartoon Art Museum of California: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCATAMARAN LITERARY READER: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCALIFORNIA COLLEGE OF THE ARTS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetODC THEATER: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGRABHORN INSTITUTE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNATIONAL ACADEMY OF DESIGN: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Orange County Communi…Ibm International Fou…The San Francisco Fou…The Franklin K & Sand…The Andy Warhol Found…The James Irvine Foun…ImpactassetsincVanguard Charitable E…Morgan Stanley Global…National Philanthropi…American Endowment Fo…The Bank of America C…
Orange County Community FoundationCA16.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Orange County Community Foundation · Ibm International Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · The Franklin K & Sandra K Yee Foundation · The Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts Inc · The James Irvine Foundation · Impactassetsinc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Wayne Thiebaud Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Wayne Thiebaud Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 45 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Wayne Thiebaud’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home