· Private foundation
Wayne Thiebaud Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
- $250k+4 grants · $5.6M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| JAN SHREM AND MARIA MANETTI SHREM MUSEUM OF ART UC DAVIS | $2,422,700 |
| FINE ARTS MUSEUMS OF SAN FRANCISCO | $2,000,000 |
| BEYELER MUSEUM AG | $900,000 |
| FINE ART MUSEUMS OF SAN FRANCISCO | $250,000 |
| SACRAMENTO REGION COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| CROCKER ART MUSEUM | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 76% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +40% since the first grant, against +27% for the ones you funded once.
17 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 40% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3.3M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- COCORPORATION OF THE FINE ARTS MUSEUMS2× · 2018–2024 · $2.1M · revenue +6%
- LALAGUNA ART MUSEUM5× · 2017–2021 · $1.6M · revenue +46% · 57% of their budget
- PAPENCE ART GALLERY5× · 2017–2021 · $10k · revenue +88%
Funded once
- LDLEONARDO DICAPRIO FOUNDATIONone grant, 2018 · $4.5M · revenue -100%
- TPThe Pierpont Morgan Librarygraduatedone grant, 2019 · $1.9M · revenue +53%
- SFSAN FRANCISCO MUSEUM OF MODERN ARTone grant, 2022 · $350k · revenue +14%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Nurture empathy and connection by engaging communities with socially relevant contemporary art
The huntington library, art museum, and botanical gardens shares its world-renowned collections to support scholarship, foster learning, inspire creativity, and offer transformative experiences for diverse audiences.
Home to the art and legacy of the american painter clyfford still, we invite all to explore the potential of individual creative endeavor.
The florence acadamy of art was founed in 1991 by daniel graves (see schedule o for details).
Munson-williams-proctor arts institute (mwpai) is a fine arts center dedicated to serving diverse audiences by advancing the appreciation, understanding, and enjoyment of the arts. the art institute aims to promote interest and…
The philadelphia museum of art - in partnership with the city, the region, and art museums around the globe - seeks to preserve, enhance, interpret, and extend the reach of its great collection in particular, and the visual arts in…
To inspire, educate and cultivate curiosity through great works of art.
To serve the public through the collection, conservation, exhibition and interpretation of significant works of art from a broad range of cultures and historical periods, and through translation of these collections into meaningful…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Laguna Art Museum and the most unlike its peers is Nathaniel S Colley. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 42 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CROCKER ART MUSEUM ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds LEONARDO DICAPRIO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CORPORATION OF THE FINE ARTS MUSEUMS ↗
- Who funds The Pierpont Morgan Library ↗
- Who funds LAGUNA ART MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds SAN FRANCISCO MUSEUM OF MODERN ART ↗
- Who funds Sacramento Region Community Foundation ↗
- Who funds PENCE ART GALLERY ↗
- Who funds KVIE INC ↗
- Who funds LAGUNA COLLEGE OF ART & DESIGN ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ARTS AND LETTERS ↗
- Who funds THREEPENNY REVIEW ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK STUDIO SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds CAPITAL PUBLIC RADIO FDBA KXPR/KXJZ INC ↗
- Who funds The Edible Schoolyard Project dba The Alice Waters Institute ↗
- Who funds KEMPER MUSEUM OPERATING FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION ↗
- Who funds NATHANIEL S COLLEY ↗
- Who funds CATAMARAN LITERARY READER ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA COLLEGE OF THE ARTS ↗
- Who funds GRABHORN INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds Cartoon Art Museum of California ↗
- Who funds ODC THEATER ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL ACADEMY OF DESIGN ↗
- Who funds SACRAMENTO HISTORY ALLIANCE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Orange County Community Foundation · Ibm International Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · The Franklin K & Sandra K Yee Foundation · The Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts Inc · The James Irvine Foundation · Impactassetsinc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Wayne Thiebaud Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.