Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Waterman Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$385k
Granted FY2017
46
Grants FY2017
7
States reached
$250k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of Waterman Family Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2017, the last year Waterman Family Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 26 organizations, $385k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

26
17
1
18
1
19
1
20
0
21
0
22
0
24
0
25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Philanthropy$1.3MReligion$854kCivil Rights$18kArts & Culture$13kHealth$10kHuman Services$10kInternational$10kScience & Tech$10kOther$0
02FY2017 · 46 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2017

  • Under $10k43 grants · $81k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $53k
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$1,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$2.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TEMPLE BETH EL$250,000
FIDELITY INVESTMENT CHARITABLE GIFT$43,394
DISCOVERY CENTER$10,000
CENTER THEATRE GROUP$9,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB$5,250
SOUTHERN POVERTY CENTER$5,000
ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE$5,000
CITY OF HOPE$5,000
SIMON WEISENTHAL CENTER$5,000
SOVA FOOD BANK$5,000
AMER JEWISH WORLD SERVICE$3,500
FEEDING AMERICA$3,000
DIRECT RELIEF INTERNATIONAL$2,500
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS USA$2,500
ALZHEIMER ASSOCIATION$2,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–17, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 67% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%CASA PACIFICA: $1k → 10%WOMEN IN NEED: $1k → 17%TOBERMAN NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER: $500 → 14%GUIDE DOGS OF AMERICA: $500 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Us Middle East Project Inc

The organization's mission is to engage in non partisan analysis of u.s. foreign policy in the middle east, with special emphasis on the middle east peace process, and to present policymakers in the united states, in the region and in the…

International
2
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
3
The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum

Chartered by a unanimous act of congress, the museum is america's national institution for the documentation, study, interpretation, and education of holocaust history and serves as our country's memorial to the victims of the holocaust.…

Arts & Culture
4
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
5
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
6
Committee to Protect Journalists Inc

The committee to protect journalists promotes press freedom worldwide and defends the right of journalists to report the news safely and without fear of reprisal. cpj ensures the free flow of news and commentary by taking action wherever…

Civil Rights
7
Middle East Media and Research Institute Inc

The middle east media research institute (memri) explores the middle east through its media, providing timely translations from arabic, farsi, urdu, pashtu, and turkish media and publishing original analysis of political, ideological,…

International
8
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
9
Management Sciences for Health Inc

(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.

International
10
The Population Council Inc

We generate ideas, produce evidence, and design solutions to improve the lives of underserved populations around the world. we take a multidisciplinary, intergenerational, life-cycle approach that contributes to (see schedule o)four global…

International
11
MRIGlobal

To improve the lives of people through innovative scientific and engineering research.

Science & Tech
12
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Simon Wiesenthal Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is Chrysalis Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyDog Rescue and Rehabilitati…Affordable Housing Developm…Hospital & Healthcare Found…Performing Arts Organizatio…Jewish Philanthropic Organi…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number23%0%<5yr15%4%5–10yr20%8%10–20yr18%27%20–35yr12%27%35–55yr13%35%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value23%0%<5yr15%39%5–10yr20%0%10–20yr18%0%20–35yr12%59%35–55yr13%1%55yr+

The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/28
the rest of the field
14%
11,586/82,972

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/26
Grantees still filing
19/26
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND — $1,276,616 · Community ImprovementFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUNDTEMPLE BETH EL — $850,000 · OtherTEMPLE BETH ELFIDELITY INVESTMENT CHARITABLE GIFT — $43,394 · Other+29 more — $53,350 · Other+29 moreCENTER THEATRE GROUP OF LOS ANGELES — $9,000 · Arts & CultureSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC — $7,000 · Arts & CultureALLIANCE FOR MIDDLE EAST PEACE INC — $1,000 · Arts & CultureDIRECT RELIEF — $2,500 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $2,500 · InternationalAMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC — $1,000 · InternationalJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC — $1,000 · InternationalOPERATION SMILE INC — $500 · InternationalChildren's Hospital Los Angeles — $2,500 · HealthNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY — $1,500 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC — $1,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $500 · HealthANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE — $5,000 · Civil RightsFeeding America — $3,000 · Food & Nutrition
Community Improvement$1,276,616Other$946,744Arts & Culture$17,000International$7,500Health$5,500Civil Rights$5,000Food & Nutrition$3,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND — $1,276,616 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDISCOVERY CENTER DBA FRESNO DISCOVERY CENTER — $10,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetCENTER THEATRE GROUP OF LOS ANGELES — $9,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC — $7,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Los Angeles — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOMEN IN NEED INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALLIANCE FOR MIDDLE EAST PEACE INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH WORLD WATCH — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCasa Pacifica Centers for Children & Families — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION SMILE INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAssistance League of San Pedro-South Bay — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTOBERMAN NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH GEN INC — $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA11.6× affinity8 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Waterman Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Waterman Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Waterman Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2017, released 2017. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph