Skip to content
Washington State Community Action Partnership at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Washington State Community Action Partnership

WASHINGTON STATE COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP works to build healthy communities and eliminate poverty through a unified network of community action agencies across washington state.

$483k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$168k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$1.3MCommunity Improvement$1.2MPublic Benefit$84kHousing & Shelter$52kPublic Safety & Disaster$48kCivil Rights$9kInternational$6k
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $46k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $436k
$50,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$714k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WESTSIDE BABY$167,567
BENTON FRANKLIN COMM ACTION COMMITTEE$60,557
LOWER COLUMBIA COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL$58,296
RURAL ALASKA COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM INC$50,000
COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP ASSOCIATION OF IDAHO$50,000
COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF OREGON$50,000
KIDVANTAGE$25,000
NATIONAL COMMUNITY ACTION FOUNDATION$21,085
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $1.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%WESTSIDE BABY: $168k → 9%CAC OF LEWIS MASON & THURSTON COUNTIES: $6k → 9%CHELAN-DOUGLAS CAC: $13k → 9%KITSAP COMMUNITY RESOURCES: $42k → 10%WASHINGTON GORGE ACTION PROGRAMS: $10k → 10%BENTON FRANKLIN COMM ACTION COMMITTEE: $61k → 11%OLYMPIC COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAMS: $54k → 11%COMMUNITY ACTION OF SKAGIT COUNTY: $6k → 11%OPPORTUNITY COUNCIL: $7k → 12%RURAL RESOURCES COMMUNITY ACTION: $18k → 13%LOWER COLUMBIA COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL: $184k → 13%OIC OF WASHINGTON: $17k → 17%OKANOGAN COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL: $16k → 17%COASTAL CAP: $6k → 18%COMMUNITY ACTION CENTER WHITMAN: $52k → 20%WESTSIDE BABY: $168k → 9%BENTON FRANKLIN COMM ACTION COMMITTEE: $20k → 11%LOWER COLUMBIA COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL: $58k → 13%OIC OF WASHINGTON: $11k → 17%WESTSIDE BABY: $39k → 9%OKANOGAN COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION CONCIL: $7k → 17%BYRD BARR PLACE: $11k → 9%EL CENTRO DE LA RAZA: $9k → 9%MULTI SERVICE CENTER: $7k → 9%KIDVANTAGE: $25k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.8M · 10 repeat orgs$409k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +17% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
19

Total granted

$2.8M
$384k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
0%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesCommunity ImprovementSocial SciencePublic Safety & DisasterFood & NutritionHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CA
    COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF OREGON
    9× · 2017–2025 · $658k · revenue +179%
  • RA
    RURAL ALASKA COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM
    9× · 2017–2025 · $553k · revenue +22%
  • WESTSIDE BABY
    3× · 2023–2025 · $375k · revenue +4%

Funded once

  • OC
    OLYMPIC COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAMS
    one grant, 2024 · $54k · revenue 0%
  • CA
    Community Action Centergraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $52k · revenue +52%
  • CC
    CARLTON COMPLEX LONG TERM RECOVERY GROUP
    one grant, 2021 · $48k · revenue -78%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Muskegon-Oceana Community Action Partnership Inc

Through dedicated staff and community partnerships we provide services, resources, education and advocacy to improve the quality of life for all residents of muskegon and oceana counties.

—
2
Mid-Columbia Community Action Council

To alleviate the causes and conditions of poverty in Wasco, Hood River, and Sherman Counties. The purpose of MCCAC shall be the promotion of self sufficiency in families and individuals within the low income economic ranges in the three…

—
3
Community Action Partnership of Middle Alabama Inc

Providing low income individuals home energy assistance and providing emergency assitance as needed

—
4
Northwest Community Action Inc

Our mission is to stimulate a focusing of all available resources upon the goal of enabling area low-income families and individuals of all ages to attain skills, knowledge, and motivations, and secure the opportunities needed for them to…

Human Services
5
Clatsop Community Action

Clatsop community action, inc. (cca) is an oregon nonprofit corporation whose mission is to assist low-income individuals and families meet housing, energy, food and other basic living needs in the clatsop county area of oregon. cca…

—
6
Rainier Beach Cummunity Empowerment Coalition

Rainier Beach Action Coalition is a grassroot, Black-led organization devoted to locally driven development. It promotes quality education, living wage jobs, affordable transportation and housing, and building community capacity in…

Community Improvement
7
Community Action Commission of Belmont County

Community assistance

Human Services
8
Washita Valley Community Action Council

To assist individuals and families in our communities through public and private partnerships to improve the quality of their lives by minimizing the effects of poverty, promoting self-sufficiency and advocating for social change.

Human Services
9
Community Action Agency of Butte County Inc

To improve the economic security and well-being of low-income residents of Butte County and our surrounding service area through diverse housing, human service programs and community collaborations.

—
10
South Central Community Action Partnership Inc

To provide a wide range of services in an effort to help improve the quality of life for people with an economic disadvantage.

—
11
Community Action Commission of Fayette County

Administers grants and contracts to help the lives of those individuals who fall below the poverty level.

—
12
Community Action Agency of Oklahoma City & Oklahoma/Canadian Counties

To promote the self-sufficiency of the socially, economically, and culturally disadvantaged citizens of oklahoma and canadian counties and to eliminate the paradox of poverty among these citizens by opening to everyone the opportunity to…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rural Resources Community Action; the most unlike its peers is Kidvantage. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
30/30
Grantees still filing
17/30
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WESTSIDE BABY: $374,999 · Human ServicesWESTSIDE BABYLOWER COLUMBIA COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL: $242,723 · Human ServicesLOWER COLUMBIA COMMUNITY ACTION COU…BENTON-FRANKLIN COMMUNITY ACTION COMMITT: $80,985 · Human ServicesBENTON-FRANKLIN COMMUNITY ACTION CO…OLYMPIC COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAMS: $54,461 · Human ServicesOLYMPIC COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAMSCommunity Action Center: $51,948 · Human ServicesKITSAP COMMUNITY RESOURCES: $41,501 · Human Services+13 more: $169,894 · Human Services+13 moreCOMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP ASSOCIATION OF IDAHO INC: $700,854 · OtherCOMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP …NATIONAL COMMUNITY ACTION FOUNDATION INC: $104,670 · OtherNATIONAL COMMUNITY ACTION FOU…NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE INC: $28,969 · Other+1 more: $7,994 · OtherCOMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF OREGON: $658,329 · Social ScienceCOMMUNITY ACTION PARTNE…RURAL ALASKA COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM: $553,422 · Community ImprovementRURAL ALASKA COMMUNIT…NONPROFIT ASSOCIATION OF WASHINGTON: $30,975 · Community ImprovementMETROPOLITAN DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL: $24,909 · Community ImprovementCARLTON COMPLEX LONG TERM RECOVERY GROUP: $48,052 · Public Safety & DisasterBLUE MOUNTAIN ACTION COUNCIL: $25,139 · Food & NutritionSolid Ground Washington: $6,445 · Housing & Shelter
Human Services$1,016,511Other$842,487Social Science$658,329Community Improvement$609,306Public Safety & Disaster$48,052Food & Nutrition$25,139Housing & Shelter$6,445

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP ASSOCIATION OF IDAHO INC: $700,854 over 9y, 30% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF OREGON: $658,329 over 9y, 5.0% of budgetRURAL ALASKA COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM: $553,422 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetWESTSIDE BABY: $374,999 over 3y, 3.8% of budgetLOWER COLUMBIA COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL: $242,723 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetNATIONAL COMMUNITY ACTION FOUNDATION INC: $104,670 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetBENTON-FRANKLIN COMMUNITY ACTION COMMITT: $80,985 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetOLYMPIC COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAMS: $54,461 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCARLTON COMPLEX LONG TERM RECOVERY GROUP: $48,052 over 1y, 6.0% of budgetNONPROFIT ASSOCIATION OF WASHINGTON: $30,975 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE INC: $28,969 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetOPPORTUNITIES INDUSTRIALIZATION CENTER OF WASHINGTON: $27,907 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBLUE MOUNTAIN ACTION COUNCIL: $25,139 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMETROPOLITAN DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL: $24,909 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOKANOGAN COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL INC: $22,711 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetRURAL RESOURCES COMMUNITY ACTION: $18,306 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHELAN-DOUGLAS COMMUNITY ACTION COU: $12,911 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBYRD BARR PLACE: $10,932 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWASHINGTON GORGE ACTION PROGRAMS: $10,100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEL CENTRO DE LA RAZA: $9,345 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHWEST COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP: $7,994 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetOPPORTUNITY COUNCIL: $7,136 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMULTI-SERVICE CENTER: $6,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL OF LEWIS MASON & THURSTON COUNTIES: $6,488 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSolid Ground Washington: $6,445 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION OF SKAGIT COUNTY: $6,385 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOASTAL COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM: $6,173 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Northwest Harvest EmmInatai FoundationMedina FoundationSeattle FoundationHarvest Against HungerSecond Harvest Inland…Puget Sound Energy Fo…The Albertsons Compan…Food LifelineUmpqua Bank Charitabl…The Norcliffe Foundat…Employees Community F…
Northwest Harvest EmmWA29.8× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Northwest Harvest Emm · Inatai Foundation · Medina Foundation · Seattle Foundation · Harvest Against Hunger · Second Harvest Inland Northwest · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · The Albertsons Companies Foundation · Food Lifeline · Umpqua Bank Charitable Foundation · The Norcliffe Foundation · Employees Community Fund of the Boeing Company

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Washington State Community Action Partnership funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Washington State Community Action Partnership. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 73%
  • Community Action Partnership of Oregon: 73% of income from government
  • Neighborhood House Inc: 16% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Washington State Community Action Partnership’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home