Skip to content

California · Private foundation

Warsh-Mott Legacy

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.2M
Granted FY2022
25
Grants FY2022
21
Organizations funded FY2022
10%
First-time grantees FY2022
Read the full brief

Read this first · the figures below need context

56% of Warsh-Mott Legacy’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Tides Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 34 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2022, the last year Warsh-Mott Legacy named its own grantees at scale: 20 organizations, $1M. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

31
’17
30
’18
17
’19
19
’20
13
’21
20
’22
35
’23
35
’24
34
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

Median grant, FY2022
$45,000
Largest grant, FY2022
$100,000
Organizations funded a year
15 to 36
FY2017 to FY2022
States reached, FY2022
6
Total assets, FY2022
$51M
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2022, 10% of the organizations Warsh-Mott Legacy funded were first-time grantees, receiving 12% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $130k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22
Food & NutritionEnvironmentInternationalCivil RightsPublic BenefitCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY202221$1.1M10%
FY202115$837k40%
FY202020$1.1M55%
FY201923$1.2M26%
FY201835$1.7M26%
FY201736$1.6Mn/a
98% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$6.3MCivil Rights$2.7MEnvironment$2.6MPublic Benefit$1.5MFood & Nutrition$1.2MInternational$677kCommunity Improvement$521kEducation$415kOther$0

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
VT
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
SD
CA
CO
MO
MD
AZ
NM
NC
DC
HI
GA
TX

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 91 grantees
All grantees of Warsh-Mott Legacy by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Friends of Action Group on Erosion Technology and Concentration$755,040553%
Government Accountability Project$600,00076%
Public Citizen Foundation Inc$465,00031%
Center for Constitutional Rights$460,00041%
Global Exchange$365,00055%
William J Brennan Center for Justice Inc$350,00080%
Sierra Club Foundation$330,00050%
Center for International Environmental Law Inc$300,00053%
Institute for Agriculture & Trade Policy$280,00057%
Partnershipforciviljusticefund$250,000430%
Center for Food Safety$250,00042%
Native Movement$240,00031%
Constitutional Accountability Center$225,00052%
American Constitution Society for Law & Policy$225,00051%
Xerces Society Inc$180,00041%
Defending Rights and Dissent Inc$175,00037%
National Security Archive Fund Inc$170,00042%
Friends of the Earth$140,00021%
Whyhunger Inc$140,00041%
The Center for Media Justice DBA MediaJustice$132,50062%
Free Press$132,50061%
National Lawyers Guild Foundation Inc$130,00045%
Public Citizen Inc$125,00012%
Institute for Food and Development Policy Inc$120,000210%
Illuminative Inc$115,000216%
Inquiring Systems Inc$85,60021%
South Africa Development Fund Inc$82,40024%
Global Justice Ecology Project Inc$80,00027%
Project on Government Oversight Inc$80,00021%
Federation of American Scientists$75,00031%
Climate Justice Alliance$70,00020%
As You Sow$70,00021%
Movement Strategy Center$65,00020%
Ecology Action of the Midpeninsula$65,00014%
Comedores Sociales de Puerto Rico Inc$60,00033%
Illinios Workers in Action$60,000317%
Miigwech Inc$60,00032%
Fund for Constitutional Government$60,00021%
Hawaii Peace and Justice$60,00038%
Cultural Survival Inc$60,00030%
Kahea the Hawaiian Environmental Alliance$60,000322%
Sierra Club$60,00010%
Aina Momona$60,00031%
Alianza Americas$60,00031%
Rural Community Workers Alliance$60,000213%
Hui Malama I Ke Ala Ulili$60,00031%
Parceleras Afrocaribenas Por la Transform Barrial$60,00035%
Koihonua$60,00023%
Clean Water Fund$60,00030%
Movement Generation$60,00031%
Bvm Capacity Building Institute Inc$50,0001n/a
Georgia Latino Alliance for Human Rights Inc$50,0001n/a
Pesticide Action Network North America$50,0002n/a
Somos Siembra$50,0001n/a
Grantmakers Concerned With Immigrants and Refugees$50,0001n/a
Twin Cities Innovation Alliance$45,00038%
Rewild$45,00030%
New Economy Coalition Inc$45,00031%
Solidarity Stl Inc$45,00036%
Grassroots Global Justice$45,00031%
Syracuse University$40,00020%
Michigan Organizing Project$40,00011%
Ecosystems of Care$40,000110%
Aguila Youth Leadership Institute Inc$40,000119%
Asian Americans Advancing Justice Atlanta Inc$40,0001n/a
One Fair Wage Inc$40,00020%
The Ceres Trust$35,00030%
Code for Science & Society Inc$30,00020%
The Chisholm Legacy Project Inc$30,00020%
The Praxis Project Inc$30,00010%
Ndn Collective Inc$30,00020%
The Constitution Project$30,0001n/a
Michigan Faith in Action$30,00015%
Data for Indigenous Justice$30,00035%
United Tribes of Bristol Bay$30,0003n/a
Georgia Alliance Education Fund Inc$30,0001n/a
Native Conservancy$30,00030%
Alaskans Take A Stand$30,00034%
University of Massachusetts Foundation Inc$25,00010%
Poder in Action$25,00011%
Tomorrow We Vote$25,000113%
Coming Clean Inc$25,00013%
Hawaii Seed$20,000118%
State Voices$20,00010%
Soul Fire Farm Institute Inc$20,00010%
Allied Media Projects Inc$15,0001n/a
Arizona Dream Act Coalition$15,00013%
Alliance for Global Justice Corp$15,00010%
The Oakland Institute$10,00011%
Instituto Lab$10,00011%
Rural Advancement Foundation Internation$7,50010%

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 22 recipients with no EIN on record ($1.7M), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Warsh-Mott Legacy supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 2 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 81 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFriends of Action Group on Erosion Technology and Concentration: $755,040 over 5y, 53% of budgetGovernment Accountability Project: $600,000 over 7y, 6.2% of budgetPublic Citizen Foundation Inc: $465,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetCenter for Constitutional Rights: $460,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetGlobal Exchange: $365,000 over 5y, 4.7% of budgetWilliam J Brennan Center for Justice Inc: $350,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetSierra Club Foundation: $330,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCenter for International Environmental Law Inc: $300,000 over 5y, 2.6% of budgetInstitute for Agriculture & Trade Policy: $280,000 over 5y, 7.4% of budgetPartnershipforciviljusticefund: $250,000 over 4y, 30% of budgetCenter for Food Safety: $250,000 over 4y, 2.0% of budgetNative Movement: $240,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetConstitutional Accountability Center: $225,000 over 5y, 2.0% of budgetAmerican Constitution Society for Law & Policy: $225,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetXerces Society Inc: $180,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetDefending Rights and Dissent Inc: $175,000 over 3y, 6.8% of budgetNational Security Archive Fund Inc: $170,000 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetFriends of the Earth: $140,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetWhyhunger Inc: $140,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetThe Center for Media Justice DBA MediaJustice: $132,500 over 6y, 1.6% of budgetFree Press: $132,500 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetNational Lawyers Guild Foundation Inc: $130,000 over 4y, 5.3% of budgetPublic Citizen Inc: $125,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetInstitute for Food and Development Policy Inc: $120,000 over 2y, 10% of budgetIlluminative Inc: $115,000 over 2y, 16% of budgetInquiring Systems Inc: $85,600 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetSouth Africa Development Fund Inc: $82,400 over 2y, 4.5% of budgetGlobal Justice Ecology Project Inc: $80,000 over 2y, 7.4% of budgetProject on Government Oversight Inc: $80,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetFederation of American Scientists: $75,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetClimate Justice Alliance: $70,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetAs You Sow: $70,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetMovement Strategy Center: $65,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetEcology Action of the Midpeninsula: $65,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetComedores Sociales de Puerto Rico Inc: $60,000 over 3y, 3.0% of budgetIllinios Workers in Action: $60,000 over 3y, 17% of budgetMiigwech Inc: $60,000 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetFund for Constitutional Government: $60,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetHawaii Peace and Justice: $60,000 over 3y, 8.1% of budgetCultural Survival Inc: $60,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetKahea the Hawaiian Environmental Alliance: $60,000 over 3y, 22% of budgetSierra Club: $60,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAina Momona: $60,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetAlianza Americas: $60,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetRural Community Workers Alliance: $60,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetHui Malama I Ke Ala Ulili: $60,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetParceleras Afrocaribenas Por la Transform Barrial: $60,000 over 3y, 4.7% of budgetKoihonua: $60,000 over 2y, 3.1% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 81.

Nonprofits that may fit its grantmaking

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Cs FundCA76.3× affinity34 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Cs Fund · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Tides Foundation · New Venture Fund · Foundation to Promote Open Society · Rsf Social Finance Inc · The Schmidt Family Foundation · Common Counsel Foundation · Impactassetsinc · Windward Fund · Wallace Global Fund II · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Warsh-Mott Legacy with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Warsh-Mott Legacy?

Find your warmest path to Warsh-Mott Legacy through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Warsh-Mott Legacy

How much does Warsh-Mott Legacy give?
Warsh-Mott Legacy reported 25 grants totaling $1,156,420 in its FY2022 IRS filing. It funded between 15 and 36 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2022.
What does Warsh-Mott Legacy fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Philanthropy (36%), Civil Rights (16%), Environment (15%).
Who are Warsh-Mott Legacy's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: Friends of Action Group on Erosion Technology and Concentration ($755k), Government Accountability Project ($600k), Public Citizen Foundation Inc ($465k).
Does Warsh-Mott Legacy fund new organizations?
In FY2022, 10% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Warsh-Mott Legacy accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Warsh-Mott Legacy?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Cs Fund, Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc, Tides Foundation.
Where is Warsh-Mott Legacy based?
Warsh-Mott Legacy is based in CA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 122 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Warsh-Mott Legacy’s filings →

More from the funding graph