Skip to content
Warren and Beverly Boos Charitable Trust C/O Greg Schupra Trustee at a glance

· Private foundation

Warren and Beverly Boos Charitable Trust C/O Greg Schupra Trustee

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$30k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Human Services$503kRecreation & Sports$500kYouth Development$235kPhilanthropy$220kEducation$205kInternational$50kFood & Nutrition$35kHealth$28kOther$0
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NEW CITY KIDS$10,000
DREAM CENTERS OF MICHIGAN$10,000
STUDENT STATESMANSHIP INSTITUTE$5,000
FLORIDA BAPTIST CHILDRENS HOME$2,500
CHILDREN'S ORGAN TRANSPLANT ASSOC$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–24, $305k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 8% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%LIVING AND LEARNING ENRICHMENT CENT: $25k → 8%PAWS WITH A CAUSE: $25k → 10%DREAM CENTERS OF MICHIGAN: $200k → 8%REVIVE & THRIVE PROJECT: $25k → 11%DREAM CENTERS OF MICHIGAN: $10k → 8%OPEN DOOR OUTREACH CENTER: $20k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

15%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$253k · 3 repeat orgs$1.5M to everyone else

3 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
14

Total granted

$253k
$1.5M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-43%
+15%

Still filing today

67%
79%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationPhilanthropyPublic BenefitYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DC
    Dream Centers of Michigan
    2× · 2023–2024 · $210k · revenue -43%
  • NEW CITY KIDS INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $35k · revenue -55%
  • FB
    FLORIDA BAPTIST CHILDRENS HOME
    2× · 2023–2024 · $8k

Funded once

  • TA
    TRAVERSE AREA RECREATION & TRANSPOR
    one grant, 2022 · $500k
  • RM
    RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE
    one grant, 2020 · $200k
  • BI
    BUILD IT FOR THE BRAVE - FISHER HOU
    one grant, 2020 · $200k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New Roots Institute

New Roots Institute is a nonprofit empowering the next generation with knowledge and training to end factory farming.

Food & Nutrition
2
Donor Alliance Inc

Donor Alliance saves and heals lives through organ and tissue donation. Donor Alliance is one of 55 Federally designated, non-profit organ procurement organizations serving Colorado and most of Wyoming. Additionally, it is a member of the…

Health
3
Manna University

Manna University is a biblical higher education institution dedicated to educating, equipping, and empowering emerging leaders to change the world.

Education
4
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
5
Arborbrook Christian Academy

Arborbrook Christian Academy partners with parents to equip, empower, and encourage students to cultivate godly character, pursue life-long learning, and love the Lord Jesus Christ.

Education
6
Arbor Research Collaborative for Health

Arbor research collaborative for health is committed to improving patient care through research that shapes medical policies and practice. in particular, arbor research conducts health outcomes research on chronic disease and end-stage…

Health
7
Coop Careers Inc

Building a movement of diverse, upwardly mobile college grads overcoming underemployment through digital skills and peer connections.

Education
8
Leadership Indianapolis Inc

Educate, Inspire, Connect and Mobilize Community Leaders to serve and strengthen greater Indianapolis.

Public Benefit
9
Center for Family Health

The mission of the Center for Family Health is opening the door to health care for all.

Health
10
Deans for Impact

See Schedule ODeans for Impact supports educator-preparation programs to bring the science of learning into teaching practice; partners with policymakers to ensure pathways into teaching are accessible, practice-based, and…

Education
11
The Northern Michigan University Foundation

The nmu foundation will establish and foster relationships to generate resources that benefit the strategic goals of northern michigan university.

Education
12
Eat Real Certified Inc

We empower food service programs and school districts to make food delicious, nourishing, and responsible through our evidence-based certification program. We provide education and support that inspires students, schools, and communities…

Public Benefit
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kids' Food Basket Inc; the most unlike its peers is Alma College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
9/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TRAVERSE AREA RECREATION & TRANSPOR: $500,000 · OtherTRAVERSE AREA RECREATION & TRANSPORRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $200,000 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD HOUSEBUILD IT FOR THE BRAVE - FISHER HOU: $200,000 · OtherBUILD IT FOR THE BRAVE - FISHER HOUNEW CITY KIDS INC: $35,000 · Other+4 more: $25,000 · OtherALMA COLLEGE: $155,000 · EducationALMA COLLEGECHARITABLE GIFT AMERICA INC: $125,000 · EducationCHARITABLE GIFT AMERI…ROOTS MONTESSORI SCHOOL: $50,000 · EducationROOTS MONTESSORI SCHO…Dream Centers of Michigan: $210,000 · Human ServicesDream Centers of Mi…Revive & Thrive Project: $25,000 · Human ServicesRevive & Thrive Pro…Paws With A Cause: $25,000 · Human ServicesPaws With A CauseLIVING & LEARNING ENRICHMENT CENTER: $25,000 · Human ServicesLIVING & LEARNING E…OPEN DOOR OUTREACH CENTER INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesOPEN DOOR OUTREACH …MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $50,000 · InternationalACT3 MINISTRY INC: $50,000 · PhilanthropyFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $45,000 · Community ImprovementFISHER HOUSE MICHIGAN: $40,000 · Public Benefit
Other$960,000Education$330,000Human Services$305,000International$50,000Philanthropy$50,000Community Improvement$45,000Public Benefit$40,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDream Centers of Michigan: $210,000 over 2y, 19% of budgetALMA COLLEGE: $155,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCHARITABLE GIFT AMERICA INC: $125,000 over 1y, 7.6% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetACT3 MINISTRY INC: $50,000 over 1y, 71% of budgetROOTS MONTESSORI SCHOOL: $50,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $45,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFISHER HOUSE MICHIGAN: $40,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetNEW CITY KIDS INC: $35,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetRevive & Thrive Project: $25,000 over 1y, 5.4% of budgetPaws With A Cause: $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetLIVING & LEARNING ENRICHMENT CENTER: $25,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetOPEN DOOR OUTREACH CENTER INC: $20,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetKIDS' FOOD BASKET INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetStudent Statesmanship Institute: $5,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetCOTA - Children's Organ Transplant Association: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation …Raymond James Charita…National Philanthropi…Natl Christian Charit…Morgan Stanley Global…Fidelity Investments …Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
Community Foundation for Southeast MichiganMI13.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Warren and Beverly Boos Charitable Trust C/O Greg Schupra Trustee funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Warren and Beverly Boos Charitable Trust C/O Greg Schupra Trustee. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Warren and Beverly Boos Charitable Trust C/O Greg Schupra Trustee?

    Find your warmest path to Warren and Beverly Boos Charitable Trust C/O Greg Schupra Trustee through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Warren and Beverly Boos Charitable Trust C/O Greg Schupra Trustee’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home