Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Ward Family Foundation Attn Mr Bill Ward

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$23k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What you fund
0187% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Health$69kArts & Culture$31kYouth Development$13kHuman Services$12kCommunity Improvement$11kRecreation & Sports$10kEducation$9kEmployment$8kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YMCA CINCINNATI$5,000
AYE$5,000
LA FOOD BANK$2,500
PARKS CONSERVANCY$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,500
CARNEGIE ARTS EDUCATION$1,000
RETTS SYNDROME FOUNDATION$1,000
CINCINNATI PUBLIC RADIO$1,000
EWS$750
Individual grant recipient$500
Individual grant recipient$500
CASA$500
JWC$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–20, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%THE CHILDREN'S HOME: $1k → 16%STEPPING STONES: $1k → 16%INNER CITY YOUTH OPPORTUNITIES: $500 → 16%RESOURCE: $1k → 16%CINCINNATI WORKS: $5k → 16%CINCINNATI WORKS: $1k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

48%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$93k · 18 repeat orgs$101k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +42% since the first grant, against +21% for the ones you funded once.

18 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
35

Total granted

$93k
$83k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
+21%

Still filing today

33%
54%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 19% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $19k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesEducationCommunity ImprovementEnvironmentInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SF
    SAN FRANCISCO MUSEUM OF MODERN ART
    8× · 2017–2024 · $21k · revenue +37%
  • CW
    CINCINNATI WORKS
    2× · 2017–2018 · $6k · revenue +19%
  • BT
    BREAKTHROUGH T1D
    2× · 2020–2021 · $3k · revenue +42%

Funded once

  • CC
    CHIRST COLLEGE NURSING
    one grant, 2024 · $40k
  • OS
    Optim-All Servicesgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue +437%
  • TC
    THE CINCINNATI WOMAN'S CLUBgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +126%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Cincinnati Youth Collaborative

Cincinnati Youth Collaborative ("CYC") empowers young people to overcome barriers and excel in education, career, and life.

Education
2
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
3
Cincinnati Chamber Orchestra

Cincinnati Chamber Orchestra (CCO) creates intimate, transformative experiences that connect the musically curious.

Arts & Culture
4
Cincinnati Museum Center

Cincinnati museum center inspires people of all ages to learn more about our world through science, regional history, and educational, engaging and meaningful experiences.

Arts & Culture
5
World Affairs Council - Cincinnati & Northern Kentucky

The World Affairs Council, a 501(c)3 nonprofit, is the bridge that connects the world to one of America's most vibrant regions. Through Global education, International exchange, and cultural awareness initiatives, the council strengthens…

6
Digitalc

Empower the people of greater cleveland to achieve success through technology, innovation and connected community.

Community Improvement
7
Art Opportunities Inc

To create community driven public art and launch careers for youth and artists.

Arts & Culture
8
City Year Inc

City year helps students and schools succeed, while preparing the next generation of civically engaged leaders who can work across lines of difference. partnering with teachers, teams of city year americorps members cultivate learning…

Unclassified
9
Citizen Schools Inc

In fiscal year 2025, the agency operated an americorps maker fellowship, placing 7 americorps vista members at 6 different education focused organizations in ca, ma, and ny. americorps members worked on capacity building projects to expand…

Education
10
Colorado Museum of Natural History

Be a catalyst! Ignite our community's passion for nature and science.

Arts & Culture
11
The Greater Cincinnati Foundation

As a trusted and connected partner, we inspire generous people to invest in a more equitable and vibrant region now and for generations to come.

Philanthropy
12
Cintrifuse

To empower Cincinnati entrepreneurs to launch bold, scalable startups; and we work to improve the odds of those startups growing into transformational companies.

Community Improvement

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The San Francisco Foundation and the most unlike its peers is San Francisco Museum of Modern Art. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyArtist Development & Perfor…Systems Change & Impact Fun…Performing Arts Organizatio…Early Childhood Education P…Housing and Support ServicesYouth Sports & RecreationSenior Residential CareRegional Business & Civic A…Community Poverty Alleviati…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 41 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number21%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr18%14%10–20yr18%32%20–35yr16%11%35–55yr14%43%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value21%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr18%12%10–20yr18%18%20–35yr16%17%35–55yr14%54%55yr+

The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/30
the rest of the field
12%
1,415/11,899

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 64 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/29
Grantees still filing
22/29
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CHIRST COLLEGE NURSING — $40,000 · OtherCHIRST COLLEGE NURSINGCANCER SUPPORT — $20,000 · OtherCANCER SUPPORTDRESS FOR SUCCESS — $7,750 · OtherDRESS FOR SUCCESSGOLDEN GATE NATIONAL PARK — $6,000 · OtherYMCA CINCINNATI — $5,000 · OtherAYE — $5,000 · Other+40 more — $47,600 · Other+40 moreSAN FRANCISCO MUSEUM OF MODERN ART — $20,500 · Arts & CultureSAN FRANCISCO M…CatchLight — $2,500 · Arts & CultureCatchLightCincinnati Public Radio Inc — $1,000 · Arts & CultureThe Greater Cincinnati Television Educational Foundation — $1,000 · Arts & Culture+2 more — $1,006 · Arts & CultureGOLDEN GATE NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVANCY — $9,850 · EnvironmentNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC — $1,000 · EnvironmentTHE CINCINNATI WOMAN'S CLUB — $5,000 · Community ImprovementJunior League of Cincinnati — $5,000 · Community ImprovementCINCINNATI WORKS — $6,000 · Human ServicesCommunity Resource Center Inc — $1,200 · Human ServicesSTEPPING STONES INC — $1,000 · Human ServicesThe Children's Home of Cincinnati Ohio — $1,000 · Human ServicesINNER CITY YOUTH OPPORTUNITIES — $500 · Human ServicesOptim-All Services — $5,000 · EducationGATEWAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS — $500 · EducationBREAKTHROUGH T1D — $2,750 · Health
Other$131,350Arts & Culture$26,006Environment$10,850Community Improvement$10,000Human Services$9,700Education$5,500Health$2,750

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSAN FRANCISCO MUSEUM OF MODERN ART — $20,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetGOLDEN GATE NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVANCY — $9,850 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetOptim-All Services — $5,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetTHE CINCINNATI WOMAN'S CLUB — $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetJunior League of Cincinnati — $5,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D — $2,750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCatchLight — $2,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSUMMER SEARCH — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEducation Outside — $1,600 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBLACK SWAMP AREA COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE VOTER PARTICIPATION CENTER — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCincinnati Public Radio Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDJERASSI RESIDENT ARTISTS PROGRAM — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSTEPPING STONES INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Children's Home of Cincinnati Ohio — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Greater Cincinnati Television Educational Foundation — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWYOMING SCHOOL FOUNDATION — $750 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetKQED INC — $506 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetShelterhouse Volunteer Group Inc — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWyoming Community Foundation — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGATEWAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFREESTORE FOODBANK INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetISPACE INC — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetINNER CITY YOUTH OPPORTUNITIES — $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO MUSEUM OF MODERN ART
  • Who funds GOLDEN GATE NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVANCY
  • Who funds CINCINNATI WORKS
  • Who funds Optim-All Services
  • Who funds THE CINCINNATI WOMAN'S CLUB
  • Who funds Junior League of Cincinnati
  • Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D
  • Who funds CatchLight
  • Who funds SUMMER SEARCH
  • Who funds Education Outside
  • Who funds Community Resource Center Inc
  • Who funds BLACK SWAMP AREA COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA
  • Who funds THE SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THE VOTER PARTICIPATION CENTER
  • Who funds Cincinnati Public Radio Inc
  • Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC
  • Who funds DJERASSI RESIDENT ARTISTS PROGRAM
  • Who funds STEPPING STONES INC
  • Who funds The Children's Home of Cincinnati Ohio

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Greater Cincinnati FoundationOH28.3× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Greater Cincinnati Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation · L & L Nippert Charitable Foundation Inc Attn Carter F Randolph Phd · Carol Ann and Ralph V Haile Jr Foundation · Johnson Charitable Gift Fund · The Thomas J Emery Memorial · Charles H Dater Foundation Inc · Elsa M Heisel Sule Charitable Trust 2005 · Robert H & Susan F Castellini Foundation · John a Schroth Family Char Tr · Duke Energy Foundation · Charles Scott Riley III Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Ward Family Foundation Attn Mr Bill Ward funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 30%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc30% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Ward Family Foundation Attn Mr Bill Ward?

Find your warmest path to Ward Family Foundation Attn Mr Bill Ward through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 64 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph