Skip to content

· Private foundation

Walter E & Helen W Bruckert

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$93k
Granted FY2025still arriving
21
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$12k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$930kScience & Tech$1k
02FY2025 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k18 grants · $60k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $33k
$2,500
Median grant
6
States reached
$1.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EASTERN OREGON UNIVERSITY$12,000
OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY$11,250
CENTRAL WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY$10,000
GEORGE FOX UNIVERSITY$8,500
COLUMBIA GORGE COMMUNITY COLLEGE$8,500
BELLEVUE COMMUNITY COLLEGE$6,000
LINFIELD UNIVERSITY$5,750
COLUMBIA BASIN COLLEGE$5,000
LINN BENTON COMMUNITY COLLEGE$4,125
EASTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY$3,500
PACIFIC UNIVERSITY$2,500
WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY$2,500
UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA$2,375
PRIME LINE ACADEMY$2,000
BLUE MOUNTAIN COMMUNITY COLLEGE$1,750
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY22–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 95% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY: $4k → 11%NORTH IDAHO COLLEGE: $2k → 10%PRIME LINE ACADEMY: $2k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO: $6k → 16%BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITYIDAHO: $5k → 22%COLLEGE OF THE REDWOODS: $3k → 18%OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY: $2k → 19%UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA: $2k → 17%PACIFIC UNIVERSITY: $3k → 8%CENTRAL OREGON COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $3k → 10%GEORGE FOX UNIVERSITY: $9k → 11%BLUE MOUNTAIN COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $10k → 12%WESTERN OREGON UNIVERSITY: $4k → 13%LINN BENTON COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $4k → 13%EASTERN OREGON UNIVERSITY: $12k → 15%COLUMBIA GORGE COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $17k → 16%SW OREGON COMMUNITY COLLEGE FDN: $1k → 17%OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY: $11k → 18%WESTERN GOVERNORS UNIVERSITY: $2k → 8%BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY: $2k → 8%DIXIE STATE UNIVERSITY: $4k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: $4k → 9%COLUMBIA BASIN COLLEGE: $5k → 11%CENTRAL WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $10k → 11%WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY: $3k → 12%SPOKANE FALLS COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $2k → 12%WALLA WALLA COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $4k → 13%GRAND CANYON UNIVERSITY: $12k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO: $4k → 16%CENTRAL OREGON COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $2k → 10%GEORGE FOX UNIVERSITY: $2k → 11%BLUE MOUNTAIN COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $2k → 12%EASTERN OREGON UNIVERSITY: $3k → 15%COLUMBIA GORGE COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $9k → 16%OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY: $6k → 18%UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: $4k → 9%GONZAGA UNIVERSITY: $7k → 12%CENTRAL OREGON COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $3k → 10%GEORGE FOX UNIVERSITY: $2k → 11%COLUMBIA GORGE COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $5k → 16%EASTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $4k → 12%OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY CASCADES: $10k → 10%LINFIELD UNIVERSITY: $6k → 11%WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY: $4k → 9%WHITWORTH UNIVERSITY: $2k → 12%WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY: $3k → 9%SPOKANE FALLS COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $5k → 12%BELLEVUE COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $6k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
ID
MT
NY
OR
WY
IA
OH
CA
UT
CO
NE
WV
AZ
HI
OK
AL
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$829k · 47 repeat orgs$102k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +31% since the first grant, against +14% for those funded once.

47 repeat relationships: 19 still active in FY2025, 28 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

47
29

Total granted

$829k
$98k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+14%

Still filing today

13%
28%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CORPORATION OF GONZAGA UNIVERSITY
    5× · 2017–2022 · $34k · revenue +42%
  • GF
    GEORGE FOX UNIVERSITY
    6× · 2018–2025 · $22k · revenue +31%
  • LU
    Linfield University
    4× · 2017–2025 · $22k · revenue +3%

Funded once

  • GC
    Grand Canyon University
    one grant, 2023 · $12k · revenue +19%
  • OS
    OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY CASCADES
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • SM
    SAINT MARTIN'S UNIVERSITYgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $8k · revenue +68%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
2
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
3
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
4
President-Board of Trustees Santa Clara College

Scu is a catholic and jesuit institution that makes student learning its central focus, promotes faculty and staff learning in its various forms, and exhibits organizational learning.

Education
5
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
6
Roger Williams University

At Roger Williams University, students are prepared to be thinkers and doers ready to solve challenging problems with innovative solutions. RWU offers robust offerings of undergraduate, graduate and professional programs across eight…

Education
7
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
8
Trinity University

Trinity university is an independent co-educational university whose mission is excellence in the interrelated areas of teaching, research and services.

Education
9
University of Rio Grande

The university of rio grande/ rio grande community college is america's unique private/public institution of higher education designed to provide learners the opportunity to attain a high-quality, high-value education. our personalized,…

Education
10
Xavier University

Xavier is a jesuit catholic university rooted in the liberal arts tradition. our mission is to educate each student intellectually, morally, and spiritually. we create learning opportunities through rigorous academic and professional…

Education
11
John Brown University

John brown university (jbu) provides christ-centered education that prepares students to honor god and serve others by developing their intellectual, spiritual, and professional lives. (continued on schedule o)jbu serves traditional…

Education
12
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Linfield University; the most unlike its peers is Lewis & Clark College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 78 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/15
Grantees still filing
12/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY: $107,381 · OtherOREGON STATE UNIVERSITYWASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY: $70,321 · OtherWASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITYCENTRAL WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $60,750 · OtherCENTRAL WASHINGTON UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: $44,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTONWESTERN OREGON UNIVERSITY: $36,500 · OtherEASTERN OREGON UNIVERSITY: $36,000 · OtherCOLUMBIA GORGE COMM COLLEGE: $35,000 · OtherBLUE MOUNTAIN COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $32,464 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF IDAHO: $32,000 · OtherCOLUMBIA GORGE COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $30,500 · Other+54 more: $315,451 · Other+54 moreCORPORATION OF GONZAGA UNIVERSITY: $34,000 · EducationCORPORATION OF …GEORGE FOX UNIVERSITY: $21,750 · EducationGEORGE FOX UNIV…Linfield University: $21,500 · EducationLinfield Univer…Grand Canyon University: $12,000 · EducationGrand Canyon Un…SAINT MARTIN'S UNIVERSITY: $8,000 · EducationSAINT MARTIN'S …Creighton University: $7,000 · EducationCreighton Unive…EMBRY-RIDDLE AERONAUTICAL UNIVERSITY INC: $6,666 · EducationLEWIS & CLARK COLLEGE: $5,500 · EducationPACIFIC UNIVERSITY: $4,500 · Education+5 more: $10,000 · Education+5 more
Other$800,367Education$130,916

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCORPORATION OF GONZAGA UNIVERSITY: $34,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGE FOX UNIVERSITY: $21,750 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetLinfield University: $21,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGrand Canyon University: $12,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAINT MARTIN'S UNIVERSITY: $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCreighton University: $7,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEMBRY-RIDDLE AERONAUTICAL UNIVERSITY INC: $6,666 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLEWIS & CLARK COLLEGE: $5,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPACIFIC UNIVERSITY: $4,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe College of Idaho Inc: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSEATTLE PACIFIC UNIVERSITY: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWHITWORTH UNIVERSITY: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDOMINICAN UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMOLLOY UNIVERSITY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CORPORATION OF GONZAGA UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds GEORGE FOX UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Linfield University ↗
  • Who funds Grand Canyon University ↗
  • Who funds SAINT MARTIN'S UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Creighton University ↗
  • Who funds EMBRY-RIDDLE AERONAUTICAL UNIVERSITY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

West Scholarship FndMN13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: West Scholarship Fnd · Jefferson Scholarship Fund · Wf & Blanche E West Educational & Coffman Jf · Leo Adler Trust · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Walter E & Helen W Bruckert funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Walter E & Helen W Bruckert. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • Pacific University: 5% of income from government
  • Linfield University: 4% of income from government
  • George Fox University: 3% of income from government
  • Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Lewis & Clark College: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 78 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Walter E & Helen W Bruckert’s filings →

More from the funding graph