Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

West Scholarship Fnd

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$182k
Granted FY2025still arriving
43
Grants FY2025still arriving
16
States reached
$36k
Largest
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$1.1MRecreation & Sports$2kHuman Services$34Other$0
02FY2025 · 43 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k40 grants · $99k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $83k
$2,200
Median grant
16
States reached
$3.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY$35,626
OREGON INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY$31,610
UNIVERSITY OF OREGON$15,669
OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY$6,867
SOUTHERN OREGON UNIVERSITY$5,935
BOISE STATE UNIVERSITY$5,600
UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO$5,300
CORBAN UNIVERSITY$4,700
GONZAGA UNIVERSITY$4,000
WESTERN OREGON UNIVERSITY$4,000
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY$3,900
BUSHNELL UNIVERSITY$3,900
SW OREGON COMMUNITY COLLEGE$2,868
PURDUE UNIVERSITY$2,800
PACIFIC UNIVERSITY$2,600
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY21–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 84% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%GRAND CANYON UNIVERSITY: $2k → 11%EMBRYRIDDLE AERONAUTICAL UNIVERSITY: $2k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA: $2k → 15%BOISE STATE UNIVERSITY: $6k → 8%NORTHWEST NAZARENE UNIVERSITY: $734 → 11%IDAHO STATE UNIVERSITY: $1k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO: $5k → 16%BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY IDAHO: $1k → 22%UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA WESTERN: $2k → 12%CAL POLY STATE UNIVERSITY: $2k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $2k → 14%LASSEN COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $2k → 17%BAYLOR UNIVERSITY: $2k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF THE SOUTHWEST: $734 → 19%OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY: $2k → 19%KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY: $1k → 20%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST LOUIS: $1k → 11%HAMLINE UNIVERSITY: $2k → 10%PACIFIC UNIVERSITY: $3k → 8%GEORGE FOX UNIVERSITY: $2k → 11%OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY: $7k → 12%SOUTHERN OREGON UNIVERSITY: $6k → 13%WESTERN OREGON UNIVERSITY: $4k → 13%CORBAN UNIVERSITY: $5k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF OREGON: $16k → 15%KLAMATH COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $2k → 16%SW OREGON COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $3k → 17%UMPQUA COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $667 → 17%BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY: $4k → 8%UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY: $2k → 12%PURDUE UNIVERSITY: $3k → 13%WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY: $734 → 12%GONZAGA UNIVERSITY: $4k → 12%TULANE UNIVERSITY: $1k → 23%ASBURY UNIVERSITY: $1k → 12%THE COLLEGE OF IDAHO INC: $1k → 11%WEST TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY: $2k → 14%LINFIELD UNIVERSITY: $2k → 11%WESTERN OREGON UNIVERSITY: $1k → 13%BUSHNELL UNIVERSITY: $4k → 15%OREGON INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $32k → 16%UTAH VALLEY UNIVERSITY: $1k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
ID
MT
MN
WI
NY
MA
OR
NV
IN
OH
CA
UT
MO
KY
AZ
NM
KS
OK
LA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$897k · 48 repeat orgs$46k to everyone else

48 repeat relationships — 31 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

48
19

Total granted

$897k
$30k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
+42%

Still filing today

33%
26%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GF
    GEORGE FOX UNIVERSITY
    6× · 2017–2025 · $16k · revenue +36%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF PORTLAND
    4× · 2017–2021 · $14k · revenue +7%
  • PU
    PACIFIC UNIVERSITY
    6× · 2017–2025 · $13k · revenue +9%

Funded once

  • KC
    KLAMETH COMMUNITY COLLEGE
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • O
    OHSU
    one grant, 2018 · $4k
  • TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITYgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $3k · revenue +45%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
California Lutheran University

The mission of the university is to educate leaders for a global society who are strong in character and judgment, confident in their identity and vocation, and committed to service and justice.

Education
2
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
3
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
4
Lewis & Clark College

Lewis & clark is a premier private higher education institution offering an exceptional education in an inclusive environment. by fostering critical thinking, innovation, creativity, civic engagement, and leadership, both inside and…

Education
5
Marquette University

As a Catholic, Jesuit university our mission is to search for truth, discover shareknowledge, foster personal professional excellence, promote a life of faith and developleadership expressed in service to others. See Schedule O.

Education
6
Texas Christian University

Texas christian university is an institution of higher education which includes nine major academic units: liberal arts, science and engineering, business, education, fine arts, communication, honors, nursing and health sciences, and the…

Education
7
St Marys University of Minnesota

Enriched by the lasallian catholic heritage, saint mary's university of minnesota awakens, nurtures, and empowers learners to ethical lives of service and leadership.

Education
8
John Brown University

John brown university (jbu) provides christ-centered education that prepares students to honor god and serve others by developing their intellectual, spiritual, and professional lives. (continued on schedule o)jbu serves traditional…

Education
9
The Catholic University of America

As the national university of the catholic church in the united states, founded and sponsored by the bishops of the country with the approval of the holy see, the catholic university of america is committed to being a comprehensive…

Education
10
Augustana University Association

Inspired by lutheran scholarly tradition and the liberal arts, augustana provides an education of enduring worth that challenges the intellect, fosters integrity and integrates faith with learning and service in a diverse world.

Education
11
John Carroll University

As a jesuit catholic university committed to academic rigor, inclusive excellence, and care for the whole person, john carroll university inspires individuals of intellect and character to learn, lead and serve in the community and…

Education
12
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Portland and the most unlike its peers is Brigham Young University Alumni Llc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 77 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%0%<5yr13%3%5–10yr19%14%10–20yr19%3%20–35yr12%14%35–55yr16%67%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%0%<5yr13%1%5–10yr19%13%10–20yr19%2%20–35yr12%14%35–55yr16%70%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/41
the rest of the field
11%
2,771/25,390

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 80 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/28
Grantees still filing
21/28
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY — $215,150 · OtherOREGON STATE UNIVERSITYOREGON INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY — $210,198 · OtherOREGON INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGYUNIVERSITY OF OREGON — $123,435 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF OREGONKLAMATH COMMUNITY COLLEGE — $31,382 · OtherSOUTHERN OREGON UNIVERSITY — $29,065 · Other+48 more — $208,612 · Other+48 moreGEORGE FOX UNIVERSITY — $16,000 · EducationGEORGE FOX UNIV…CORBAN UNIVERSITY — $14,850 · EducationCORBAN UNIVERSI…UNIVERSITY OF PORTLAND — $14,300 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF P…PACIFIC UNIVERSITY — $13,000 · EducationPACIFIC UNIVERS…Linfield University — $12,200 · EducationLinfield Univer…CORPORATION OF GONZAGA UNIVERSITY — $7,300 · EducationCORPORATION OF …BUSHNELL UNIVERSITY FKA NORTHWEST CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY — $6,300 · EducationDENISON UNIVERSITY — $4,800 · EducationBAYLOR UNIVERSITY — $4,500 · Education+18 more — $37,968 · Education+18 more
Other$817,842Education$131,218

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetGEORGE FOX UNIVERSITY — $16,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCORBAN UNIVERSITY — $14,850 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PORTLAND — $14,300 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPACIFIC UNIVERSITY — $13,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetLinfield University — $12,200 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCORPORATION OF GONZAGA UNIVERSITY — $7,300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBUSHNELL UNIVERSITY FKA NORTHWEST CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY — $6,300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDENISON UNIVERSITY — $4,800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBAYLOR UNIVERSITY — $4,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGrand Canyon University — $4,200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY — $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEMBRY-RIDDLE AERONAUTICAL UNIVERSITY INC — $3,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $3,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY — $2,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWILLAMETTE UNIVERSITY — $2,400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac — $2,300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetASBURY COLLEGE — $2,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCornell University — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBIOLA UNIVERSITY INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMULTNOMAH UNIVERSITY — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe College of Idaho Inc — $1,300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPEPPERDINE UNIVERSITY — $1,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND — $1,100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINDIANA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE HAMLINE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHWEST NAZARENE UNIVERSITY INC — $734 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF THE SOUTHWEST — $734 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GEORGE FOX UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds CORBAN UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PORTLAND
  • Who funds PACIFIC UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds Linfield University
  • Who funds CORPORATION OF GONZAGA UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds BUSHNELL UNIVERSITY FKA NORTHWEST CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds DENISON UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds BAYLOR UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds Grand Canyon University
  • Who funds Brigham Young University Alumni LLC
  • Who funds WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Amy Heryford Ousley and James Heryford OusleyTX17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amy Heryford Ousley and James Heryford Ousley · Walter & Mary a Stastny Charitable Foundation · Leo Adler Trust · Tulsa Community Foundation · Eminger Stewart Foundation Uma · Wayne C Stewart Foundation Uma · Jefferson Scholarship Fund · Folds of Honor Foundation · M J Murdock Charitable Trust · Joann Hamilton Memorial Fund · Walter E & Helen W Bruckert · Wf & Blanche E West Educational & Coffman Jf

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization West Scholarship Fnd funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 4%
  • Trustees of Boston University12% of income from government
  • Bushnell University Fka Northwest Christian University5% of income from government
  • Pacific University5% of income from government
  • Willamette University4% of income from government
  • Linfield University4% of income from government
  • Corban University4% of income from government
  • George Fox University3% of income from government
  • Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Inc2% of income from government
  • University of Portland2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 80 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph