Skip to content

· Private foundation

Wal-Dot Foundation

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$4.0M
Granted FY2023
28
Grants FY2023
6
States reached
$1.3M
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Philanthropy$3.9MHuman Services$504kHealth$415kYouth Development$255kEducation$231kPublic Safety & Disaster$195kHousing & Shelter$95kReligion$87kOther$0
02FY2023 · 28 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k19 grants · $61k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $80k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $65k
  • $250k+3 grants · $3.8M
$5,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PINON TRAIL FOUNDATION$1,265,286
SUSAN SCHWARTZ CHARITABLE FOUNDATION$1,265,286
GOLDMAN SACHS PHILANTHROPY FUND$1,265,286
Individual grant recipient$65,000
JCC DENVERROBERT E LOUP JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER$25,000
COMMUNITY HOMES FOR ADULTS INC$15,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS-NORTH TEXAS REGION$15,000
JEWISH CHILDREN REGIONAL SERVICE$15,000
NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH$10,000
VOGEL ALCOVE$5,000
HEBREW UNION COLLEGE$5,000
SCOTTISH RITE FOUNDATION$5,000
OKLAHOMA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$5,000
JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE$5,000
DALLAS FURNITURE BANK$4,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $385k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%COMMUNITY HOMES FOR ADULTS INC: $15k → 14%COMMUNITY HOMES FOR ADULTS INC: $15k → 14%COMMUNITY HOMES FOR ADULTS INC: $15k → 14%COMMUNITY HOMES FOR ADULTS INC: $15k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $35k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $35k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $35k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $35k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $15k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $15k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $5k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS-NORTH TEXAS REGION: $30k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS-NORTH TEXAS REGION: $30k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS-NORTH TEXAS REGION: $30k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS-NORTH TEXAS REGION: $15k → 14%COMMUNITY HOMES FOR ADULTS INC: $15k → 14%COMMUNITY HOMES FOR ADULTS INC: $15k → 14%COMMUNITY HOMES FOR ADULTS INC: $15k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
OH
CO
OK
LA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

38%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.3M · 32 repeat orgs$3.8M to everyone else

32 repeat relationships: 25 still active in FY2023, 7 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

32
4

Total granted

$2.3M
$28k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
+72%

Still filing today

50%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 5% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3.8M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
Human ServicesHealthEducationPhilanthropyArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JC
    JEWISH CHILDREN'S REGIONAL SERVICE
    7× · 2017–2023 · $255k · revenue +13%
  • JF
    JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE
    7× · 2017–2023 · $175k · revenue +15%
  • NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH
    7× · 2017–2023 · $160k · revenue +50%

Funded once

  • VC
    VNA CARE NETWORK
    one grant, 2017 · $20k
  • LF
    LAKE FOREST ACADEMYgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $6k · revenue +45%
  • KF
    KIDNEY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Children's Health System of Texas

With more than 1 million patient visits each year, Children's Health is North Texas' leading pediatric health system and among the largest in the nation. For more than a century, our mission has been clear: make life better for children.…

Health
2
Methodist Hospitals of Dallas

The primary mission or purpose of methodist health system is to serve people in defined service areas by meeting their health needs effectively and in a manner that reflects a "commitment to the christian concepts of life and learning" as…

Health
3
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
4
Dallas-Fort Worth Hospital Council

The mission of the Dallas-Fort Worth Hospital Council is to drive evidence-based improvement in patient care and health equity throughout the region.

—
5
Texas Trees Foundation

The mission of texas trees foundation is to improve the health of cities and people through the transformative power of trees.

—
6
Mhs Physicians of Texas

Memorial hermann health system is a nonprofit, values-driven, community-owned health system dedicated to improving health. our vision is to create healthier communities, now and for generations to come. our values are community,…

Health
7
Memorial Hermann Health System

Memorial hermann health system is a nonprofit, values-driven, community-owned health system dedicated to improving health. our vision is to create healthier communities, now and for generations to come. our values are community,…

Health
8
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
9
Methodist Healthcare-Memphis Hospitals

Methodist le bonheur healthcare, in partnership with its medical staffs, will collaborate with patients and their families to be the leader in providing high quality, cost-effective patient-and family-centered care. services will be…

Health
10
Meadows Mental Health Policy Institute for Texas

Independent and nonpartisan, the Meadows Mental Health Policy Institute works at the intersection of policy and programs to create equitable systemic changes so all people in Texas, the nation, and the world can obtain the health care they…

Health
11
HealthTexas Provider Network

To deliver the highest value patient experience through quality, safety, accessibility, and cost-effectiveness, enhanced by medical education and research in collaboration with Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH).

Health
12
Presbyterian Healthcare Services

Presbyterian exists to ensure all of the patients, members and communities we serve can achieve their best health.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pediplace Inc; the most unlike its peers is Pinon Trail Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
17/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GOLDMAN SACHS PHILANTHROPY FUND: $1,265,286 · OtherGOLDMAN SACHS PHILANTHROPY FUNDSUSAN SCHWARTZ CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $1,265,286 · OtherSUSAN SCHWARTZ CHARITABLE FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $270,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $195,000 · OtherJCC DENVERROBERT E LOUP JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $175,000 · Other+17 more: $634,500 · Other+17 morePINON TRAIL FOUNDATION: $1,265,286 · PhilanthropyPINON TRAIL FOUNDATIONJEWISH CHILDREN'S REGIONAL SERVICE: $255,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH CHILDRE…JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $175,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMILY …American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $105,000 · Human ServicesAmerican Natio…COMMUNITY HOMES FOR ADULTS INC: $105,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY HOME…VOGEL ALCOVE: $95,000 · Human ServicesVOGEL ALCOVEDALLAS FURNITURE BANK: $49,000 · Human ServicesDALLAS FURNITU…NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH: $160,000 · HealthTexas Health Resources Foundation: $39,000 · HealthMENTAL HEALTH AMERICA OF GREATER DALLAS: $31,500 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD: $16,000 · Health+1 more: $1,000 · HealthGRANT HALLIBURTON FOUNDATION INC: $29,500 · EducationOKLAHOMA CITY UNIVERSITY: $27,000 · EducationLAKE FOREST ACADEMY: $6,125 · EducationNORTH TEXAS PUBLIC BROADCASTING INC: $3,000 · Arts & CultureSalesmanship Club of Dallas: $2,100 · Community Improvement
Other$3,805,072Philanthropy$1,265,286Human Services$784,000Health$247,500Education$62,625Arts & Culture$3,000Community Improvement$2,100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWISH CHILDREN'S REGIONAL SERVICE: $255,000 over 7y, 2.5% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $175,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetNATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH: $160,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $105,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY HOMES FOR ADULTS INC: $105,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetVOGEL ALCOVE: $95,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetPEDIPLACE INC: $69,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetDALLAS FURNITURE BANK: $49,000 over 7y, 4.0% of budgetTexas Health Resources Foundation: $39,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK: $32,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMENTAL HEALTH AMERICA OF GREATER DALLAS: $31,500 over 7y, 1.0% of budgetGRANT HALLIBURTON FOUNDATION INC: $29,500 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetOKLAHOMA CITY UNIVERSITY: $27,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetLAKE FOREST ACADEMY: $6,125 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH TEXAS PUBLIC BROADCASTING INC: $3,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSalesmanship Club of Dallas: $2,100 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetKIDNEYTEXAS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PINON TRAIL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH CHILDREN'S REGIONAL SERVICE ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY HOMES FOR ADULTS INC ↗
  • Who funds VOGEL ALCOVE ↗
  • Who funds PEDIPLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds DALLAS FURNITURE BANK ↗
  • Who funds Texas Health Resources Foundation ↗
  • Who funds NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds MENTAL HEALTH AMERICA OF GREATER DALLAS ↗
  • Who funds GRANT HALLIBURTON FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds OKLAHOMA CITY UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD ↗
  • Who funds LAKE FOREST ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds NORTH TEXAS PUBLIC BROADCASTING INC ↗
  • Who funds Salesmanship Club of Dallas ↗
  • Who funds KIDNEYTEXAS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Dallas FoundationTX13.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Dallas Foundation · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Shell USA Company Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Wal-Dot Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Wal-Dot Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Wal-Dot’s filings →

    More from the funding graph