· Private foundation
Wagmore Foundation Agency
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k3 grants · $19k
- $10k–50k8 grants · $157k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $233k
- $250k+1 grant · $1.5M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ALACHUA COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC | $1,459,279 |
| COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NORTH CE | $106,295 |
| GRACE MARKETPLACE | $77,000 |
| COMMUNITY SPRING | $50,000 |
| FOSTER PARROTS | $25,000 |
| RAINFOREST TRUST | $25,000 |
| AVIAN RESEARCH AND CONSERVATION | $25,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $20,000 |
| PAN AFRICAN SANCTUARY ALLIANCE | $20,000 |
| ASIA WILD | $17,000 |
| PAY TO SPAY | $15,000 |
| ARUKAH ANIMAL INTERNATIONAL | $10,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $7,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $7,300 |
| Individual grant recipient | $4,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–22, $57k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
18 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $57k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ACAlachua County Humane Society Inc5× · 2020–2024 · $2.7M · revenue +81% · 34% of their budget
- ECEPISCOPAL CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC2× · 2021–2022 · $57k · revenue +9%
BAT CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL2× · 2020–2021 · $32k · revenue +128%
Funded once
- CFCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NORTH CENTRAL FLone grant, 2020 · $118k
- PHPUPPY HILL FARM ANIMAL RESCUE INCgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $40k · revenue +37%
- PPASAone grant, 2020 · $37k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To end the suffering of captive wild animals around the world, by uniting the world's leading animal welfare organizations and captive wildlife facilities in providing expert, practical, and sustainable solutions to improve animal welfare.
HUMANE WORLD FOR ANIMALS INTERNATIONAL, FKA HUMANE SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL (HSI), works around the globe to promote the human-animal bond, rescue and protect dogs and cats, improve farm animal welfare, protect wildlife, promote animal-free…
A champion for animals since 1967, PAWS is a nationally recognized leader - rehabilitating injured and orphaned wildlife, sheltering and adopting homeless cats and dogs, and educating people to make a better world for animals and people.
Animal Survival International (ASI) works to help wildlife around the world whose survival is threatened by climate change, habitat destruction, the illegal wildlife trade, poor legislation and inadequate law enforcement.
The wildlife conservation society (wcs) saves wildlife and wild places worldwide through science, conservation action, education, and inspiring people to value nature.
The mission of the Lowry Park Zoological Society of Tampa a/k/a ZooTampa at Lowry Park, is to rescue, rehabilitate and care for animals.(Expanded mission on Schedule O)ZooTampa creates exceptional personalized experiences that connect…
To provide a platform to address the challenges of big cats tomorrow, and provide value to society today. Our primary mechanism is care and education surrounding captive wildlife through our mottos of Compassion, Conservation, and…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Elephant Sanctuary in Tennessee and the most unlike its peers is Dream On Purpose Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 26 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 27% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 50 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Alachua County Humane Society Inc ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NORTH CENTRAL FLORIDA ↗
- Who funds HAILES ANGELS PET RESCUE INC ↗
- Who funds PAN AFRICAN SANCTUARY ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds RAINFOREST TRUST ↗
- Who funds Community Spring Inc ↗
- Who funds EPISCOPAL CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds PUPPY HILL FARM ANIMAL RESCUE INC ↗
- Who funds Jungle Friends Primate Sanctuary ↗
- Who funds BAT CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds Fix Them All ↗
- Who funds THE ELEPHANT SANCTUARY IN TENNESSEE ↗
- Who funds COEXISTENCE STORY INC ↗
- Who funds BAT WORLD SANCTUARY ↗
- Who funds THE DAVID SHELDRICK WILDLIFE TRUST USA INC ↗
- Who funds Asia Wild ↗
- Who funds HIGH SPRINGS COMMUNITY THEATER HSCT ↗
- Who funds Rare Species Conservatory Foundation ↗
- Who funds ARUKAH ANIMAL INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds American Bird Conservancy ↗
- Who funds WINGS OF LOVE BIRD HAVEN INC ↗
- Who funds ARCAS WILD LIFE RESCUE AND CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION LTD AKA ARCAS ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation of North Central Florida · PC Fund for Animals Charitable Tr · Humane World for Animals Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Verizon Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Wagmore Foundation Agency funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Pan African Sanctuary Alliance Inc — 68% of income from government
- Episcopal Children's Services Inc — 42% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Wagmore Foundation Agency?
Find your warmest path to Wagmore Foundation Agency through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.