Skip to content

· Private foundation

WAG Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$21k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$57kCommunity Improvement$36kYouth Development$36kArts & Culture$20kEducation$18kPublic Benefit$17kCrime & Legal$14kHuman Services$13kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$45k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Greater Chicago Food Depository$4,500
Greater Boston Foodbank$2,500
Chicago Intl Puppet Theater Festival$2,000
Lyte Collective$2,000
Community Partners - Affordable Housing$2,000
Crossroads Fund$1,500
North Suburban Legal Aid$1,000
Highland Park Community Foundation$1,000
Forging Opp for Refugees in America$1,000
Moraine Township Food Pantry$1,000
Highwood Library and Comunity Center$1,000
Misericordia Heart of Mercy$1,000
The Simple Good$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Concordia Place: $1k → 14%Feeding People Through Plants: $1k → 14%Lyte Collective: $2k → 14%Lyte Collective: $2k → 14%Lyte Collective: $2k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$200k · 22 repeat orgs$45k to everyone else

22 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
15

Total granted

$200k
$42k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+71%

Still filing today

55%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
PhilanthropyArts & CultureHuman ServicesFood & NutritionCrime & LegalEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY
    4× · 2020–2025 · $30k · revenue +17%
  • CF
    CROSSROADS FUND INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $23k · revenue +167%
  • KO
    Kenwood Oakland Community Organization
    5× · 2017–2021 · $13k · revenue +263%

Funded once

  • MP
    MEDFORD PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue -91%
  • AC
    ARTS COLLABORATIVE MEDFORD INC
    one grant, 2024 · $7k · revenue 0%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF MEDFORD ROWING
    one grant, 2018 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Chicago United for Equity

Connecting and amplifying the power of individuals to build a just, equitable, and inclusive city.

Civil Rights
2
Chicago Refugee Coalition

The Chicago Refugee Coalition is a 501c3 non-profit organization dedicated ot the alleviation of human suffering through innovative partnerships, advocacy and community empowerment.

Human Services
3
A Better Chicago

A better chicago is changing how chicago fights poverty by investing in bold ideas that create opportunity for our youth.

Human Services
4
Chicago Parks Foundation

The Chicago Parks Foundation is a separate 501 (c) (3) non-profit organization that also serves as the strategic partner for the coordination of fundraising and charitable resources for the Chicago Park District.

Recreation & Sports
5
Chicago Cultural Alliance

The Chicago Cultural Alliances mission is to connect, promote, and support centers of cultural heritage for a more inclusive Chicago. We are an active consortium of 50 cultural heritage museums, centers, and historical societies that…

Arts & Culture
6
Gastro Intestinal Research Foundation Inc

The GI Research Foundation works to treat, prevent, and cure digestive diseases. In collaboration with the physicians and scientists at the University of Chicago Digestive Diseases Center, we fund innovative clinical and laboratory…

Health
7
Chicago Humanities Festival

To promote public appreciation, understanding and support of the humanities through festivals and educational programs.

Arts & Culture
8
The Chicago Bar Foundation

The chicago bar foundation brings the legal community together through advocacy, funding, and innovation to improve access to justice for people in need and to make the legal system more fair, equitable, and effective.

Education
9
Legal Aid Chicago

At legal aid chicago, we work together to provide high quality civil legal aid to people living in poverty and other vulnerable groups.through advocacy, education, collaboration, and litigation we empower individuals, protect fundamental…

Crime & Legal
10
Chicago Torture Justice Center

Seeks to address the traumas of police violence and institutionalized racism through access to healing and wellness services, trauma-informed resources, and community connection. The Center is a part of and supports a movement to end all…

Crime & Legal
11
Chicago Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights Under Law Inc

Secure racial equity and economic opportunity for all

Crime & Legal
12
The Commons Project Foundation

The Commons Project Foundation is a 501(c)3 non-profit charitable organization established to build and operate digital services for the common good. Our mission is to empower individuals with access and control of their data, beginning…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Crossroads Fund Inc; the most unlike its peers is Health Professionals Network for Tigray. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/24
Grantees still filing
18/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Lakota Youthstay: $25,000 · OtherLakota YouthstayCROSSROADS FUND INC: $23,000 · OtherCROSSROADS FUND INCConstitutional Rights Foundation Chicago: $11,000 · OtherConstitutional Rights Foundation ChicagoCommunity Partners - Affordable Hou: $10,000 · OtherCommunity Partners - Affordable HouNorth Suburban Legal Aid: $7,750 · OtherNorth Suburban Legal AidFoodlink: $7,000 · OtherFriends of Highland Park Library: $6,000 · OtherMisericordia Heart of Mercy: $5,000 · OtherThe Simple Good: $5,000 · OtherTeach Democracy: $5,000 · Other+16 more: $32,500 · Other+16 moreGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $29,500 · Food & NutritionGREATER CHICAG…FOOD FOR FREE COMMITTEE INC: $3,000 · Food & NutritionFOOD FOR FREE …MORAINE TOWNSHIP CHARITABLE FUND CHARITABLE FUND: $11,500 · PhilanthropyMORAINE TOWNS…THE CLEAR FUND: $9,000 · PhilanthropyTHE CLEAR FUN…Highland Park Community Foundation: $7,500 · PhilanthropyHighland Park…HAROLD E EISENBERG FOUNDATION: $1,000 · PhilanthropyChicago International Puppet Theater Festival: $10,750 · Arts & CultureChicago Inte…MEDFORD PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · Arts & CultureMEDFORD PUBL…ARTS COLLABORATIVE MEDFORD INC: $7,000 · Arts & CultureARTS COLLABO…Kenwood Oakland Community Organization: $13,000 · Community ImprovementTHE LYTE COLLECTIVE: $5,750 · Human ServicesCONCORDIA PLACE: $1,000 · Human ServicesFEEDING PEOPLE THROUGH PLANTS NFP: $1,000 · Human ServicesFRIENDS OF MEDFORD ROWING: $5,500 · Education
Other$137,250Food & Nutrition$32,500Philanthropy$29,000Arts & Culture$27,750Community Improvement$13,000Human Services$7,750Education$5,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $29,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCROSSROADS FUND INC: $23,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetKenwood Oakland Community Organization: $13,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetMORAINE TOWNSHIP CHARITABLE FUND CHARITABLE FUND: $11,500 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetConstitutional Rights Foundation Chicago: $11,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetChicago International Puppet Theater Festival: $10,750 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetTHE CLEAR FUND: $9,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHighland Park Community Foundation: $7,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetARTS COLLABORATIVE MEDFORD INC: $7,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetTHE LYTE COLLECTIVE: $5,750 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetThe Simple Good: $5,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetTeach Democracy: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC: $4,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCLIMATE VAULT: $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITIES FOR RESTORATIVE JUSTICE INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetFOOD FOR FREE COMMITTEE INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMPASS TO CARE: $1,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCONCORDIA PLACE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHAROLD E EISENBERG FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFEEDING PEOPLE THROUGH PLANTS NFP: $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY ↗
  • Who funds CROSSROADS FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds Kenwood Oakland Community Organization ↗
  • Who funds MORAINE TOWNSHIP CHARITABLE FUND CHARITABLE FUND ↗
  • Who funds Constitutional Rights Foundation Chicago ↗
  • Who funds Chicago International Puppet Theater Festival ↗
  • Who funds MEDFORD PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CLEAR FUND ↗
  • Who funds Highland Park Community Foundation ↗
  • Who funds ARTS COLLABORATIVE MEDFORD INC ↗
  • Who funds THE LYTE COLLECTIVE ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF MEDFORD ROWING ↗
  • Who funds The Simple Good ↗
  • Who funds Teach Democracy ↗
  • Who funds GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds CLIMATE VAULT ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITIES FOR RESTORATIVE JUSTICE INC ↗
  • Who funds FOOD FOR FREE COMMITTEE INC ↗
  • Who funds COMPASS TO CARE ↗
  • Who funds CONCORDIA PLACE ↗
  • Who funds EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds HAROLD E EISENBERG FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FEEDING PEOPLE THROUGH PLANTS NFP ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Julian Grace FoundationIL13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Julian Grace Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization WAG Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from WAG Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 8%
  • Greater Boston Food Bank Inc: 22% of income from government
  • Communities for Restorative Justice Inc: 8% of income from government
  • Food for Free Committee Inc: 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to WAG Foundation?

Find your warmest path to WAG Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on WAG’s filings →

More from the funding graph