Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

Voter Registration Project

VOTER REGISTRATION PROJECT's purpose is to carry out nonpartisan voter registration programs and assist other nonprofit organizations in planning, implementing and evaluating such programs.

$44M
Granted FY2024still arriving
65
Grants FY2024still arriving
15
States reached
$3.4M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Public Benefit$169MEnvironment$11MCivil Rights$767kCommunity Improvement$114kPhilanthropy$70k
02FY2024 · 65 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $85k
  • $50k–250k20 grants · $2.9M
  • $250k+42 grants · $41M
$465,618
Median grant
15
States reached
$9.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NC A PHILIP RANDOLPH INSTITUTE INC$3,423,961
VOTER FORMATION PROJECT$3,120,000
LEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS EDUCATION FUND$2,796,605
MI FAMILIA VOTA EDUCATION FUND$2,623,792
NEW GEORGIA PROJECT$2,407,181
UNIDOSUS$2,097,471
STATE VOICES$1,651,053
BLACK MEN VOTE$1,549,361
BATTLEGROUND TX ENGAGEMENT FUND$1,480,099
FLORIDA RISING TOGETHER$1,097,999
NEXTGEN EDUCATION FUND$1,078,317
JOLT INITIATIVE INC$998,147
ENGAGE FLORIDA CIVIC FUND$968,890
TIDES FOUNDATION$896,248
CHISPA NEVADA A PROGRAM OF THE LEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS EDUCATION FUND$797,840
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $6.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 94% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ACTIONN: $140k → 10%STUDENT ORGANIZING INC: $369k → 16%COUNCIL ON AMERICAN-ISLAMIC RELATIONS PENNSYLVANIA: $48k → 22%THE FIRST COAST LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION JACKSONVILLE: $606k → 14%ACTIONN: $60k → 10%MAKE THE ROAD PENNSYLVANIA: $616k → 20%THE FIRST COAST LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION JACKSONVILLE: $403k → 14%ACTIONN: $51k → 10%MAKE THE ROAD PENNSYLVANIA: $455k → 20%THE FIRST COAST LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION JACKSONVILLE: $316k → 14%THE FIRST COAST LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION JACKSONVILLE: $303k → 14%ACTIONN: $129k → 10%THE FIRST COAST LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION JACKSONVILLE: $295k → 14%GEORGIA COALITION FOR THE PEOPLE'S AGENDA: $611k → 13%THE FIRST COAST LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION JACKSONVILLE: $193k → 14%GEORGIA COALITION FOR THE PEOPLE'S AGENDA: $406k → 13%THE FIRST COAST LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION JACKSONVILLE: $173k → 14%GEORGIA COALITION FOR THE PEOPLE'S AGENDA: $355k → 13%GEORGIA COALITION FOR THE PEOPLE'S AGENDA: $189k → 13%VOTO LATINO FOUNDATION: $150k → 14%GEORGIA COALITION FOR THE PEOPLE'S AGENDA: $172k → 13%GEORGIA COALITION FOR THE PEOPLE'S AGENDA: $140k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
MN
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
OH
PA
CA
CO
VA
MD
AZ
NC
DC
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$159M · 63 repeat orgs$15M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +97% since the first grant, against +18% for the ones you funded once.

63 repeat relationships — 40 still active in FY2024, 23 since wound down; 18 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

63
28

Total granted

$159M
$8.7M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+97%
+18%

Still filing today

90%
64%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6.1M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Civil RightsEducationCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesEnvironmentPublic BenefitOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SV
    STATE VOICES
    8× · 2017–2024 · $28M · revenue +57% · 30% of their budget
  • LO
    LEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS EDUCATION FUND
    7× · 2018–2024 · $18M · revenue +121%
  • MF
    MI FAMILIA EN ACCION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $11M · revenue +516% · 89% of their budget

Funded once

  • FS
    FAIR SHARE EDUCATION FUND INC
    one grant, 2018 · $2.8M
  • TO
    THE OUTREACH TEAM
    one grant, 2023 · $1.6M
  • CENTER FOR POPULAR DEMOCRACY INC
    one grant, 2020 · $742k · revenue 0%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
America Votes

The Organization was established to coordinate and promote progressive issues, policies, initiatives, and referenda, and to pursue electoral reform that expands access to the ballot.

Community Improvement
2
League of Women Voters of New Jersey

Through grassroots people-powered advocacy and organizing, lwvnj trains, mobilizes, and educates advocates to have a greater voice in government and influence public policy.

—
3
Nextgen Climate Action

Nextgen america empowers young people to engage in the democratic process through voter registration and civic engagement on issues of public policy. this is achieved through innovative digital outreach, communications, and grassroots…

Unclassified
4
Civica Initiatives

Empower people and strengthen democratic institutions

Community Improvement
5
Our Voice Our Vote Arizona

Our voice our vote arizona engages in community organizing, leadership development, and civic participation efforts. the organization focuses on voter registration, education, and engagement to strengthen communities and encourage active…

Civil Rights
6
Powerswitch Action

Powerswitch action is a national network forging collective democracy and economies in our cities and states, together with our 21 grassroots affiliates.

Community Improvement
7
Chicago Votes

Chicago Votes is a non-partisan, non-profit organization building a more inclusive democracy by putting power in the hands of young Chicagoans. We're engaging and developing a new generation of leaders by opening the doors of government,…

Civil Rights
8
Alabama Values

A nonpartisan grassroots communication organization that works to raise awareness and increase engagement around community issues in alabama by working directly with civic organizations advocating civic participation in communities across…

Arts & Culture
9
Civic Tn

Civictn and its partners are working individually and collectively to create a more accessible, inclusive, and representative democracy by lifting up the voices of the disenfranchised, restoring the power and accessibility of the vote, and…

Civil Rights
10
More Than a Vote

Educate, energize, and protect voters as they headed to the ballot box. but, as our name makes clear, we were always about more than voting.

Civil Rights
11
Democracy Works Inc

The organization's mission is to leverage web-technologies to improve civic engagement and voter education.

Civil Rights
12
Bold Impact

Bold Impact is a national nonprofit dedicated to supporting a democracy where all communities get to thrive.

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Accelerate Change Inc and the most unlike its peers is Saba K7 Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsWomen & Girls Leadership De…Environmental Conservation …Child Abuse Advocacy Servic…Immigrant Worker SupportLgbtq+ Community SupportYouth Development ServicesPolicy Research and Advocacy
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 13 years old; the field is 16. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%17%<5yr14%24%5–10yr19%24%10–20yr16%21%20–35yr13%14%35–55yr16%1%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%6%<5yr14%23%5–10yr19%20%10–20yr16%30%20–35yr13%18%35–55yr16%4%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 17% of your grantees by number, and just 6% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 4% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
4%
5/113
the rest of the field
13%
240,393/1,819,452

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

101 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 101 of the 113 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

32
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
43
Early backer (in before they grew)
92/101
Grantees still filing
65/101
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

STATE VOICES — $27,506,923 · Civil RightsSTATE VOICESMI FAMILIA EN ACCION — $11,025,873 · Civil RightsMI FAMILIA EN ACCIONN C A PHILIP RANDOLPH INSTITUTE INC — $8,555,961 · Civil RightsN C A PHILIP RANDOLPH INSTITUTE INCNEW GEORGIA PROJECT INC — $6,575,224 · Civil RightsNEW GEORGIA PROJECT INCFLORIDA RISING TOGETHER INC — $4,695,188 · Civil RightsONE ARIZONA — $4,252,528 · Civil RightsARIZONA CENTER FOR EMPOWERMENT — $4,217,765 · Civil RightsVOTER FORMATION PROJECT — $4,110,000 · Civil Rights+33 more — $25,645,073 · Civil Rights+33 moreLEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS EDUCATION FUND — $18,352,970 · EnvironmentLEAGUE OF CONSER…GOODPOWER EDUCATION FUND INC — $3,013,649 · EnvironmentGOODPOWER EDUCAT…THE ALLIANCE FOR CLIMATE PROTECTION — $2,978,311 · EnvironmentTHE ALLIANCE FOR…FAITH ORGANIZING ALLIANCE — $957,071 · Environment+1 more — $504,858 · EnvironmentUNIDOSUS — $5,761,727 · OtherUNIDOSUSFLORIDA INSTITUTE FOR REFORM AND EM DBA ORGANIZE FLORIDA EDUCATION FUND — $1,868,062 · OtherFLORIDA INSTITUTE …REAL WOMEN RADIO FOUNDATION — $1,599,340 · OtherREAL WOMEN RADIO F…THE OUTREACH TEAM — $1,569,798 · OtherTHE OUTREACH TEAMBGTX Engagement Fund — $1,480,099 · OtherCASA INC — $1,034,842 · OtherTIDES FOUNDATION — $3,400,534 · OtherTIDES FOUNDATIONHOPEWELL FUND — $2,552,625 · OtherHOPEWELL FUNDGeorgia Strategic Alliance for New — $1,756,340 · OtherGeorgia Strategic …Make the Road New York — $1,100,990 · Other+30 more — $6,988,426 · Other+30 moreWORKER POWER INSTITUTE — $2,686,542 · Community ImprovementHISPANIC FEDERATION INC — $2,206,145 · Community ImprovementUNIFOUR ONE INC — $1,908,022 · Community ImprovementASIAN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL — $1,439,020 · Community ImprovementDETROIT CHANGE INITIATIVE — $483,437 · Community Improvement+3 more — $116,125 · Community ImprovementThe First Coast Leadership Foundation Jacksonville Inc — $2,289,472 · Human ServicesGeorgia Coalition for the People's Agenda — $1,873,676 · Human ServicesTIDES CENTER — $1,277,844 · Human ServicesMake The Road States Inc — $1,070,895 · Human ServicesACTING IN COMMUNITY TOGETHER IN ORGANIZING NORTHERN NEVADA — $529,715 · Human ServicesSTUDENT ORGANIZING INC — $368,845 · Human Services+1 more — $48,301 · Human ServicesFAIR SHARE EDUCATION FUND INC — $2,754,000 · EducationVIRGINIA NEW MAJORITY EDUCATION FUND — $1,611,883 · EducationBLUEPRINT NORTH CAROLINA — $1,257,381 · EducationForward Together Wisconsin — $480,000 · EducationMinnesota State College Student Association Inc — $352,914 · EducationPHILANTHROPY KIDS — $232,198 · Education+2 more — $246,771 · EducationTHE OHIO ORGANIZING COLLABORATIVE — $3,934,997 · Public BenefitNEO Philanthropy Inc — $1,564,721 · Public BenefitCENTER FOR POPULAR DEMOCRACY INC — $741,725 · Public BenefitMinnesota Voice — $581,549 · Public Benefit
Civil Rights$96,584,535Environment$25,806,859Other$29,112,783Community Improvement$8,839,291Human Services$7,458,748Education$6,935,147Public Benefit$6,822,992

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSTATE VOICES — $27,506,923 over 8y, 30% of budgetLEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS EDUCATION FUND — $18,352,970 over 7y, 15% of budgetMI FAMILIA EN ACCION — $11,025,873 over 8y, 89% of budgetN C A PHILIP RANDOLPH INSTITUTE INC — $8,555,961 over 8y, 38% of budgetNEW GEORGIA PROJECT INC — $6,575,224 over 6y, 57% of budgetUNIDOSUS — $5,761,727 over 6y, 2.9% of budgetFLORIDA RISING TOGETHER INC — $4,695,188 over 7y, 9.0% of budgetONE ARIZONA — $4,252,528 over 8y, 8.7% of budgetARIZONA CENTER FOR EMPOWERMENT — $4,217,765 over 5y, 39% of budgetVOTER FORMATION PROJECT — $4,110,000 over 2y, 46% of budgetTHE OHIO ORGANIZING COLLABORATIVE — $3,934,997 over 4y, 29% of budgetTIDES FOUNDATION — $3,400,534 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetGOODPOWER EDUCATION FUND INC — $3,013,649 over 5y, 35% of budgetTHE ALLIANCE FOR CLIMATE PROTECTION — $2,978,311 over 3y, 6.3% of budgetPROGEORGIA STATE TABLE INC — $2,886,584 over 8y, 6.3% of budgetWORKER POWER INSTITUTE — $2,686,542 over 6y, 71% of budgetHOPEWELL FUND — $2,552,625 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetThe First Coast Leadership Foundation Jacksonville Inc — $2,289,472 over 7y, 100% of budgetHISPANIC FEDERATION INC — $2,206,145 over 8y, 2.0% of budgetUNIFOUR ONE INC — $1,908,022 over 7y, 68% of budgetGeorgia Coalition for the People's Agenda — $1,873,676 over 6y, 21% of budgetFLORIDA INSTITUTE FOR REFORM AND EM DBA ORGANIZE FLORIDA EDUCATION FUND — $1,868,062 over 4y, 24% of budgetARIZONA COALITION FOR CHANGE — $1,804,702 over 6y, 35% of budgetBLACK MEN VOTE — $1,794,871 over 2y, 44% of budgetGeorgia Strategic Alliance for New — $1,756,340 over 8y, 18% of budgetVIRGINIA NEW MAJORITY EDUCATION FUND — $1,611,883 over 3y, 24% of budgetNEO Philanthropy Inc — $1,564,721 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetBGTX Engagement Fund — $1,480,099 over 1y, 87% of budgetNEXTGEN EDUCATION FUND — $1,469,169 over 2y, 5.3% of budgetONE PENNSYLVANIA ACTIVISTS UNITED — $1,467,878 over 2y, 26% of budgetASIAN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL — $1,439,020 over 7y, 19% of budgetACCELERATE CHANGE INC — $1,415,000 over 3y, 3.2% of budgetFlorida Immigrant Coalition Inc — $1,396,316 over 4y, 15% of budgetTIDES CENTER — $1,277,844 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetJOLT INITIATIVE — $1,272,599 over 2y, 36% of budgetBLUEPRINT NORTH CAROLINA — $1,257,381 over 6y, 45% of budgetVOTE REV ACTION FUND — $1,247,475 over 2y, 25% of budgetPENNSYLVANIA VOICE — $1,184,490 over 5y, 5.6% of budgetTHE COLLECTIVE EDUCATION FUND — $1,130,000 over 2y, 17% of budgetMake the Road New York — $1,100,990 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetMake The Road States Inc — $1,070,895 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetCASA INC — $1,034,842 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetENGAGE FLORIDA CIVIC FUND INC — $968,890 over 1y, 17% of budgetFAITH ORGANIZING ALLIANCE — $957,071 over 3y, 69% of budgetRURAL ARIZONA ENGAGEMENT — $856,331 over 4y, 9.0% of budgetWISCONSIN VOICES INC — $851,244 over 3y, 35% of budgetNew PA Project Education Fund — $821,630 over 2y, 24% of budgetASIAN AND PACIFIC ISLANDER AMERICAN VOTE - MICHIGAN — $784,120 over 2y, 25% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds STATE VOICES ↗
  • Who funds LEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS EDUCATION FUND ↗
  • Who funds MI FAMILIA EN ACCION ↗
  • Who funds N C A PHILIP RANDOLPH INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW GEORGIA PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIDOSUS ↗
  • Who funds FLORIDA RISING TOGETHER INC ↗
  • Who funds ONE ARIZONA ↗
  • Who funds ARIZONA CENTER FOR EMPOWERMENT ↗
  • Who funds VOTER FORMATION PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds THE OHIO ORGANIZING COLLABORATIVE ↗
  • Who funds TIDES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GOODPOWER EDUCATION FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ALLIANCE FOR CLIMATE PROTECTION ↗
  • Who funds PROGEORGIA STATE TABLE INC ↗
  • Who funds FAIR SHARE EDUCATION FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds WORKER POWER INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds HOPEWELL FUND ↗
  • Who funds The First Coast Leadership Foundation Jacksonville Inc ↗
  • Who funds HISPANIC FEDERATION INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIFOUR ONE INC ↗
  • Who funds Georgia Coalition for the People's Agenda ↗
  • Who funds FLORIDA INSTITUTE FOR REFORM AND EM DBA ORGANIZE FLORIDA EDUCATION FUND ↗
  • Who funds ARIZONA COALITION FOR CHANGE ↗
  • Who funds BLACK MEN VOTE ↗
  • Who funds Georgia Strategic Alliance for New ↗
  • Who funds VIRGINIA NEW MAJORITY EDUCATION FUND ↗
  • Who funds NEO Philanthropy Inc ↗
  • Who funds BGTX Engagement Fund ↗
  • Who funds NEXTGEN EDUCATION FUND ↗
  • Who funds ONE PENNSYLVANIA ACTIVISTS UNITED ↗
  • Who funds ASIAN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds ACCELERATE CHANGE INC ↗
  • Who funds Florida Immigrant Coalition Inc ↗
  • Who funds TIDES CENTER ↗
  • Who funds JOLT INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds BLUEPRINT NORTH CAROLINA ↗
  • Who funds VOTE REV ACTION FUND ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

NEO Philanthropy IncTides FoundationNew Venture FundVoter Registration Pr…Amalgamated Charitabl…State VoicesWindward FundHopewell FundUnited States Energy …The Prentice Foundati…Alliance for Youth Or…Civic Nation
NEO Philanthropy IncNY75.3× affinity40 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: NEO Philanthropy Inc · Tides Foundation · New Venture Fund · Voter Registration Project Education Fund · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · State Voices · Windward Fund · Hopewell Fund · United States Energy Foundation · The Prentice Foundation Inc · Alliance for Youth Organizing · Civic Nation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Voter Registration Project funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 8%
  • Casa Inc — 8% of income from government
  • Alianza Center Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
14report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 113 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines