Loading…
· Private foundation
VOSKUHL-STAAB CHARITABLE FOUNDATION
This foundation does not accept unsolicited requests — it funds preselected organizations.
$470k
Granted FY2024
30
Grants
6
Communities
$60k
Largest
01What you fund
01
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 90% of VOSKUHL-STAAB CHARITABLE FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2018
religious education
2019
religious education-general
2020
religious education-generalhigher education
2021
private education-generalreligious education-generalhigher education
2022
religious education-general
2023
private education-generalreligious education-generalhigher education
2024
private education-generalreligious education-general
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2024 · 30 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k16 grants · $51k
- $10k–50k9 grants · $157k
- $50k–250k5 grants · $263k
$7,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$6.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
- PARISH OF CHRIST THE KING$60,000
- CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF TULSA$52,500
- AUGUSTINE INSTITUTE$50,000
- CATHOLIC CHARITIES$50,000
- ST JOHN STUDENT CENTER$50,000
- CASCIA HALL PREPARATORY SCHOOL$30,000
- BISHOP KELLEY$25,000
- NEWMAN CENTER UNIVERSITY OF TULSA$21,500
- CLOEPATRA FOUNDATION INC$20,000
- ST GREGORY'S ABBEY$20,000
- FRIENDS OF CATHOLIC$10,000
- STANLEY ROTHER$10,000
- SAN MIGUEL SCHOOL$10,000
- MEMORIAL BOYS BASKETBALL$10,000
- MEMORIAL MIDDLE SCHOOL STEM$7,000
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $57k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15% — the area typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
83%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.2M · 35 repeat orgs$465k to everyone else
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +86% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
35 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2024, 16 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
35
39
Total granted
$2.2M
$355k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+86%
0%
Still filing today
23%
21%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $110k went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
EducationHuman ServicesInternationalPhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementHousing & ShelterOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CCCatholic Charities8× · 2017–2024 · $278k · revenue +195%
Augustine Institute7× · 2017–2024 · $165k · revenue +86%- GLGo Life Mobile Medical Inc6× · 2017–2023 · $50k · revenue +125%
Funded once
- SGSt Gregory's Universityone grant, 2017 · $113k
- PCPORTA CAELI HOUSEone grant, 2020 · $50k
- SPSt Pius X Parishone grant, 2017 · $50k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
St Thomas University Inc
St. thomas university, inc. is a catholic university with rich cultural and international diversity committed to the academic and professional success of its students who become ethical leaders in our global community.
—
2
St Augustine Manor
St. Augustine Manor dba St. Augustine Health Ministries provides skilled nursing and community based services including; early education and child day care, assisted living, rehabilitation, long-term care, home care and hospice care.
Human Services
3
The City Lights Foundation of Oklahoma
We serve tulsa's homeless and low-income community through multiple programs that provide basic needs, build relationships and provide hope and restoration.
Human Services
4
La Luz Organization Inc
La Luz Organization helps the underserved Latino population in Oklahoma with culturally and faith based trauma-informed services to victims of domestic violence,sexual assault and stalking.
Human Services
5
Ronald McDonald House Charities of Tulsa
Ronald McDonald House Charities of Tulsa provides essential services that remove barriers, strengthen families, and promote healing when children need healthcare.
—
6
University of Tulsa
The University of Tulsa is a student-centered research university that cultivates interconnected learning experiences to explore complex ideas and create new knowledge in a spirit of free inquiry. Guided by our commitment to diversity,…
Education
7
Timothy Christian Schools
Develop academically prepared Christian disciples who embrace Christ's call to transform the world
—
8
Goodwill Industries of Tulsa Inc
Goodwill empowers people to reach their full potential through work opportunities, training, and support services.
Employment
9
Tulsa Legacy Charter School
To prepare students for college through a rigorous arts infused program.
Education
10
Catholic Charities of Central and
Inspired by the Gospel of the Beatitudes as proclaimed by Jesus Christ, Catholic Charities of Central and Northern Missouri is committed to providing care and creating hope for the lives of the vulnerable through compassionate social…
Human Services
11
Villa St Francis Catholic Care
Villa st francis, a catholic, non-profit skilled nursing facility sponsored by the archdiocese of kansas city in olathe, provides dementia care, skilled nursing, respite, and hospice.
Housing & Shelter
12
The San Miguel School of Tulsa
San miguel tulsa is dedicated to helping children from challening environments, regardless of race or religion, to achieve academic and personal success through a non-tuition driven, lasallian education.
Religion
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Tulsa Boys' Home Inc and the most unlike its peers is Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
19 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/19
Grantees still filing
11/19
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Other$2,399,550Education$183,000Human Services$56,500International$9,500Philanthropy$7,500Community Improvement$7,000Housing & Shelter$5,000Public Benefit$2,000
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Catholic Charities ↗
- Who funds Augustine Institute ↗
- Who funds St Gregory's University ↗
- Who funds Go Life Mobile Medical Inc ↗
- Who funds DREXEL ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION RESOURCE ASSOC ↗
- Who funds KONTUM MISSIONARY AND FRIENDSHIP ↗
- Who funds TULSA DAY CENTER ↗
- Who funds MERCY SHIPS FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Tulsa Community FoundationOK23.3× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Tulsa Community Foundation · Ralph and Frances McGill Foundation · Grace & Franklin Bernsen Foundation · George Kaiser Family Foundation · Kathleen S Craft Foundation · Moran Family Foundation · The Hardesty Family Foundation Inc · The Anne and Henry Zarrow Foundation · A R and Marylouise Tandy Foundation · The Charles & Marion Weber Foundation · Tulsa Economic Development Corporation · Mervin Bovaird Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation VOSKUHL-STAAB CHARITABLE FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
- Tulsa Day Center Inc — 9% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
10get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: Go Life Mobile Medical Inc.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
medium risk
~4 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 8 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
8 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 2.3× since.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 453368840 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on Go Life Mobile Medical Inc, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- WatchFinancial stability— Roughly 4 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 5% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Voskuhl-Staab Charitable Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Voskuhl-Staab Charitable Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines