Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Kathleen S Craft Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$6.0M
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$2.0M
Largest
01What you fund
0186% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Religion$8.0MInternational$2.5MEmployment$2.2MHousing & Shelter$2.0MEducation$1.8MPhilanthropy$1.8MHuman Services$1.4MHealth$1.3MOther$0
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $258
  • $250k+7 grants · $6.0M
$1,000,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$131M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE SPRING$2,000,000
A NEW LEAF$1,000,000
INSTITUTE OF PATIENTS RIGHTS$1,000,000
THE CITY LIGHTS FOUNDATION OF OKLAH$1,000,000
Individual grant recipient$500,000
REAL LIFE CATHOLICS$250,000
Individual grant recipient$250,000
PASSTHROUGH FROM K-1'S$258
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–20, $98k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CENTER OF FAMILY LOVE: $25k → 9%STAND IN THE GAP: $20k → 15%GO LIFE MOBILE MEDICAL: $10k → 15%LIFE SENIOR SERVICES: $5k → 15%FAMILY AND CHILDREN SERVICES: $26k → 15%FAMILY AND CHILDREN SERVICES: $6k → 15%FAMILY AND CHILDREN SERVICES: $6k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
IL
NY
SD
OH
PA
CA
CO
KY
VA
MD
AR
NC
DC
OK
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$20M · 26 repeat orgs$7.5M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +95% since the first grant, against +35% for the ones you funded once.

26 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 19 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
43

Total granted

$20M
$5.5M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+95%
+35%

Still filing today

46%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.0M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationReligionHealthPhilanthropyArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CL
    CATHOLIC LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE
    4× · 2017–2022 · $2.6M · revenue +216%
  • Augustine Institute Inc
    4× · 2017–2020 · $2.5M · revenue +321%
  • A NEW LEAF INC
    3× · 2019–2024 · $2.2M · revenue +108%

Funded once

  • SO
    SISTER OF MARY BOYSTOWN AND GIRLSTOWN INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $1.5M · revenue +39%
  • OS
    Oklahoma State University Foundation
    one grant, 2023 · $1.0M · revenue -3%
  • HI
    HEARTBEAT INTERNATIONAL MISSIONS
    one grant, 2023 · $1.0M

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Life International

To partner with leaders globally to boldly proclaim the biblical truth of the father's heart for life, champion the gospel of jesus christ, and establish life-giving ministries.

Health
2
The Institute for Advanced Catholic Studies

The institute's mission is to conduct research on key issues facing society to help both the church and society deal thoughtfully with the major issues they face globally. the institute also sponsors and conducts research and scholarship…

Religion
3
Saint Francis Hospital Inc

To extend the presence and healing ministry of christ in all we do.

Health
4
Lumen Christi Institute

To make the catholic intellectual tradition a vital part of the culture of universities. to enrich academic communities at the university of chicago, across the nation, and the world with the insights of catholic thought. to dialogue with…

5
Saint Francis Health System Inc

Saint Francis Health System, Inc.'s mission is to extend the presence and healing ministry of Christ in all we do. In keeping with Saint Francis Health System, Inc.'s mission, it operates to the ethical and religious directives for…

Health
6
Brite Divinity School

Brite divinity school educates and inspires people to serve god's diverse world as leaders in churches, the academy, and public life.

Education
7
Tulsa Educare Inc

Tulsa educare, inc.'s mission is to transform lives through high-quality early childhood education, meaningful family engagement, and impactful early learning supports.

Youth Development
8
Catholic Answers Inc

Catholic answers is an apostolate dedicated to serving christ by bringing the fullness of catholic truth to the world. we help good catholics become better catholics, bring former catholics home, and lead non-catholics into the fullness of…

9
Goodwill Industries of Tulsa Inc

Goodwill empowers people to reach their full potential through work opportunities, training, and support services.

Employment
10
The Parent Child Ctr of Tulsa Inc Endowment Trust

Supporting organization for the parent child center of tulsa providing services for the prevention of child abuse and neglect through education, treatment, and advocacy.

Human Services
11
Phillips Theological Seminary Corporation

The seminary's mission is to learn and teach how to be: attentive to god; responsible biblical and theological interpreters; faithful individuals, congregations, and communities acting with god to transform the world.

Education
12
Catholic Charities of Kansas City - St Joseph Inc

Helping people move to a better life through hope-filled care, services, and advocacy; calling all those of goodwill to join us

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mental Health Association in Tulsa Inc dba Mental Health Association Oklahoma and the most unlike its peers is The Dynamic Catholic Institute. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyDevelopmental Disabilities …Public University Foundatio…Community Health CentersSenior Support ServicesFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Pregnancy Support ServicesIndependent K-8 SchoolsChild and Family ServicesSubstance Abuse TreatmentCancer Support OrganizationsEducation Equity LeadershipChristian Missionary Organi…Community Arts OrganizationsCommunity Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number21%3%<5yr13%3%5–10yr17%23%10–20yr16%29%20–35yr14%20%35–55yr19%23%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value21%5%<5yr13%0%5–10yr17%22%10–20yr16%43%20–35yr14%23%35–55yr19%8%55yr+

The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 5% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/39
the rest of the field
13%
2,509/19,383

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 71 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/32
Grantees still filing
25/32
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

A NEW LEAF INC — $2,200,000 · OtherA NEW LEAF INCIndividual grant recipient — $2,000,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHE SPRING — $2,000,000 · OtherTHE SPRINGIndividual grant recipient — $1,810,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCHURCH OF ST MARY — $1,210,000 · OtherCHURCH OF ST MARYHEARTBEAT INTERNATIONAL MISSIONS — $1,000,000 · OtherHEARTBEAT INTERNATIONAL MISSIONSCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF OKLAHOMA CITY INC — $740,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $600,000 · Other+40 more — $3,689,781 · Other+40 moreAugustine Institute Inc — $2,490,439 · EducationAugustine Inst…Oklahoma State University Foundation — $1,000,000 · EducationOklahoma State…Teach for America Inc — $150,000 · Education+3 more — $110,000 · EducationCATHOLIC LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE — $2,625,000 · ReligionCATHOLIC LEAD…Real Life Catholic — $750,000 · ReligionReal Life Cat…+1 more — $50,000 · ReligionTHE CITY LIGHTS FOUNDATION OF OKLAHOMA — $2,000,000 · Human Services+6 more — $108,000 · Human ServicesTULSA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $1,817,641 · PhilanthropySCOTT CARTER FOUNDATION — $100,000 · Philanthropy+1 more — $10,000 · PhilanthropySISTER OF MARY BOYSTOWN AND GIRLSTOWN INC — $1,500,000 · InternationalINSTITUTE FOR PATIENTS' RIGHTS INC — $1,005,000 · HealthMental Health Association in Tulsa Inc dba Mental Health Association Oklahoma — $100,000 · Health+1 more — $2,500 · Health
Other$15,249,781Education$3,750,439Religion$3,425,000Human Services$2,108,000Philanthropy$1,927,641International$1,500,000Health$1,107,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCATHOLIC LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE — $2,625,000 over 4y, 18% of budgetAugustine Institute Inc — $2,490,439 over 4y, 6.6% of budgetA NEW LEAF INC — $2,200,000 over 3y, 6.3% of budgetTHE CITY LIGHTS FOUNDATION OF OKLAHOMA — $2,000,000 over 2y, 47% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR PATIENTS' RIGHTS INC — $1,005,000 over 2y, 44% of budgetOklahoma State University Foundation — $1,000,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF OKLAHOMA CITY INC — $740,000 over 3y, 2.9% of budgetTULSA CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC — $500,000 over 2y, 3.8% of budgetTeach for America Inc — $150,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMental Health Association in Tulsa Inc dba Mental Health Association Oklahoma — $100,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetThe Becket Fund — $100,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetSCOTT CARTER FOUNDATION — $100,000 over 1y, 27% of budget40 DAYS FOR LIFE — $60,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetLITTLE LIGHT HOUSE INC — $50,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetTHE DYNAMIC CATHOLIC INSTITUTE — $50,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTULSA LEGACY CHARTER SCHOOL — $40,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetFamily & Childrens Services Inc — $38,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe Center of Family Love — $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetStudents for Life of America Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHOMAS AQUINAS COLLEGE — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTULSA BOYS' HOME INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGO LIFE MOBILE MEDICAL INC — $10,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetFriends of Catholic Education — $10,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetLIFE SENIOR SERVICES INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNEW HOPE OKLAHOMA INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CATHOLIC LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE
  • Who funds Augustine Institute Inc
  • Who funds A NEW LEAF INC
  • Who funds THE CITY LIGHTS FOUNDATION OF OKLAHOMA
  • Who funds TULSA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds SISTER OF MARY BOYSTOWN AND GIRLSTOWN INC
  • Who funds INSTITUTE FOR PATIENTS' RIGHTS INC
  • Who funds Oklahoma State University Foundation
  • Who funds Real Life Catholic
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF OKLAHOMA CITY INC
  • Who funds TULSA CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC
  • Who funds Teach for America Inc
  • Who funds Mental Health Association in Tulsa Inc dba Mental Health Association Oklahoma
  • Who funds The Becket Fund
  • Who funds SCOTT CARTER FOUNDATION
  • Who funds 40 DAYS FOR LIFE
  • Who funds LITTLE LIGHT HOUSE INC
  • Who funds THE DYNAMIC CATHOLIC INSTITUTE
  • Who funds EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION OF AMERICA
  • Who funds TULSA LEGACY CHARTER SCHOOL
  • Who funds Family & Childrens Services Inc

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Tulsa Community FoundationOK36.9× affinity18 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Tulsa Community Foundation · The Hardesty Family Foundation Inc · The Anne and Henry Zarrow Foundation · Sanford P & Irene F Burnstein Foundation Irene F Burnstein Co-Trustee · Ralph and Frances McGill Foundation the Trust Company of Oklahoma · Oneok Foundation Inc · Grace & Franklin Bernsen Foundation · The Gelvin Foundation · George Kaiser Family Foundation · The David E & Cassie L Temple Foundation · Judith and Jean Adams Charitable Foundation · The Charles & Peggy Stephenson Family Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Kathleen S Craft Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 150%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 8%
  • Tulsa Community Foundation11% of income from government
  • Mental Health Association in Tulsa Inc dba Mental Health Association Oklahoma8% of income from government
  • Family & Childrens Services Inc1% of income from government
  • Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of Oklahoma City Inc1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
15get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Kathleen S Craft Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Kathleen S Craft Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 71 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph