· Public charity
Saint Francis Hospital Inc
To extend the presence and healing ministry of christ in all we do.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 46 grants below total $7,387,406 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $8,018,835 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $631,429 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k7 grants · $44k
- $10k–50k26 grants · $443k
- $50k–250k7 grants · $597k
- $250k+6 grants · $6.3M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| RELIGIOUS SISTERS OF MERCY | $2,500,000 |
| OSU FOUNDATION | $1,500,000 |
| TULSA COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION | $1,030,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF TULSA INC | $530,000 |
| CATHOLIC CHARITIES | $450,000 |
| TULSA TOUGH INC | $294,276 |
| AMERICAN KIDNEY FUND | $165,000 |
| ROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF TULSA | $98,000 |
| BISHOP KELLEY HIGH SCHOOL | $86,050 |
| INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO 11 TULSA COUNTY | $84,776 |
| Broken Arrow Public Schools | $62,681 |
| THE PARENT CHILD CENTER OF TULSA | $50,000 |
| TULSA'S FUTURE INC | $50,000 |
| MENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION OF TULSA | $30,000 |
| FAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICES INC | $30,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $1.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
51 repeat relationships — 34 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 62% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.8M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- OSOklahoma State University Foundation7× · 2017–2025 · $5.6M · revenue +46%
- TTTulsa ToughInc8× · 2017–2025 · $1.8M · revenue +358% · 83% of their budget
- AKAMERICAN KIDNEY FUND INC9× · 2017–2025 · $1.2M · revenue +9%
Funded once
- GCGREEN COUNTRY TECHNOLOGYone grant, 2023 · $154k
- MHMARGARET HUDSON PROGRAM INCone grant, 2017 · $100k
- OHOklahoma Hospital Association Incone grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue +7%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The State Chamber is a statewide membership organization. Our purpose is to be the unified voice of business and the most effective advocacy organization at the State Capitol.
Osma's vision is to be the leading voice in health care for oklahoma's patients, families and physicians. osma's mission is better health for oklahoma.
To be the advocate for both physician and patient, to support quality health care, to be a leader in health care reform, and to sustain a continuing dialogue between the membership and the community in which we live and work.
The mission of the Foundation for a Healthy Oklahoma is exclusively for charitable, educational, and scientific purposes. The activities of the Corporation may include: (A) Promoting the good health and welfare (continued on Schedule O)
The oklahoma hall of fame preserves oklahomas unique history while promoting pride in our great state through each of its programs and the gaylord-pickens museum. the association honors our states rich tradition by telling oklahomas story…
Goodwill empowers people to reach their full potential through work opportunities, training, and support services.
To promote the flourishing of the people of oklahoma by advancing principles and policies that support free enterprise, limited government, personal responsibility, and individual initiative.
To improve the lives of children and youth in oklahoma's child welfare system by providing resources and building community.
To empower the american indian through exceptional healthcare.
The State Chamber Research Foundation strives to support Oklahoma's growth and increase prosperity for all Oklahomans. We create solution orientated programming, advance research and policy, and provide sound data geared to advancing…
The mission of the foundation is to develop, create, and maintain programs in the tulsa area designed for health promotion, health education, and disease prevention and treatment through the professional expertise and engagement of the…
To extend the presence and healing ministry of christ in all we do.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mental Health Association in Tulsa Inc dba Mental Health Association Oklahoma and the most unlike its peers is Gospel Rescue Mission Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
72 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 72 of the 96 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Oklahoma State University Foundation ↗
- Who funds MERCY HEALTH OKLAHOMA COMMUNITIES ↗
- Who funds Tulsa ToughInc ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN KIDNEY FUND INC ↗
- Who funds Tulsa Community College Foundation ↗
- Who funds ROTARY DISTRICT 6110 MEDICAL SUPPLIES NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR TULSAS FUTURE ↗
- Who funds The University of Tulsa ↗
- Who funds TULSA AREA UNITED WAY ↗
- Who funds Mental Health Association in Tulsa Inc dba Mental Health Association Oklahoma ↗
- Who funds Connors Development Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds TULSA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION AT SAINT FRANCIS ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds TULSA REGIONAL CHAMBER (FKA METROPOLITAN TULSA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE) ↗
- Who funds Family & Childrens Services Inc ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds MARGARET HUDSON PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds Oklahoma Hospital Association Inc ↗
- Who funds TULSA DAY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Osteopathic Founders Foundation ↗
- Who funds Child Abuse Network Inc dba Child Advocacy Network ↗
- Who funds Ronald McDonald House Charities of Tulsa ↗
- Who funds HIV Resource Consortium Inc dba Tulsa CARES ↗
- Who funds BROKEN ARROW PUBLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATION I ↗
- Who funds LIFE SENIOR SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds THE PARENT CHILD CTR OF TULSA INC ↗
- Who funds The Foundation for Tulsa Schools ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF EASTERN OKLAHOMA INC ↗
- Who funds Emergency Infant Services Inc ↗
- Who funds Tulsa SPCA ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Anne and Henry Zarrow Foundation · Tulsa Community Foundation · The Hardesty Family Foundation Inc · The Sharna and Irvin Frank Foundation · One Gas Foundation Inc · St John Health System Inc · Mervin Bovaird Foundation · The Gelvin Foundation · George Kaiser Family Foundation · Ralph and Frances McGill Foundation the Trust Company of Oklahoma · Arvest Foundation · Grace & Franklin Bernsen Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Saint Francis Hospital Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Newview Oklahoma Inc — 45% of income from government
- Rogers State University Foundation — 20% of income from government
- Tulsa Community Foundation — 11% of income from government
- Tulsa Day Center Inc — 9% of income from government
- Mental Health Association in Tulsa Inc dba Mental Health Association Oklahoma — 8% of income from government
- The University of Tulsa — 5% of income from government
- Family & Childrens Services Inc — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.