Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Jess L and Miriam B Stevens Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
44
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$252k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20212025.

Human Services$2.8MEducation$1.5MHealth$150kFood & Nutrition$145kYouth Development$142kCrime & Legal$128kCommunity Improvement$71kReligion$50kOther$0
02FY2025 · 44 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k19 grants · $99k
  • $10k–50k19 grants · $283k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $425k
  • $250k+1 grant · $252k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$6.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SALVATION ARMY$252,210
UNIVERSITY OF TULSA$100,000
MARRIAGE AND FAMILY INITIATIVE$100,000
EAGLE FAMILY MINISTRIES$100,000
WOVENLIFE$75,000
MCCALL'S CHAPEL SCHOOL$50,000
THE PARENT CHILD CENTER OF TULSA$33,800
HARVEST HOUSE$25,000
ORAL ROBERTS UNIVERSITY$25,000
TULSA LAWYERS FOR CHILDREN$20,000
LIFE SENIOR SERVICES INC$15,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES$15,000
NEIGHBOR FOR NEIGHBOR$15,000
CAMP LOUGHRIDGE$15,000
STREET SCHOOL INC$15,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $1.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 59% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%WOVENLIFE: $75k → 16%EAGLE FAMILY MINISTRIES: $100k → 8%COVENANT HOUSE MISSOURI: $10k → 21%WOVENLIFE: $75k → 16%EAGLE FAMILY MINISTRIES: $100k → 8%COVENANT HOUSE MISSOURI: $10k → 21%WOVENLIFE: $75k → 16%EAGLE FAMILY MINISTRIES: $100k → 8%COVENANT HOUSE MISSOURI: $10k → 21%WOVENLIFE: $75k → 16%EAGLE FAMILY MINISTRIES: $100k → 8%COVENANT HOUSE MISSOURI: $10k → 21%WOVENLIFE: $75k → 16%EAGLE FAMILY MINISTRIES: $100k → 8%COVENANT HOUSE MISSOURI: $10k → 21%CLAREHOUSE: $10k → 15%CLAREHOUSE: $10k → 15%CLAREHOUSE: $10k → 15%CLAREHOUSE: $9k → 15%CLAREHOUSE: $9k → 15%CROSSTOWN LEARNING CENTER INC: $3k → 15%CROSSTOWN LEARNING CENTER INC: $3k → 15%CROSSTOWN LEARNING CENTER INC: $3k → 15%NEIGHBOR FOR NEIGHBOR: $15k → 15%NEIGHBOR FOR NEIGHBOR: $15k → 15%NEIGHBOR FOR NEIGHBOR: $15k → 15%NEIGHBOR FOR NEIGHBOR: $15k → 15%NEIGHBOR FOR NEIGHBOR: $15k → 15%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF TULSA: $20k → 15%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF TULSA: $20k → 15%LIFE SENIOR SERVICES INC: $15k → 15%LIFE SENIOR SERVICES INC: $15k → 15%LIFE SENIOR SERVICES INC: $15k → 15%LIFE SENIOR SERVICES INC: $15k → 15%LIFE SENIOR SERVICES INC: $12k → 15%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF TULSA: $10k → 15%GOLIFE MOBILE MEDICAL INC: $8k → 15%GOLIFE MOBILE MEDICAL INC: $8k → 15%GOLIFE MOBILE MEDICAL INC: $5k → 15%GOLIFE MOBILE MEDICAL INC: $5k → 15%GOLIFE MOBILE MEDICAL INC: $5k → 15%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF TULSA: $3k → 15%YOUTH SERVICES OF TULSA: $5k → 15%YOUTH SERVICES OF TULSA: $5k → 15%YOUTH SERVICES OF TULSA: $5k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$5.0M · 47 repeat orgs$30k to everyone else

47 repeat relationships — 43 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

47
1

Total granted

$5.0M
$5k

Still filing today

70%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentCrime & LegalCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • The University of Tulsa
    5× · 2021–2025 · $500k · revenue +6%
  • MA
    Marriage and Family Initiative Inc
    5× · 2021–2025 · $500k · revenue +50% · 83% of their budget
  • MC
    McCalls Chapel School Inc
    5× · 2021–2025 · $250k · revenue +11%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Community Action Project of Tulsa County Inc

Community action project of tulsa county inc.'s (cap tulsa) mission is to help young children in lower-income families grow up and achieve economic success.

Human Services
2
Tulsa Casa Inc

Tulsa casa is organized to speak for the best interests of abused and neglected children in court. we promote and support volunteer representation for the children in an effort to provide each child a safe, permanent, nurturing home.

Civil Rights
3
Family Safety Center Inc

The family safety center exists to promote safety and justice in tulsa county through co-located multi-disciplinary services that offer protection, hope and healing to victims of intimate partner and family violence, sexual assault,…

Crime & Legal
4
The City Lights Foundation of Oklahoma

Our mission is rooted in the belief that meaningful relationships restore communities. through relational service and dignified housing solutions, we work to help people move from surviving to thriving.

Human Services
5
Tulsa Neighborhood Networks Inc

Provide the poor of the city of tulsa, oklahoma an opportunity to improve their quality of life through guidance and training in the areas of education, employment, family skills, healthcare, housing, socialization and spirituality.

Community Improvement
6
111 Tulsa Inc

111Tulsa exists to mobilize the local church to see that no child is without a family in Tulsa County.

7
McCalls Community Homes Inc

Mccall's mission is to enable individuals with developmental disabilities to be productive members of society; to be good neighbors in the community; to make independent, responsible choices; and to live dignified, happy, and self…

Housing & Shelter
8
Tulsa Day Center Inc

To serve those who are experiencing or at risk for homelessness.

Housing & Shelter
9
City Rescue Mission Inc

Our mission is to lead our community by serving people experiencing or at risk of homelessness with help, hope, and healing, in the spirit of excellence, under the call of christ.

Human Services
10
Family Hope House Inc

Family Hope House empowers families through therapy, education, and advocacy. As Oklahoma's sole adoption competent mental health agency, we support foster and adoptive children for lasting stability and success.

Health
11
Tulsa Volunteers of America Senior Housing Inc

Provides housing to elderly persons under section 202 of the national housing act under agreement with the department of hud.

12
Oklahoma Indian Legal Services Inc

Oklahoma indian legal services is dedicated to representation where federal indian, tribal and treaty law arise. oils is a nonprofit corporation primarily funded by the legal services corporation (lsc). establisehd in 1981, its purpose is…

Crime & Legal

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hospice of Green Country Inc and the most unlike its peers is Marriage and Family Initiative Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 45 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%3%<5yr14%3%5–10yr20%6%10–20yr16%29%20–35yr14%29%35–55yr14%29%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%2%<5yr14%11%5–10yr20%3%10–20yr16%42%20–35yr14%12%35–55yr14%30%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 3% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
3%1/37
the rest of the field
15%
1,200/8,232

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
34/35
Grantees still filing
23/35
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SALVATION ARMY — $1,150,810 · OtherSALVATION ARMYTHE PARENT CHILD CTR OF TULSA INC — $169,300 · OtherTHE PARENT CHILD CTR OF TULSA INCCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF OKLAHOMA CITY INC — $75,000 · Other+21 more — $661,500 · Other+21 moreThe University of Tulsa — $500,000 · EducationThe University of TulsaMarriage and Family Initiative Inc — $500,000 · EducationMarriage and Family Initiative…McCalls Chapel School Inc — $250,000 · EducationMcCalls Chapel School IncSTREET SCHOOL INC — $75,000 · EducationSTREET SCHOOL INC+3 more — $62,500 · EducationEAGLE FAMILY MINISTRIES INC — $500,000 · Human ServicesEAGLE FAMILY MINISTRIES INCWOVENLIFE INC — $375,000 · Human ServicesWOVENLIFE INCNEIGHBOR FOR NEIGHBOR INC — $75,000 · Human ServicesNEIGHBOR FOR NEIGHBOR INCLIFE SENIOR SERVICES INC — $72,000 · Human ServicesLIFE SENIOR SERVICES INCASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF TULSA INC — $52,500 · Human ServicesTULSA BOYS' HOME INC — $50,000 · Human ServicesCOVENANT HOUSE MISSOURI — $50,000 · Human ServicesClarehouse Inc — $48,536 · Human Services+3 more — $53,000 · Human ServicesHARVEST HOUSE OUTREACH INC — $123,000 · Food & NutritionMeals on Wheels of Metro Tulsa Inc — $22,000 · Food & NutritionCAMP LOUGHRIDGE — $75,000 · Youth DevelopmentGIRL SCOUTS OF EASTERN OKLAHOMA INC — $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentTulsa Lawyers for Children Inc — $80,000 · Civil RightsLEGAL AID SERVICES OF OKLAHOMA INC — $25,000 · Crime & LegalTULSA ADVOCATES FOR THE PROTECTION OF CHILDREN — $22,500 · Crime & Legal
Other$2,056,610Education$1,387,500Human Services$1,276,036Food & Nutrition$145,000Youth Development$85,000Civil Rights$80,000Crime & Legal$47,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetThe University of Tulsa — $500,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMarriage and Family Initiative Inc — $500,000 over 5y, 83% of budgetEAGLE FAMILY MINISTRIES INC — $500,000 over 5y, 44% of budgetWOVENLIFE INC — $375,000 over 5y, 4.5% of budgetMcCalls Chapel School Inc — $250,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetTHE PARENT CHILD CTR OF TULSA INC — $169,300 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetHARVEST HOUSE OUTREACH INC — $123,000 over 5y, 8.7% of budgetTulsa Lawyers for Children Inc — $80,000 over 4y, 5.4% of budgetSTREET SCHOOL INC — $75,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF OKLAHOMA CITY INC — $75,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetCAMP LOUGHRIDGE — $75,000 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetNEIGHBOR FOR NEIGHBOR INC — $75,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetLIFE SENIOR SERVICES INC — $72,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetHOSPICE OF GREEN COUNTRY INC — $60,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF TULSA INC — $52,500 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetTULSA BOYS' HOME INC — $50,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE MISSOURI — $50,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetClarehouse Inc — $48,536 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetINDIAN NATIONS COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA — $42,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetLITTLE LIGHT HOUSE INC — $39,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetTULSA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC — $37,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetA NEW LEAF INC — $33,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetGO LIFE MOBILE MEDICAL INC — $30,000 over 5y, 2.2% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOUNDATION INC — $25,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLEGAL AID SERVICES OF OKLAHOMA INC — $25,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetOKLAHOMA CENTER FOR NONPROFITS INC — $25,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetORAL ROBERTS UNIVERSITY — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTULSA ADVOCATES FOR THE PROTECTION OF CHILDREN — $22,500 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetMeals on Wheels of Metro Tulsa Inc — $22,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetYOUTH SERVICES OF TULSA INC — $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetThe Foundation for Tulsa Schools — $12,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSpecial Olympics Oklahoma Inc — $10,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF EASTERN OKLAHOMA INC — $10,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION RESOURCES — $9,500 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetCROSSTOWN LEARNING CENTER INC — $8,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The University of Tulsa
  • Who funds Marriage and Family Initiative Inc
  • Who funds EAGLE FAMILY MINISTRIES INC
  • Who funds WOVENLIFE INC
  • Who funds McCalls Chapel School Inc
  • Who funds THE PARENT CHILD CTR OF TULSA INC
  • Who funds HARVEST HOUSE OUTREACH INC
  • Who funds Tulsa Lawyers for Children Inc
  • Who funds STREET SCHOOL INC
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF OKLAHOMA CITY INC
  • Who funds CAMP LOUGHRIDGE
  • Who funds NEIGHBOR FOR NEIGHBOR INC
  • Who funds LIFE SENIOR SERVICES INC
  • Who funds HOSPICE OF GREEN COUNTRY INC
  • Who funds ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF TULSA INC
  • Who funds TULSA BOYS' HOME INC
  • Who funds COVENANT HOUSE MISSOURI
  • Who funds Clarehouse Inc
  • Who funds INDIAN NATIONS COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA
  • Who funds LITTLE LIGHT HOUSE INC
  • Who funds TULSA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC
  • Who funds A NEW LEAF INC
  • Who funds GO LIFE MOBILE MEDICAL INC
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds LEGAL AID SERVICES OF OKLAHOMA INC
  • Who funds OKLAHOMA CENTER FOR NONPROFITS INC
  • Who funds ORAL ROBERTS UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds TULSA ADVOCATES FOR THE PROTECTION OF CHILDREN
  • Who funds Meals on Wheels of Metro Tulsa Inc

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Ralph and Frances McGill Foundation the Trust Company of OklahomaOK47.3× affinity20 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Ralph and Frances McGill Foundation the Trust Company of Oklahoma · The Anne and Henry Zarrow Foundation · Tulsa Community Foundation · The Gelvin Foundation · The Sharna and Irvin Frank Foundation · Sarkeys Foundation · Mervin Bovaird Foundation · Grace & Franklin Bernsen Foundation · One Gas Foundation Inc · Oneok Foundation Inc · George Kaiser Family Foundation · Tulsa Area United Way

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Jess L and Miriam B Stevens Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 160%6%23%51%90%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 5%
  • Legal Aid Services of Oklahoma Inc13% of income from government
  • Youth Services of Tulsa Inc8% of income from government
  • The University of Tulsa5% of income from government
  • Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of Oklahoma City Inc1% of income from government
  • Tulsa Habitat for Humanity Inc0% of income from government
  • Oral Roberts University0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
16get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Jess L and Miriam B Stevens Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Jess L and Miriam B Stevens Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 49 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph