Skip to content

· Private foundation

Voskuhl-Staab Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$636k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$103k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$1.4MEducation$682kInternational$575kHuman Services$396kRecreation & Sports$102kHousing & Shelter$58kHealth$50kFood & Nutrition$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $118k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $494k
$26,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$5.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
STS PETER & PAUL SCHOOL$102,500
AUGUSTINE INSTITUTE$100,000
CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF TULSA$76,000
CLOEPATRA FOUNDATION INC$60,000
ST GREGORY'S ABBEY$55,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES$50,000
CITY LIGHTS FOUNDATION$50,000
CASCIA HALL PREPARATORY SCHOOL$30,000
OSU FOUNDATION$26,000
NEWMAN CENTER UNIVERSITY OF TULSA$21,500
POKES WITH A PURPOSE$20,000
ST FRANCIS OF ASSISI TUITION ASSIST$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Individual grant recipient$7,000
BASKET OF DREAMS FOUNDATION$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $107k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Tulsa Boys Home: $1k → 15%CITY LIGHTS FOUNDATION: $50k → 15%TULSA BOYS' HOME: $1k → 15%GO LIFE MOBILE MEDICAL INC: $10k → 15%GO LIFE MOBILE MEDICAL INC: $10k → 15%Go Life Mobile Medical Inc: $8k → 15%GO LIFE MOBILE MEDICAL INC: $8k → 15%GO LIFE MOBILE MEDICAL INC: $8k → 15%Go Life Mobile Medical Inc: $8k → 15%STAND IN THE GAP: $2k → 15%Life Senior Services: $2k → 15%STAND IN THE GAP: $1k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
MN
IL
WI
NY
CA
CO
MD
DC
OK
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.8M · 37 repeat orgs$524k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +46% since the first grant, against +15% for those funded once.

37 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 25 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

37
45

Total granted

$2.8M
$431k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
+15%

Still filing today

24%
22%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $93k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesInternationalPhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OS
    Oklahoma State University Foundation
    8× · 2017–2025 · $349k · revenue +46%
  • CC
    CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF OKLAHOMA CITY INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $328k · revenue +48%
  • Augustine Institute Inc
    8× · 2017–2025 · $265k · revenue +321%

Funded once

  • SG
    ST GREGORY'S UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2017 · $113k · revenue -93%
  • PO
    PARISH OF CHRIST THE KING
    one grant, 2024 · $60k
  • SP
    St Pius X Parish
    one grant, 2017 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Tulsa Honor Academy Inc

The operation of a public charter school in the tulsa area with the mission to equip all scholars with the academic skills, content knowledge, and ethical character required for college graduation and life success.

Education
2
Tulsa Legacy Charter School

To prepare students for college through a rigorous arts infused program.

Education
3
Tulsa Volunteers of America Senior Housing Inc

Provides housing to elderly persons under section 202 of the national housing act under agreement with the department of hud.

—
4
Tulsa Neighborhood Networks Inc

Provide the poor of the city of tulsa, oklahoma an opportunity to improve their quality of life through guidance and training in the areas of education, employment, family skills, healthcare, housing, socialization and spirituality.

Community Improvement
5
Goodwill Industries of Tulsa Inc

Goodwill empowers people to reach their full potential through work opportunities, training, and support services.

Employment
6
Tulsa Area United Way

The tulsa area united way unites people and resources to improve lives and strengthen our communities.

—
7
Oklahoma Educational Memorial Trust Fdn

Providing, maintaining and issuing scholarships to eligible nominees or applicants for admission to college or for contributions to regularly maintained scholarship funds of other federal tax exempt colleges and universities with an…

Education
8
Tulsa Advocates for the Protection of Children

To improve the lives of children and youth in oklahoma's child welfare system by providing resources and building community.

Crime & Legal
9
Tulsa County Medical Society Foundation

The mission of the foundation is to develop, create, and maintain programs in the tulsa area designed for health promotion, health education, and disease prevention and treatment through the professional expertise and engagement of the…

Philanthropy
10
The Tulsa Foundation for Health Care Ser

The tulsa foundation for health care services, inc. was established to fund and operate the bedlam clinic.

Health
11
Tulsa County Medical Society Inc

To be the advocate for both physician and patient, to support quality health care, to be a leader in health care reform, and to sustain a continuing dialogue between the membership and the community in which we live and work.

—
12
Life International

To partner with leaders globally to boldly proclaim the biblical truth of the father's heart for life, champion the gospel of jesus christ, and establish life-giving ministries.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Oklahoma State University Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Pokes With a Purpose Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 89 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/24
Grantees still filing
17/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF TULSA: $476,500 · OtherCATHOLIC DIOCESE OF TULSACATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF OKLAHOMA CITY INC: $328,250 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF OKLAHOMA CITY INCSAN MIGUEL SCHOOL: $215,000 · OtherSAN MIGUEL SCHOOLSTS PETER & PAUL SCHOOL: $167,500 · OtherSTS PETER & PAUL SCHOOLST GREGORY'S UNIVERSITY: $112,500 · OtherST GREGORYS ABBEY: $95,000 · Other+66 more: $1,125,300 · Other+66 moreOklahoma State University Foundation: $348,500 · EducationOklahoma State Univer…Augustine Institute Inc: $265,000 · EducationAugustine Institute I…+4 more: $21,000 · EducationGO LIFE MOBILE MEDICAL INC: $50,000 · Human ServicesTHE CITY LIGHTS FOUNDATION OF OKLAHOMA: $50,000 · Human Services+3 more: $6,500 · Human ServicesPokes With A Purpose Inc: $20,000 · Recreation & SportsKONTUM MISSIONARY AND FRIENDSHIP: $7,000 · InternationalWATTS OF LOVE: $2,500 · InternationalCOMMUNITY ACTION RESOURCES: $8,000 · Community ImprovementMercy Ships Foundation: $5,000 · PhilanthropyFRIENDS OF SAN LUCAS: $2,500 · Philanthropy
Other$2,520,050Education$634,500Human Services$106,500Recreation & Sports$20,000International$9,500Community Improvement$8,000Philanthropy$7,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOklahoma State University Foundation: $348,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF OKLAHOMA CITY INC: $328,250 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetAugustine Institute Inc: $265,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetST GREGORY'S UNIVERSITY: $112,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetGO LIFE MOBILE MEDICAL INC: $50,000 over 6y, 5.0% of budgetTHE CITY LIGHTS FOUNDATION OF OKLAHOMA: $50,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetDREXEL ACADEMY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION RESOURCES: $8,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetKONTUM MISSIONARY AND FRIENDSHIP: $7,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetMercy Ships Foundation: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTULSA DAY CENTER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetIN HIS IMAGE INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetINDIAN NATIONS COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $3,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTAND IN THE GAP INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetRonald McDonald House Charities of Tulsa: $3,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFRIENDS OF SAN LUCAS: $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWATTS OF LOVE: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTulsa Foundation for Architecture: $2,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTULSA BOYS' HOME INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLIFE SENIOR SERVICES INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Oklahoma State University Foundation ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF OKLAHOMA CITY INC ↗
  • Who funds Augustine Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds ST GREGORY'S UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds GO LIFE MOBILE MEDICAL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CITY LIGHTS FOUNDATION OF OKLAHOMA ↗
  • Who funds Pokes With A Purpose Inc ↗
  • Who funds DREXEL ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION RESOURCES ↗
  • Who funds KONTUM MISSIONARY AND FRIENDSHIP ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Tulsa Community FoundationOK32.9× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Tulsa Community Foundation · Saint Francis Hospital Inc · Kathleen S Craft Foundation · Ralph and Frances McGill Foundation the Trust Company of Oklahoma · The Hardesty Family Foundation Inc · George Kaiser Family Foundation · Moran Family Foundation · Jess L and Miriam B Stevens Foundation · Grace & Franklin Bernsen Foundation · Mervin Bovaird Foundation · Oneok Foundation Inc · El and Thelma Gaylord Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Voskuhl-Staab Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Voskuhl-Staab Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 120%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 9%
  • Tulsa Day Center Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of Oklahoma City Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
12get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Voskuhl-Staab Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Voskuhl-Staab Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 89 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Voskuhl-Staab’s filings →

More from the funding graph