Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Volckmann Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$11k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Employment$130kFood & Nutrition$54kYouth Development$40kReligion$25kHuman Services$25kInternational$12kHousing & Shelter$9kHealth$9kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$2,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$776
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Embarcadero Media Foundation$5,000
Live In Peace Inc$2,500
Journey Home Foundation$2,000
Menlo Church$1,000
The Art of Yoga Project$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $14k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 11% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%The Art of Yoga Project: $500 → 8%The Art of Yoga Project: $500 → 12%Safe Home: $3k → 5%The Art of Yoga Project: $500 → 12%Safe Home: $3k → 5%Safe Home: $3k → 5%Safe Home: $3k → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$290k · 15 repeat orgs$25k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +35% since the first grant, against +8% for the ones you funded once.

15 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
10

Total granted

$290k
$25k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+8%

Still filing today

53%
70%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Food & NutritionYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesEducationEmploymentReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JI
    JOBTRAIN INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $130k · revenue +35%
  • EH
    ECUMENICAL HUNGER PROGRAM
    4× · 2020–2023 · $25k · revenue +1%
  • SI
    SAFEHOME INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $12k · revenue +34%

Funded once

  • L
    LIFEMOVES
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +7%
  • SH
    SECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +8%
  • TA
    The Almanac Holiday Fund
    one grant, 2022 · $3k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
San Francisco Food Bank

To end hunger in san francisco and marin counties by soliciting food donations nationally, distributing this food to qualifying public service agencies and neighborhood pantries, advocating for improved government food programs, and…

2
Sutter Bay Hospitals

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
3
Samaritan House

Fighting poverty. lifting lives. we mobilize the resources of our community to help those among us who are in need. our dedicated professional staff and volunteers work together to provide food, access to shelter, healthcare, and a broad…

4
Enterprise for Youth

Enterprise for youth empowers under-resourced san francisco youths to reach their potential through transformative paid internship experiences supported by a community of employers, caring adults, and peers.

Youth Development
5
Silicon Valley Education Foundation

Who we are - silicon valley education foundation (svef) focuses on raising student performance in the critical areas of math and science across all 33 santa clara county school districts, and also adjoining san mateo and alameda counties.…

Community Improvement
6
Sutter Bay Medical Foundation

Mission statement: mission: caring for our patients first and our people always. vision: to be the most comprehensive, integrated and connected health system for getting and staying well. values: excellence - we deliver high-quality,…

Health
7
The San Francisco Particular Council of the Society of St Vincent De Paul

The mission of the st. vincent de paul society of san francisco (svdp-sf) is to offer hope and service on a direct person-to-person basis, working to break the cycles of homelessness and domestic violence.

Human Services
8
Homeward Bound of Marin

Homeward Bound is the main provider of emergency shelter, supportive housing and services for people overcoming a crisis of homelessness in Marin County, California. Our mission of "opening doors to safety, dignity, hope, and…

Housing & Shelter
9
San Francisco Challenge dba AmericaOne
Recreation & Sports
10
Habitat for Humanity Greater San Francisco

Habitat for humanity greater san francisco builds and sustains affordable homeownership opportunities for families in marin, san francisco and san mateo counties.

11
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
12
Extrafood

Food Rescue - The Organization rescues excess fresh food from Bay Area businesses, schools and non-profits and immediately delivers the food to safety net partners - such as senior housing centers, after-school programs, and homeless…

Food & Nutrition

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lifemoves and the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
12/16
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

JOBTRAIN INC — $130,000 · EmploymentJOBTRAIN INCSecond Harvest Food Bank — $23,000 · OtherSecond Harvest Food BankNEW COMMUNITY CHURCH — $20,000 · OtherNEW COMMUNITY CHURCHBoys and Girls Club — $9,000 · OtherBoys and Girls ClubRonald McDonald House — $7,000 · OtherRonald McDonald HouseALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION — $6,000 · OtherALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATIONLIFEMOVES — $5,000 · OtherMenlo Church — $5,000 · OtherJOURNEY HOME FOUNDATION — $4,000 · OtherCALIFORNIA FAMILY FOUNDATION — $4,000 · Other+7 more — $14,000 · Other+7 moreECUMENICAL HUNGER PROGRAM — $25,000 · Food & NutritionECUMENICAL …SECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY — $5,000 · Food & NutritionSECOND HARV…+1 more — $1,000 · Food & NutritionLIVE IN PEACE — $27,500 · Youth DevelopmentLIVE IN PE…BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PENINSULA — $3,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIR…SAFEHOME INC — $12,000 · Human ServicesTHE ART OF YOGA PROJECT — $1,500 · Human ServicesEMBARCADERO MEDIA FOUNDATION — $8,000 · Arts & CultureSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $8,000 · Religion
Employment$130,000Other$97,000Food & Nutrition$31,000Youth Development$30,500Human Services$13,500Arts & Culture$8,000Religion$8,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJOBTRAIN INC — $130,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetLIVE IN PEACE — $27,500 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetECUMENICAL HUNGER PROGRAM — $25,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSAFEHOME INC — $12,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetEMBARCADERO MEDIA FOUNDATION — $8,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLIFEMOVES — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA FAMILY FOUNDATION — $4,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PENINSULA — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSilicon Valley Community Foundation — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBridgton Academy — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ART OF YOGA PROJECT — $1,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES - BAY AREA — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JOBTRAIN INC
  • Who funds LIVE IN PEACE
  • Who funds ECUMENICAL HUNGER PROGRAM
  • Who funds SAFEHOME INC
  • Who funds EMBARCADERO MEDIA FOUNDATION
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE
  • Who funds LIFEMOVES
  • Who funds SECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA FAMILY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PENINSULA
  • Who funds Silicon Valley Community Foundation
  • Who funds Bridgton Academy
  • Who funds THE ART OF YOGA PROJECT
  • Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES - BAY AREA
  • Who funds ST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE
  • Who funds PATHWAYS HOME HEALTH AND HOSPICE

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Silicon Valley Community FoundationCA20× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Los Altos Mountain View Community Foundation · Tosa Foundation · The Palo Alto Community Fund · San Jose Mercury News Wish Book Fund Inc · Atkinson Foundation · Philanthropic Ventures Foundation · The William & Flora Hewlett Foundation · Bright Funds Foundation · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Volckmann Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph