Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Vogel Charitable Foundation Uad 12261990

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$30k
Granted FY2024still arriving
25
Grants FY2024still arriving
11
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What you fund
0189% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192024.

Religion$52kEducation$19kHuman Services$19kHealth$18kAnimals$13kEnvironment$8kArts & Culture$4kCommunity Improvement$3kOther$0
02FY2024 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$653k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PALMETTO PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$6,750
BOTANIC GARDEN AT HISTORIC BARNS PARK$3,000
FRIENDS OF THE TRAVERSE AREA DISTRICT$3,000
YMCA - GREATER SAN ANTONIO$2,000
SIMPSON COLLEGE$1,300
HEAR FOUNDATION$1,300
NAMASTE ENRICHMENT CENTER INC$1,250
Individual grant recipient$1,250
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$1,250
LASER (LARGE ANIMAL SHELTERS & EMERGENCY$1,000
YAVAPHI HUMANE SOCIETY$1,000
JUSTIN COWBOY CRISIS FUND$1,000
HORSES WITH HEART INC$1,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF ARIZONA$1,000
SALVATION ARMY OF TEXAS$800
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 20% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%JUSTIN COWBOY CRISIS FUND: $1k → 9%EAST COOPER COMMUNITY OUTREACH: $250 → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
MI
NY
IA
CO
AZ
NC
SC
DC
OK
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$113k · 22 repeat orgs$39k to everyone else

22 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 17 since wound down; 20 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
31

Total granted

$113k
$14k

Still filing today

0%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 20% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $24k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesAnimalsInternationalHealthReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PP
    PALMETTO PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH
    4× · 2019–2023 · $31k
  • NI
    NAMASTE INC
    4× · 2019–2023 · $15k
  • PP
    PLANNED PARENTHOOD
    4× · 2019–2023 · $11k

Funded once

  • IB
    IDAHO BLACK BEAR REHAB
    one grant, 2019 · $2k
  • SW
    SHELDRICK WILDLIFE TRUST USA
    one grant, 2019 · $1k
  • YH
    YAVAPAI HUMANE SOCIETY
    one grant, 2021 · $790

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Humane Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

The primary mission of the humane society is to end animal cruelty, neglect and overpopulation in south carolina.

Animals
2
Animal Care Sanctuary

Animal care sanctuary's lifesaving mission as a no kill organization envisions a community that promotes turning compassion into action for companion animals by: 1.) adopting healthy pet companions into loving homes. 2.) promoting the…

Animals
3
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
4
The Humane Society for Seattleking County

Seattle humane promotes the human-animal bond by saving and serving pets in need, regardless of age, ability, circumstance or geography.

Animals
5
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
6
International Federation of Accountants

Ifac acts in the public interest and has no profit-making purpose. ifac serves the public interest by: speaking out and engaging as the voice for the global profession; leading and developing a future-ready accountancy profession; and…

Education
7
Columbia College

Columbia college improves lives by providing quality education to both traditional and nontraditional students, helping them achieve their true potential.

Education
8
Marin Humane Society

Marin humane transforms lives through exceptional animal care, humane education, and advocacy. every day, marin humane inspires compassion and positive relationships between people and animals.

Animals
9
University of the Sciences in Philadelphia

University of the sciences prepares students to become leaders, innovators, and skilled practitioners in the sciences, the health professions, and related disciplines. we deliver excellence in teaching, research, and service through a safe…

10
American Water Works Association

To promote public health, safety, and welfare through the improvement of the quality and quantity of drinking water and the development and furtherance of understanding of the problems relating thereto.

Public Benefit
11
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
12
Washington Humane Society

The washington humane society protects animals, supports families, and advocates for positive change to create a world where all animals can thrive. we enrich the humanity of our communities by promoting compassion and encouraging people…

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Medecins Sans Frontieres Usa Inc and the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 73 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
3/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

PALMETTO PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH — $30,705 · OtherPALMETTO PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHNAMASTE INC — $14,696 · OtherNAMASTE INCPLANNED PARENTHOOD — $10,928 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOODFRIENDS OF THE TRAVERSE AREA DISTRICT LIBRARY — $9,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF THE TRAVERSE AREA DISTRICT LIBRARYYMCA OF GREATER SAN ANTONIO — $8,500 · OtherYMCA OF GREATER SAN ANTONIOBOTANIC GARDEN AT HISTORIC BARNS PARK — $7,100 · OtherPALMETTO PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH — $6,750 · OtherSIMPSON COLLEGE — $6,300 · Other+54 more — $50,586 · Other+54 moreSimpson College — $1,300 · EducationROCKFORD UNIVERSITY — $250 · EducationYAVAPAI HUMANE SOCIETY — $1,000 · AnimalsHUMANE SOCIETY OF SAN ANTONIO (AUDIT) — $500 · AnimalsJustin Cowboy Crisis Fund Inc — $1,000 · Human ServicesEast Cooper Community Outreach — $250 · Human ServicesWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $600 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $500 · InternationalHORSES WITH HEART INC — $1,000 · HealthSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $250 · ReligionINTERLOCHEN CENTER FOR THE ARTS — $125 · Arts & Culture
Other$144,565Education$1,550Animals$1,500Human Services$1,250International$1,100Health$1,000Religion$250Arts & Culture$125

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSimpson College — $1,300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJustin Cowboy Crisis Fund Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHORSES WITH HEART INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetYAVAPAI HUMANE SOCIETY — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF SAN ANTONIO (AUDIT) — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEast Cooper Community Outreach — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROCKFORD UNIVERSITY — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTERLOCHEN CENTER FOR THE ARTS — $125 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Simpson College
  • Who funds Justin Cowboy Crisis Fund Inc
  • Who funds HORSES WITH HEART INC
  • Who funds YAVAPAI HUMANE SOCIETY

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Edward Jones FoundationMO12.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Edward Jones Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Vogel Charitable Foundation Uad 12261990 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 73 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph