Skip to content

· Private foundation

Vogel Charitable Foundation Uad 12261990

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$30k
Granted FY2024still arriving
25
Grants FY2024still arriving
11
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Religion$52kEducation$19kHuman Services$19kHealth$18kAnimals$13kEnvironment$8kArts & Culture$4kCommunity Improvement$3kOther$0
02FY2024 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$653k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PALMETTO PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$6,750
FRIENDS OF THE TRAVERSE AREA DISTRICT$3,000
BOTANIC GARDEN AT HISTORIC BARNS PARK$3,000
YMCA - GREATER SAN ANTONIO$2,000
SIMPSON COLLEGE$1,300
HEAR FOUNDATION$1,300
Individual grant recipient$1,250
NAMASTE ENRICHMENT CENTER INC$1,250
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$1,250
YAVAPHI HUMANE SOCIETY$1,000
HORSES WITH HEART INC$1,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF ARIZONA$1,000
LASER (LARGE ANIMAL SHELTERS & EMERGENCY$1,000
JUSTIN COWBOY CRISIS FUND$1,000
SALVATION ARMY OF TEXAS$800
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 20% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%JUSTIN COWBOY CRISIS FUND: $1k → 9%EAST COOPER COMMUNITY OUTREACH: $250 → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
IA
CO
AZ
NC
SC
DC
OK
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$113k · 21 repeat orgs$39k to everyone else

21 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 16 since wound down; 20 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
31

Total granted

$113k
$14k

Still filing today

0%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 20% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $24k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesAnimalsInternationalHealthReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PP
    PALMETTO PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH
    4× · 2019–2023 · $31k
  • NI
    NAMASTE INC
    4× · 2019–2023 · $15k
  • PP
    PLANNED PARENTHOOD
    4× · 2019–2023 · $11k

Funded once

  • IB
    IDAHO BLACK BEAR REHAB
    one grant, 2019 · $2k
  • SW
    SHELDRICK WILDLIFE TRUST USA
    one grant, 2019 · $1k
  • VI
    VESTER INTEREST IN K9S INC
    one grant, 2021 · $790
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Humane Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

The primary mission of the humane society is to end animal cruelty, neglect and overpopulation in south carolina.

Animals
2
Animal Care Sanctuary

Animal care sanctuary's lifesaving mission as a no kill organization envisions a community that promotes turning compassion into action for companion animals by: 1.) adopting healthy pet companions into loving homes. 2.) promoting the…

Animals
3
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
4
The Humane Society for Seattleking County

Seattle humane promotes the human-animal bond by saving and serving pets in need, regardless of age, ability, circumstance or geography.

Animals
5
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
6
International Federation of Accountants

Ifac acts in the public interest and has no profit-making purpose. ifac serves the public interest by: speaking out and engaging as the voice for the global profession; leading and developing a future-ready accountancy profession; and…

Education
7
Columbia College

Columbia college improves lives by providing quality education to both traditional and nontraditional students, helping them achieve their true potential.

Education
8
Marin Humane Society

Marin humane transforms lives through exceptional animal care, humane education, and advocacy. every day, marin humane inspires compassion and positive relationships between people and animals.

Animals
9
University of the Sciences in Philadelphia

University of the sciences prepares students to become leaders, innovators, and skilled practitioners in the sciences, the health professions, and related disciplines. we deliver excellence in teaching, research, and service through a safe…

—
10
American Water Works Association

To promote public health, safety, and welfare through the improvement of the quality and quantity of drinking water and the development and furtherance of understanding of the problems relating thereto.

Public Benefit
11
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
12
Washington Humane Society

The washington humane society protects animals, supports families, and advocates for positive change to create a world where all animals can thrive. we enrich the humanity of our communities by promoting compassion and encouraging people…

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Medecins Sans Frontieres Usa Inc; the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 72 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
3/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PALMETTO PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $30,705 · OtherPALMETTO PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHNAMASTE INC: $14,696 · OtherNAMASTE INCPLANNED PARENTHOOD: $10,928 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOODFRIENDS OF THE TRAVERSE AREA DISTRICT LIBRARY: $9,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF THE TRAVERSE AREA DISTRICT LIBRARYYMCA OF GREATER SAN ANTONIO: $8,500 · OtherYMCA OF GREATER SAN ANTONIOBOTANIC GARDEN AT HISTORIC BARNS PARK: $7,100 · OtherPALMETTO PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $6,750 · OtherSIMPSON COLLEGE: $6,300 · Other+53 more: $50,586 · Other+53 moreSimpson College: $1,300 · EducationROCKFORD UNIVERSITY: $250 · EducationYAVAPAI HUMANE SOCIETY: $1,000 · AnimalsHUMANE SOCIETY OF SAN ANTONIO (AUDIT): $500 · AnimalsJustin Cowboy Crisis Fund Inc: $1,000 · Human ServicesEast Cooper Community Outreach: $250 · Human ServicesWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $600 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $500 · InternationalHORSES WITH HEART INC: $1,000 · HealthSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $250 · ReligionINTERLOCHEN CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $125 · Arts & Culture
Other$144,565Education$1,550Animals$1,500Human Services$1,250International$1,100Health$1,000Religion$250Arts & Culture$125

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSimpson College: $1,300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHORSES WITH HEART INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetJustin Cowboy Crisis Fund Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYAVAPAI HUMANE SOCIETY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF SAN ANTONIO (AUDIT): $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEast Cooper Community Outreach: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROCKFORD UNIVERSITY: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTERLOCHEN CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $125 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Simpson College ↗
  • Who funds HORSES WITH HEART INC ↗
  • Who funds Justin Cowboy Crisis Fund Inc ↗
  • Who funds YAVAPAI HUMANE SOCIETY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Edward Jones FoundationMO12.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Edward Jones Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Vogel Charitable Foundation Uad 12261990 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Vogel Charitable Foundation Uad 12261990. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 72 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Vogel Charitable Foundation Uad 12261990’s filings →

    More from the funding graph