· Private foundation
Virginia Conlogue Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k2 grants · $11k
- $10k–50k10 grants · $231k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PINK RIBBON GOOD | $50,000 |
| THE FOODBANK CO | $35,000 |
| UNITED REHABILITATION SERVICES | $33,000 |
| AIR FORCE MUSEUM FOUNDATION | $30,000 |
| HOSPICE OF DAYTON FOUNDATION | $30,000 |
| ST MARY'S DEVELOPMENT | $26,000 |
| DAYBREAK | $20,000 |
| LEARNING TREE FARM | $16,000 |
| SICSA | $16,000 |
| HUMANE SOCIETY OF GREATER DAYTON | $15,000 |
| CLOTHES THAT WORK | $10,000 |
| CRAYON'S TO CLASSROOMS | $6,000 |
| ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $69k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +25% since the first grant, against +1% for the ones you funded once.
15 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $89k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PRPINK RIBBON GOOD INC9× · 2017–2025 · $755k · revenue +438%
- OHOHIO'S HOSPICE FOUNDATION9× · 2017–2025 · $277k · revenue +26%
- TFTHE FOODBANK INC7× · 2017–2025 · $200k · revenue +167%
Funded once
- WGWITH GODS GRACEone grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue +1%
- HFHABITAT FOR HUMANITYone grant, 2021 · $20k
- ARAMERICAN RED CROSSone grant, 2017 · $15k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The hospice of dayton, inc. is committed to making quality hospice care available and accessible to terminally ill persons and their families, regardless of ability to pay, and in a manner consistent with the highest hospice standards. our…
See schedule oto create a better world by serving people in need by operating food pantries, homeless shelters, a domestic violence shelter, affordable housing communities, senior living, assisted living and skilled care facilities, a home…
To create a better world by serving people in need by operating food pantries, homeless shelters, a domestic violence shelter, affordable housing communities, senior living, assisted living and skilled care facilities, a home health care…
The mission of the akron-canton regional foodbank is to lead a collaborative network that empowers people to experience healthy and hunger-free lives. we distribute food to feed people and we advocate, engage and convene our community in…
The hospice of miami county, inc. is committed to making quality hospice care available and accessible to terminally ill persons and their families, regardless of ability pay, and in a manner consistent with the highest hospice standards.…
Empowering and strengthening ohio's people (esop) helps adults in all stages of life achieve and maintain financial wellness and housing stability.
Helping individuals live with dignity through the final stage of life.
Working together to ensure everyone in our communities has the nutritious food they need every day.
We empower people on their journey to independence through the sale of donated goods, which supports employment programs and family services.
Transforming the lives of individuals with disabilities and other barriers through pathways to independence and the power of work.
To create a better world by serving people in need by operating food pantries, homeless shelters, a domestic violence shelter, affordable housing communities, senior living, assisted living and skilled care facilities, a home health care…
To improve the health of under-served communities by increasing affordable access to healthy food.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ohio's Hospice Foundation and the most unlike its peers is With Gods Grace. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PINK RIBBON GOOD INC ↗
- Who funds OHIO'S HOSPICE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE FOODBANK INC ↗
- Who funds ST MARY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds THE SEEDLING FOUNDATION OF DAYTON OHIO ↗
- Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF GREATER DAYTON ↗
- Who funds DAYBREAK INC ↗
- Who funds CRAYONS TO CLASSROOMS ↗
- Who funds The Learning Tree Farm Inc ↗
- Who funds UNITED REHABILITATION SERVICES OF GREATER DAYTON ↗
- Who funds THE AIR FORCE MUSEUM FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds WITH GODS GRACE ↗
- Who funds ARTEMIS CENTER FOR ALTERNATIVES TO DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ↗
- Who funds Society for the Improvement of Conditions for Stray Animals ↗
- Who funds DAYTON INTERNATIONAL PEACE MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds WESTCARE OHIO INC ↗
- Who funds LIFE ESSENTIALS INC ↗
- Who funds CLOTHES THAT WORK ↗
- Who funds Healthy Habits Cook Club Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Dayton Foundation · Dayton Foundation Depository · Dayton Foundation Plus Inc · The CareSource Foundation · The United Way of the Greater Dayton Area · Mathile Family Foundation · Synchrony Foundation · Iddings Benevolent Trust Xxxxx5009 · The Berry Family Foundation · Levin Family Foundation · Virginia W Kettering Foundation Xxxxx3003 · Miami Valley Hospital
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Virginia Conlogue Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.