Skip to content
Virginia Conlogue Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Virginia Conlogue Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$292k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$1.5MFood & Nutrition$270kHousing & Shelter$203kEducation$121kHuman Services$83kAnimals$69kCommunity Improvement$45kArts & Culture$45kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $11k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $231k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PINK RIBBON GOOD$50,000
THE FOODBANK CO$35,000
UNITED REHABILITATION SERVICES$33,000
AIR FORCE MUSEUM FOUNDATION$30,000
HOSPICE OF DAYTON FOUNDATION$30,000
ST MARY'S DEVELOPMENT$26,000
DAYBREAK$20,000
LEARNING TREE FARM$16,000
SICSA$16,000
HUMANE SOCIETY OF GREATER DAYTON$15,000
CLOTHES THAT WORK$10,000
CRAYON'S TO CLASSROOMS$6,000
ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $69k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%CLOTHES THAT WORK: $10k → 14%HEALTHY HABITS COOK CLUB: $9k → 14%DAYBREAK: $20k → 14%DAYBREAK: $10k → 14%DAYBREAK: $10k → 14%DAYBREAK: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.2M · 15 repeat orgs$188k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +25% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
6

Total granted

$2.2M
$99k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
0%

Still filing today

67%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $89k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesFood & NutritionEducationAnimalsArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PR
    PINK RIBBON GOOD INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $755k · revenue +438%
  • OH
    OHIO'S HOSPICE FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $277k · revenue +89%
  • TF
    THE FOODBANK INC
    7× · 2017–2025 · $200k · revenue +167%

Funded once

  • WG
    WITH GODS GRACE
    one grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue 0%
  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITY
    one grant, 2021 · $20k
  • WO
    WESTCARE OHIO INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $15k · revenue +277%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hospice of Dayton Inc

The hospice of dayton, inc. is committed to making quality hospice care available and accessible to terminally ill persons and their families, regardless of ability to pay, and in a manner consistent with the highest hospice standards. our…

Human Services
2
Lutheran Social Services of Central Ohio Delaware Housing Inc

See schedule oto create a better world by serving people in need by operating food pantries, homeless shelters, a domestic violence shelter, affordable housing communities, senior living, assisted living and skilled care facilities, a home…

—
3
Faith Mission Inc

To create a better world by serving people in need by operating food pantries, homeless shelters, a domestic violence shelter, affordable housing communities, senior living, assisted living and skilled care facilities, a home health care…

Housing & Shelter
4
Akron-Canton Regional Foodbank

The mission of the akron-canton regional foodbank is to lead a collaborative network that empowers people to experience healthy and hunger-free lives. we distribute food to feed people and we advocate, engage and convene our community in…

Food & Nutrition
5
Hospice of Miami County Inc

The hospice of miami county, inc. is committed to making quality hospice care available and accessible to terminally ill persons and their families, regardless of ability pay, and in a manner consistent with the highest hospice standards.…

—
6
Empowering and Strengthening Ohio's People Inc

Empowering and strengthening ohio's people (esop) helps adults in all stages of life achieve and maintain financial wellness and housing stability.

Housing & Shelter
7
Hospice & Palliative Care of the Ohio Valley Inc

Helping individuals live with dignity through the final stage of life.

Human Services
8
Greater Cleveland Food Bank Inc

Working together to ensure everyone in our communities has the nutritious food they need every day.

Food & Nutrition
9
Goodwill Industries of Greater Cleveland and East Central Ohio Inc

We empower people on their journey to independence through the sale of donated goods, which supports employment programs and family services.

—
10
Goodwill Industries of Central Ohio Inc

Transforming the lives of individuals with disabilities and other barriers through pathways to independence and the power of work.

Employment
11
Ashland Assisted Living Inc

To create a better world by serving people in need by operating food pantries, homeless shelters, a domestic violence shelter, affordable housing communities, senior living, assisted living and skilled care facilities, a home health care…

Human Services
12
Produce Perks Midwest Inc

To improve the health of under-served communities by increasing affordable access to healthy food.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ohio's Hospice Foundation; the most unlike its peers is With Gods Grace. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/19
Grantees still filing
12/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PINK RIBBON GOOD INC: $755,000 · HealthPINK RIBBON GOOD INCOHIO'S HOSPICE FOUNDATION: $277,000 · HealthOHIO'S HOSPICE FOUNDATION+1 more: $15,000 · HealthIndividual grant recipient: $273,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION: $165,000 · OtherALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATIONRTD: $45,000 · OtherRTDThe Learning Tree Farm Inc: $36,000 · OtherThe Learning Tree Farm IncUNITED REHABILITATION SERVICES OF GREATER DAYTON: $33,000 · OtherCHOICES: $30,000 · OtherARTEMIS CENTER FOR ALTERNATIVES TO DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $21,721 · Other+3 more: $46,476 · Other+3 moreTHE FOODBANK INC: $200,000 · Food & NutritionTHE FOODBA…WITH GODS GRACE: $25,000 · Food & NutritionWITH GODS …ST MARY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $183,000 · Housing & ShelterTHE SEEDLING FOUNDATION OF DAYTON OHIO: $75,000 · EducationCRAYONS TO CLASSROOMS: $46,000 · EducationDAYBREAK INC: $50,000 · Human ServicesCLOTHES THAT WORK: $10,000 · Human ServicesHealthy Habits Cook Club Inc: $9,435 · Human ServicesHUMANE SOCIETY OF GREATER DAYTON: $53,000 · AnimalsSociety for the Improvement of Conditions for Stray Animals: $16,000 · AnimalsTHE AIR FORCE MUSEUM FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 · Arts & CultureDAYTON INTERNATIONAL PEACE MUSEUM INC: $15,000 · Arts & Culture
Health$1,047,000Other$650,197Food & Nutrition$225,000Housing & Shelter$183,000Education$121,000Human Services$69,435Animals$69,000Arts & Culture$45,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPINK RIBBON GOOD INC: $755,000 over 9y, 6.5% of budgetOHIO'S HOSPICE FOUNDATION: $277,000 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetTHE FOODBANK INC: $200,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetST MARY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $183,000 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetTHE SEEDLING FOUNDATION OF DAYTON OHIO: $75,000 over 4y, 8.3% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF GREATER DAYTON: $53,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetDAYBREAK INC: $50,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetCRAYONS TO CLASSROOMS: $46,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetThe Learning Tree Farm Inc: $36,000 over 3y, 3.3% of budgetUNITED REHABILITATION SERVICES OF GREATER DAYTON: $33,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE AIR FORCE MUSEUM FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetWITH GODS GRACE: $25,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetARTEMIS CENTER FOR ALTERNATIVES TO DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $21,721 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetWESTCARE OHIO INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetDAYTON INTERNATIONAL PEACE MUSEUM INC: $15,000 over 1y, 6.4% of budgetLIFE ESSENTIALS INC: $11,476 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetHealthy Habits Cook Club Inc: $9,435 over 1y, 16% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Dayton FoundationDayton Foundation Dep…Dayton Foundation Plu…The CareSource Founda…The United Way of the…Mathile Family Founda…Synchrony FoundationIddings Benevolent Tr…The Berry Family Foun…Levin Family Foundati…Virginia W Kettering …Miami Valley Hospital
The Dayton FoundationOH39.9× affinity17 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Dayton Foundation · Dayton Foundation Depository · Dayton Foundation Plus Inc · The CareSource Foundation · The United Way of the Greater Dayton Area · Mathile Family Foundation · Synchrony Foundation · Iddings Benevolent Trust Xxxxx5009 · The Berry Family Foundation · Levin Family Foundation · Virginia W Kettering Foundation Xxxxx3003 · Miami Valley Hospital

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Virginia Conlogue Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Virginia Conlogue Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Virginia Conlogue’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home