· Private foundation
Vincent J and Dorothy E Ciarlante Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 49% of VINCENT J AND DOROTHY E CIARLANTE FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k10 grants · $49k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $72k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| LOUDOUN ABUSED WOMENS SHELTER | $24,000 |
| LIMESTONE ANIMAL RESCUE & ADOPTION | $15,000 |
| LEESBURG VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY | $12,500 |
| LOUDOUN COUNTY VETERANS ENG BOARD | $10,000 |
| NPR | $10,000 |
| MOSAIC VIRGINIA | $9,000 |
| CAMBRIDGE IN AMERICA | $5,000 |
| GLASCO FIRE COMPANY | $5,000 |
| CORNERSTONE CHAPEL | $5,000 |
| LIBERTY UNIVERSITY | $5,000 |
| PBS | $5,000 |
| HEARTS FOR THE LORD | $5,000 |
| TUNNELS TO TOWERS | $5,000 |
| EAT WELL EXCHANGE INC | $3,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $100k) land where the poverty rate runs at 4%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +29% since the first grant, against +4% for the ones you funded once.
18 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- LLLIFE LINE INC6× · 2020–2025 · $44k · revenue +300%
- LVLEESBURG VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY INC5× · 2020–2025 · $33k · revenue +29%
The Fistula Foundation2× · 2021–2024 · $17k · revenue +13%
Funded once
- LCLoudoun County Volunteer Fire Compaone grant, 2022 · $10k
- LFLEGACY FARMSone grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +1%
- LCLoudoun Community Veterans Engagemeone grant, 2023 · $8k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provides seminary, under-graduate, graduate, doctoral, and other continuing education programs
Witnessing to god's love for all people, we stand with and advocate for migrants and refugees, transforming communities through ministries of service and justice.
Lifewell aims to provide hope and recovery through our person-centered residential, outpatient, housing and community living programs. we provide integrated healthcare services to low-income adults with behavioral and physical illness and…
Sof is called to empower warriors to find purpose, be resilient, and live well. we develop and provide customized treatment plans for veterans through our national network of partners.
To provide food and other related products primarily to member agencies for distribution to those in need, and also for direct distribution.
Providing life-enriching services that promote well-being and build community.
Lilyfield is a christ-centered ministry devoted to providing healthy families for at-risk children and youth.
To get the good news to every nation this generation by showing and sharing god's love by providing opportunities and supporting christian missionaries in over fifty seven countries around the world.
Loaves & fishes provides nourishing food with respect and dignity to all who seek assistance, while offering robust opportunities for community engagement through volunteerism, partnerships, and nutrition education.
Time of grace is for people who want more growth and less struggle in their spiritual walk. we share the truth of god's word simply and clearly through television, print, and digital media that people view millions of times each month. we…
Empowering families and individuals experiencing homelessness to build a future filled with dignity, opportunity, and lasting solutions.
Lifewater international is a non-profit christian water development organization dedicated to effectively serving vulnerable children and families by partnering with underserved communities to overcome water poverty.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Loudoun Citizens for Social Justice and the most unlike its peers is Eatwell Exchange Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds LOUDOUN CITIZENS FOR SOCIAL JUSTICE ↗
- Who funds LIFE LINE INC ↗
- Who funds LEESBURG VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY INC ↗
- Who funds THE GLASCO FIRE COMPANY ↗
- Who funds The Fistula Foundation ↗
- Who funds LEGACY FARMS ↗
- Who funds LIBERTY UNIVERSITY INC ↗
- Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CAMBRIDGE IN AMERICA ↗
- Who funds RESET180 ↗
- Who funds EATWELL EXCHANGE INC ↗
- Who funds HANOVER EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SAINT JOHN BOSCO SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds MOBILE HOPE ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds WELCOME TO MY FATHERS HOUSE ↗
- Who funds BOULDER CREST FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF WEST VIRGINIA INC ↗
- Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Loudoun and Northern Fauquier Counties · Verizon Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Vincent J and Dorothy E Ciarlante Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.