Skip to content

· Public charity

Village Treasure House

The corporation operates as a nonprofit donation and consignment shop whose proceeds support local agencies serving individuals and families in crisis.

$251k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$1.1MHousing & Shelter$462kFood & Nutrition$307kCrime & Legal$113kHealth$89k
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$18,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$874k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CONNECTIONS FOR THE HOMELESS$24,500
YOUTH SERVICES OF GLENVIEWNORTHBROOK$21,000
HUNGER RESOURCE NETWORK$21,000
SHELTER INC$19,000
WESLEY CHILD CARE CENTER$18,600
YWCADOMESTIC VIOLENCE SERVICES$18,000
FAMILY PROMISE-CHICAGO NORTH SHORE$18,000
NORTHFIELD TOWNSHIP FOOD PANTRY$18,000
METROPOLITAN FAMILY SERVICES$14,900
CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER$13,500
THE HARBOUR INC$13,500
ERIKA'S LIGHTHOUSE$12,500
WINGS PROGRAM INC$12,500
HAVEN YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES$12,500
FAMILY SERVICE CENTER$12,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $641k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%HAVEN YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES: $16k → 14%HAVEN YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES: $16k → 14%HAVEN YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES: $15k → 14%HAVEN YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES: $13k → 14%HAVEN YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES: $10k → 14%HAVEN YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES: $8k → 14%HAVEN YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES: $8k → 14%HAVEN YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES: $6k → 14%HUNGER RESOURCE NETWORK: $21k → 14%HUNGER RESOURCE NETWORK: $19k → 14%HUNGER RESOURCE NETWORK: $18k → 14%HUNGER RESOURCE NETWORK: $15k → 14%HUNGER RESOURCE NETWORK: $15k → 14%HUNGER RESOURCE NETWORK: $12k → 14%HUNGER RESOURCE NETWORK: $12k → 14%HUNGER RESOURCE NETWORK: $10k → 14%HUNGER RESOURCE NETWORK: $6k → 14%METROPOLITAN FAMILY SERVICES: $19k → 14%METROPOLITAN FAMILY SERVICES: $16k → 14%METROPOLITAN FAMILY SERVICES: $15k → 14%METROPOLITAN FAMILY SERVICES: $15k → 14%METROPOLITAN FAMILY SERVICES: $12k → 14%METROPOLITAN FAMILY SERVICES: $8k → 14%METROPOLITAN FAMILY SERVICES: $8k → 14%METROPOLITAN FAMILY SERVICES: $7k → 14%YOUTH SERVICES OF GLENVIEWNORTHBROOK: $30k → 14%YOUTH SERVICES OF GLENVIEWNORTHBROOK: $28k → 14%YOUTH SERVICES OF GLENVIEWNORTHBROOK: $26k → 14%YOUTH SERVICES OF GLENVIEWNORTHBROOK: $22k → 14%YOUTH SERVICES OF GLENVIEWNORTHBROOK: $22k → 14%YOUTH SERVICES OF GLENVIEWNORTHBROOK: $21k → 14%YOUTH SERVICES OF GLENVIEWNORTHBROOK: $19k → 14%YOUTH SERVICES OF GLENVIEWNORTHBROOK: $17k → 14%YOUTH SERVICES OF GLENVIEWNORTHBROOK: $9k → 14%THE HARBOUR INC: $21k → 14%THE HARBOUR INC: $18k → 14%THE HARBOUR INC: $18k → 14%THE HARBOUR INC: $15k → 14%THE HARBOUR INC: $14k → 14%THE HARBOUR INC: $14k → 14%THE HARBOUR INC: $12k → 14%THE HARBOUR INC: $12k → 14%THE HARBOUR INC: $7k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.1M · 16 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

16 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
0

Total granted

$2.1M
$0

Still filing today

100%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterFood & NutritionCrime & LegalHealthReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CF
    CONNECTIONS FOR THE HOMELESS INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $197k · revenue +370%
  • YS
    YOUTH SERVICES OF GLENVIEWNORTHBROOK
    9× · 2017–2025 · $193k · revenue +286%
  • WC
    Wesley Child Care Center
    9× · 2017–2025 · $179k · revenue +31%

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field

    Closest unfunded matches

    The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    Child Link Inc

    Child Link provides foster care, family counseling, and therapy services to Chicago area adolescents who are at risk of homelessness. Child Link also refers adolescents to other agencies that are able to provide additional resources and…

    Human Services
    2
    Center for Family Services

    Administering an array of critical, intensive therapeutic interventions and/or facilitation services to emotionally and behaviorally disturbed clients for whom DCFS is legally responsible in order to stabilize their traditional or home of…

    Human Services
    3
    Child & Family Services of Northwestern Michigan Inc

    We strive to ensure the safety and well-being of children, youth, adults, and families in times of crisis, challenge, and life transition.

    —
    4
    Lakeside Community Committee

    To enhance the quality of life for children and families by inspiring hope and empowerment and growth within all whom we serve.

    Human Services
    5
    Family Counseling Services of No Il

    To foster stronger communities by providing individuals with accessible, professional counseling and mental health care that empowers them to thrive

    Human Services
    6
    Network Services

    Network services has been serving homeless families in the puget sound area since 1990, with a focus on families with children. network services aims to break the cycle of homelessness by providing assistance to families with children to…

    Human Services
    7
    Family Assistance Program

    Our agency provides tools necessary to create healthy interpersonal relationships, economic empowerment, and stable housing for victims of domestic violence, their children and runaway youth.

    —
    8
    House of Hope Green Bay Inc

    House of hope green bay provides a safe and supportive place where youth and young families with children experiencing homelessness will be come confident, independent, and successful members of our community. house of hope envisions a…

    —
    9
    Respond Now

    Respond now connects those in need with health, hunger, and housing services in the chicago southland.

    Human Services
    10
    Youth Service Bureau

    The Youth Service Bureau provides services to at-risk youth who are, or are at risk of becoming, runaway, abused, neglected and/or homeless. Services are also available for their family members.

    —
    11
    Youth and Family Counseling

    Youth & Family Counseling is a nonprofit organization dedicated to opening doors to mental healthcare so people can cope, heal and thrive. Their work addresses the root causes and systemic barriers that limit access to behavioral…

    Human Services
    12
    Family Service Agency of Waukesha County Inc

    Building stronger communities, strengthening families, and empowering individuals through compassionate, life changing programs and behavioral health services.

    Human Services
    How this is measured
    The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Connections for the Homeless Inc; the most unlike its peers is Wesley Child Care Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
    04the grantee network

    16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    11
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    16/16
    Grantees still filing
    15/16
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    YOUTH SERVICES OF GLENVIEWNORTHBROOK: $192,913 · Human ServicesYOUTH SERVICES OF GLENVIEWNORTHBROOKTHE HARBOUR INC: $129,500 · Human ServicesTHE HARBOUR INCHUNGER RESOURCE NETWORK: $128,550 · Human ServicesHUNGER RESOURCE NETWORKMetropolitan Family Services: $99,900 · Human ServicesMetropolitan Family ServicesTHE FAMILY SERVICE CENTER OF WILMETTE GLENVIEW NORTHBROOK AND KENILWORTH: $92,750 · Human ServicesTHE FAMILY SERVICE CENTER OF WILMETTE G…HAVEN YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES INC: $90,500 · Human ServicesHAVEN YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES INCWesley Child Care Center: $179,100 · OtherWesley Child Care CenterYWCA EvanstonNorth Shore: $178,500 · OtherYWCA EvanstonNorth ShoreFAMILY PROMISE CHICAGO NORTH SHORE: $135,500 · OtherFAMILY PROMISE CHICAGO NOR…CONNECTIONS FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $197,000 · Housing & ShelterCONNECTIONS FOR THE HOME…SHELTER INC: $146,250 · Housing & ShelterSHELTER INCWINGS PROGRAM INC: $109,100 · Housing & ShelterWINGS PROGRAM INCNORTHFIELD TOWNSHIP FOOD PANTRY: $178,750 · Food & NutritionNORTHFIEL…CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF NORTH & NORTHWEST COOK COUNTY: $113,250 · Crime & LegalErikas Lighthouse A Beacon of Hope for Adolescent Depression: $88,587 · HealthThe Hap Foundation Inc (F/K/A Journeycare Foundation): $33,250 · Religion
    Human Services$734,113Other$493,100Housing & Shelter$452,350Food & Nutrition$178,750Crime & Legal$113,250Health$88,587Religion$33,250

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCONNECTIONS FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $197,000 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetYOUTH SERVICES OF GLENVIEWNORTHBROOK: $192,913 over 9y, 1.5% of budgetWesley Child Care Center: $179,100 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetNORTHFIELD TOWNSHIP FOOD PANTRY: $178,750 over 9y, 6.4% of budgetYWCA EvanstonNorth Shore: $178,500 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetSHELTER INC: $146,250 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE CHICAGO NORTH SHORE: $135,500 over 9y, 8.1% of budgetTHE HARBOUR INC: $129,500 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetHUNGER RESOURCE NETWORK: $128,550 over 9y, 10% of budgetCHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF NORTH & NORTHWEST COOK COUNTY: $113,250 over 9y, 1.3% of budgetWINGS PROGRAM INC: $109,100 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetMetropolitan Family Services: $99,900 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FAMILY SERVICE CENTER OF WILMETTE GLENVIEW NORTHBROOK AND KENILWORTH: $92,750 over 8y, 1.8% of budgetHAVEN YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES INC: $90,500 over 8y, 2.0% of budgetErikas Lighthouse A Beacon of Hope for Adolescent Depression: $88,587 over 8y, 1.7% of budgetThe Hap Foundation Inc (F/K/A Journeycare Foundation): $33,250 over 5y, 0.5% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds CONNECTIONS FOR THE HOMELESS INC ↗
    • Who funds YOUTH SERVICES OF GLENVIEWNORTHBROOK ↗
    • Who funds Wesley Child Care Center ↗
    • Who funds NORTHFIELD TOWNSHIP FOOD PANTRY ↗
    • Who funds YWCA EvanstonNorth Shore ↗
    • Who funds SHELTER INC ↗
    • Who funds FAMILY PROMISE CHICAGO NORTH SHORE ↗
    • Who funds THE HARBOUR INC ↗
    • Who funds HUNGER RESOURCE NETWORK ↗
    • Who funds CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF NORTH & NORTHWEST COOK COUNTY ↗
    • Who funds WINGS PROGRAM INC ↗
    • Who funds Metropolitan Family Services ↗
    • Who funds THE FAMILY SERVICE CENTER OF WILMETTE GLENVIEW NORTHBROOK AND KENILWORTH ↗
    • Who funds HAVEN YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
    • Who funds Erikas Lighthouse A Beacon of Hope for Adolescent Depression ↗
    • Who funds The Hap Foundation Inc (F/K/A Journeycare Foundation) ↗

    Co-funders

    Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    The Chicago Community TrustIL18.8× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: The Chicago Community Trust · Baxter International Foundation · AbbVie Foundation · Dermody Properties Foundation · Arthur J Gallagher Foundation · Accent Charitable Fund · Evanston Community Foundation · First Bank Chicago Foundation · George M Eisenberg Foundation for Charities · Circle of Service Foundation · Motorola Solutions Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation

    How this is measured
    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization Village Treasure House funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Village Treasure House. Bigger dots raise more.

    2024
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
      typical government reliance, FY20–25
      How this is measured
      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

      How this is measured
      Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

      Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      Play a game based on Village Treasure House’s filings →

      More from the funding graph