Skip to content

· Private foundation

Villa Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$183k
Granted FY2024still arriving
19
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$23k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$279kInternational$172kYouth Development$143kHousing & Shelter$89kEducation$72kEmployment$26kScience & Tech$17kPhilanthropy$11kOther$0
02FY2024 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k11 grants · $46k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $137k
$7,500
Median grant
6
States reached
$1.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SSJ HEALTH FOUNDATION INC$23,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$22,500
HOMELESS PRENATAL PROGRAM$20,000
BRANCHES$17,000
FOUNDATION COMMUNITIES$15,000
AGAINST MALARIA FOUNDATION$15,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB$14,500
EPISCOPAL COMMUNITY SERVICES OF SAN FRANCISCO$10,000
DENTAL LIFELINE NETWORK$7,500
MISSION GRADUATES$7,500
USIT FOUNDATION$6,000
CHAPMAN PARTNERSHIP WORKFORCE TRADES PROGRAM$6,000
FLYNN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL$5,075
AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION$4,250
KIDS IN DISTRESS$4,250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $80k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%KIDS IN DISTRESS: $4k → 13%CHAPMAN PARTNERSHIP WORKFORCE TRADES PROGRAM: $6k → 15%CHAPMAN PARTNERSHIP WORKFORCE TRADES PROGRAM: $5k → 15%CHAPMAN PARTNERSHIP WORKFORCE TRADES PROGRAM: $5k → 15%CHAPMAN PARTNERSHIP WORKFORCE TRADES PROGRAM: $5k → 15%EPISCOPAL COMMUNITY SERVICES OF SAN FRANCISCO: $10k → 10%CHAPMAN PARTNERSHIP WORKFORCE TRADES PROGRAM: $5k → 15%EPISCOPAL COMMUNITY SERVICES OF SAN FRANCISCO: $10k → 10%EPISCOPAL COMMUNITY SERVICES OF SAN FRANCISCO: $8k → 10%EPISCOPAL COMMUNITY SERVICES OF SAN FRANCISCO: $8k → 10%EPISCOPAL COMMUNITY SERVICES OF SAN FRANCISCO: $8k → 10%EPISCOPAL COMMUNITY SERVICES OF SAN FRANCISCO: $3k → 10%EPISCOPAL COMMUNITY SERVICES OF SAN FRANCISCO: $2k → 10%EPISCOPAL COMMUNITY SERVICES OF SAN FRANCISCO: $2k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
IL
NY
PA
CA
MO
VA
MD
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$846k · 25 repeat orgs$75k to everyone else

25 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
18

Total granted

$846k
$37k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+67%

Still filing today

56%
28%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $38k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthInternationalHuman ServicesArts & CultureScience & TechOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TA
    The Against Malaria Foundation
    8× · 2017–2024 · $82k · revenue +29%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $80k · revenue +98%
  • MG
    MISSION GRADUATES
    7× · 2017–2024 · $72k · revenue +337%

Funded once

  • HF
    HONNOLD FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $8k
  • CH
    CAMILLUS HEALTH
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • FS
    FROST SCIENCE MEMBERSHIPGIVING CIRCLE
    one grant, 2018 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
2
University of Miami
—
3
The International School of San Francisco

Guided by the principles of academic rigor and diversity, the international school of san francisco offers programs of study in french and english to prepare its graduates for a world in which the ability to think critically and to…

Education
4
Enterprise for Youth

Enterprise for youth empowers under-resourced san francisco youths to reach their potential through transformative paid internship experiences supported by a community of employers, caring adults, and peers.

Youth Development
5
Future House Inc

Our mission is to build an ai scientist, or ai systems, that can automate scientific research and accelerate the pace of discovery, so humanity can find cures for disease, solutions for climate change, and other species-accelerating…

Science & Tech
6
Dev Mission

Train untapped young adults ages 16-24 for careers in the Tech industry so we can build wealth and prosperity in local diverse communities.

Youth Development
7
Activate Global Inc

Activate empowers scientists to reinvent the world by bringing their research to market. activate partners with u.s. based funders, research institutions, and other pillars of the hard technology community to help entrepreneurial…

Environment
8
Mission Preparatory Inc

The mission preparatory school equips students with the knowledge, skills, and strength of character needed to succeed in college and serve as leaders in their communities.

Education
9
Dominican University of California

Our institutional mission is to educate and prepare students to be ethical leaders and socially responsible global citizens who incorporate the dominican values of study, reflection, community and service into their lives.

Education
10
Parents for Public Schools of San Francisco

PPS-SF's mission is to promote the fundamental value of public education and pursue the success of every public school by sharing knowledge, bridging communities, and informing policy.

—
11
Miami-Dade Innovation Authority Inc

Miami-dade innovation authority bridges the gap between private innovators and the public sector to fast track innovation that improves quality of life for miamians.

Science & Tech
12
AI4ALL

Ai4all's mission is to ensure that the next generation of ai leaders reflects humanity. ai4all is transforming the pipeline of ai practitioners who will shape ai for the benefit of humanity.

Youth Development
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kids in Distress Inc; the most unlike its peers is Usit Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/26
Grantees still filing
14/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BRANCHES INC: $106,500 · OtherBRANCHES INCDENTAL LIFELINE NETWORK: $97,500 · OtherDENTAL LIFELINE NETWORKMISSION GRADUATES: $72,000 · OtherMISSION GRADUATESBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS: $42,300 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUBSHONNOLD FOUNDATION - SOLAR AID: $26,000 · OtherHONNOLD FOUNDATION - SOLAR AIDCASA SAN JUAN BOSCO INC: $24,000 · Other+25 more: $102,688 · Other+25 moreThe Against Malaria Foundation: $82,000 · HealthThe Against Malaria Founda…Homeless Prenatal Program Inc: $69,700 · HealthHomeless Prenatal Program …ADOM HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $63,865 · HealthADOM HEALTH FOUNDATION INCMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $80,000 · InternationalMEDECINS S…+2 more: $3,100 · InternationalEPISCOPAL COMMUNITY SERVICES OF SAN FRANCISCO: $49,645 · Human ServicesEPISCOPAL…CHAPMAN PARTNERSHIP INC: $26,000 · Human ServicesCHAPMAN P…KIDS IN DISTRESS INC: $4,250 · Human ServicesUSIT Foundation: $23,500 · EducationThiebaut Method: $10,080 · EducationMission Kids: $9,500 · EducationUniversity of Miami: $2,250 · EducationRAVENSWOOD EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $2,200 · Education+1 more: $500 · EducationFOUNDATION COMMUNITIES INC: $15,000 · Housing & ShelterTHE EXPLORATORIUM: $8,025 · Arts & CultureCALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES: $6,828 · Arts & Culture
Other$470,988Health$215,565International$83,100Human Services$79,895Education$48,030Housing & Shelter$15,000Arts & Culture$14,853

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Against Malaria Foundation: $82,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $80,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMISSION GRADUATES: $72,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetHomeless Prenatal Program Inc: $69,700 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetADOM HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $63,865 over 5y, 5.2% of budgetEPISCOPAL COMMUNITY SERVICES OF SAN FRANCISCO: $49,645 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCHAPMAN PARTNERSHIP INC: $26,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCASA SAN JUAN BOSCO INC: $24,000 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetUSIT Foundation: $23,500 over 3y, 6.6% of budgetFOUNDATION COMMUNITIES INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThiebaut Method: $10,080 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetMission Kids: $9,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetTHE EXPLORATORIUM: $8,025 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES: $6,828 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetFull Circle Fund: $5,105 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetKIDS IN DISTRESS INC: $4,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MIAMI FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCORAL GABLES COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetASPIRA ASSOCIATION INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC: $2,400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Miami: $2,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRAVENSWOOD EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $2,200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMAKEMIA MAKERSPACE INC: $2,000 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetROBOTICS FOR ALL INC: $1,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetEDUCATE TOMORROW CORP: $700 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The Against Malaria Foundation ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds MISSION GRADUATES ↗
  • Who funds Homeless Prenatal Program Inc ↗
  • Who funds ADOM HEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds EPISCOPAL COMMUNITY SERVICES OF SAN FRANCISCO ↗
  • Who funds CHAPMAN PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
  • Who funds CASA SAN JUAN BOSCO INC ↗
  • Who funds USIT Foundation ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION COMMUNITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds Thiebaut Method ↗
  • Who funds Mission Kids ↗
  • Who funds THE EXPLORATORIUM ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES ↗
  • Who funds Full Circle Fund ↗
  • Who funds KIDS IN DISTRESS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MIAMI FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CORAL GABLES COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ASPIRA ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds GLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds University of Miami ↗
  • Who funds RAVENSWOOD EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MAKEMIA MAKERSPACE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Silicon Valley Community FoundationCA15.4× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Silicon Valley Community Foundation · The Miami Foundation Inc · United Way Miami Inc · The San Francisco Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Network for Good · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Villa Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Villa Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • University of Miami: 5% of income from government
  • Chapman Partnership Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Kids in Distress Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Educate Tomorrow Corp: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Villa Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Villa Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 49 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Villa Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph