Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Vierra Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$158k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
0189% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Health$135kRecreation & Sports$30kHuman Services$20kYouth Development$5kCivil Rights$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k16 grants · $83k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$5,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$2.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
INSTITUTE FOR CHILDREN'S MENTAL HEALTH$50,000
SPECIAL OLYMPICS COLORADO$25,000
Individual grant recipient$7,500
MOUNTAIN STATES CHILDREN'S HOME$5,000
CHILDREN'S DIABETES FOUNDATION$5,000
FREEDOM SERVICE DOGS$5,000
ENCIRCLE$5,000
NAMI COLORADO$5,000
NATIONAL BRAIN TUMOR SOCIETY$5,000
WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT$5,000
THE CENTER ON COLFAX$5,000
TALL TALES RANCH$5,000
ARC OF COLORADO$5,000
ST BALDRICK'S FOUNDATION$5,000
HEARTS & HORSES$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY25–25, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 25% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ENCIRCLE: $5k → 8%MOUNTAIN STATES CHILDREN'S HOME: $5k → 9%ARC OF COLORADO: $5k → 12%FREEDOM SERVICE DOGS: $5k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
North Range Behavioral Health

North range behavioral health is dedicated to providing professional, comprehensive mental health and substance use disorder services.

Health
2
Colorado Therapeutic Riding Center

To change the lives of people with disabilities by promoting their physical, psychological and social well-being through equine-assisted activities.

3
Youth Seen

The mission of Youth Seenis to foster and empower the social and emotional well-being of LGBTQI youth and their families.

Youth Development
4
Bicycle Colorado

We lead a passionate and growing movement that champions the interests of everyone who rides or wants to ride a bicycle in our state.

Education
5
Family Voices Colorado Inc

Making colorado a better place for children and youth with special healthcare needs.

Human Services
6
The Arc of Northeast Colorado

The arc of northeast colorado promotes and protects the rights of people with intellectual and developmental disabilities through empowerment, advocacy and community outreach.

Human Services
7
No Barriers Usa

We nbsp;cultivate nbsp;a nbsp;mindset nbsp;in nbsp;people nbsp;affected nbsp;by nbsp;disabilities nbsp;to nbsp;break nbsp;through nbsp;barriers nbsp;and nbsp;elevate nbsp;their nbsp;lives nbsp;and nbsp;communities

International
8
National Alliance On Mental Illness - Colorado Springs

Nami colorado springs exists to educate, support, and advocate for people and families who are living with mental illness in the pikes peak region.

9
Arc of West Central Colorado

The Arc of West Central Colorado is organized exclusively for charitable, religious, educational and scientific purposes, including, for such purposes, the making of distributions to organizations that qualify as exempt organizations…

Human Services
10
Colorado Discover Ability

Provide adaptive sports for the disabled.

Recreation & Sports
11
National Sports Center for the Disabled Inc

Our mission is to advance the power of people with all abilities through adaptive innovation and the joy of recreation and outdoor experiences. continued on schedule o

Recreation & Sports
12
Arc Thrift Stores Inc

As one of the nations largest employers of individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities, we believe in the power of employment to foster independence and fulfillment. By providing enriching job opportunities and educational…

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Roundup River Ranch and the most unlike its peers is Mountain States Children's Home. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
9/14
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

INSTITUTE FOR CHILDREN'S MENTAL HEALTH — $50,000 · OtherINSTITUTE FOR CHILDREN'S MENTAL HEALTHINST FOR CHILD MENTAL DISORDERS — $50,000 · OtherINST FOR CHILD MENTAL DISORDERSIndividual grant recipient — $7,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT — $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $5,000 · OtherGAY LESBIAN BISEXUAL & TRANSGEND COMMUNITY CENTER OF COLORADO — $5,000 · OtherNATIONAL BRAIN TUMOR SOCIETY INC — $5,000 · OtherSPECIAL OLYMPICS COLORADO — $25,000 · Recreation & SportsSPECIAL OLYMPICS…ROUNDUP RIVER RANCH — $5,000 · Recreation & SportsROUNDUP RIVER RA…THE ARC OF COLORADO — $5,000 · Human ServicesTHE ARC OF…Encircle Family and Youth Resource Center — $5,000 · Human ServicesEncircle F…FREEDOM SERVICE DOGS INC — $5,000 · Human ServicesFREEDOM SE…Mountain States Children's Home — $5,000 · Human ServicesMountain S…CHILDREN'S DIABETES FOUNDATION — $5,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S…NAMI COLORADO — $5,000 · HealthNAMI COLOR…HEARTS & HORSES INC — $5,000 · HealthHEARTS & H…TALL TALES RANCH — $5,000 · HealthTALL TALES…THE HAPPY CREW INC — $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentST BALDRICK'S FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 · Philanthropy
Other$127,500Recreation & Sports$30,000Human Services$20,000Health$20,000Youth Development$5,000Philanthropy$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS COLORADO — $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHEARTS & HORSES INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFREEDOM SERVICE DOGS INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetST BALDRICK'S FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROUNDUP RIVER RANCH — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Colorado Gives FoundationCO19× affinity7 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Vierra Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph