Skip to content

· Private foundation

Vess Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$615k
Granted FY2024still arriving
23
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$310k
Largest
01What it funds
0183% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Civil Rights$740kHuman Services$615kHealth$601kPublic Benefit$418kEducation$388kReligion$225kHousing & Shelter$219kPublic Safety & Disaster$143kOther$0
02FY2024 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $28k
  • $10k–50k15 grants · $227k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
  • $250k+1 grant · $310k
$12,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$13M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
True the Vote$310,000
Individual grant recipient$50,000
Wichita Children's Home$30,000
Catholic Charities Inc$20,000
Cambodian Children's Fund$20,000
Center of Hope Inc$20,000
Tom's Door$16,000
St Jude Children's Research Hospital$16,000
Guadalupe Clinic$15,000
Samaritan's Purse$15,000
TOP Early Learning Center$12,500
Tunnel to Towers$12,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Kansans for Life$10,000
The Lord's Diner$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $708k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 69% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Rainbows United Inc: $17k → 8%Tom's Door: $20k → 6%Third Option Foundation: $20k → 6%Rainbows United Inc: $15k → 8%Tom's Door: $19k → 6%Third Option Foundation: $20k → 6%Rainbows United Inc: $13k → 8%Wichita Children's Home: $38k → 16%Tom's Door: $16k → 6%Third Option Foundation: $5k → 6%Wichita Children's Home: $35k → 16%Tom's Door: $16k → 6%Wichita Children's Home: $30k → 16%Tom's Door: $16k → 6%Wichita Children's Home: $30k → 16%Tom's Door: $16k → 6%Wichita Children's Home: $30k → 16%Tom's Door: $16k → 6%Wichita Children's Home: $30k → 16%Tom's Door: $12k → 6%Wichita Children's Home: $23k → 16%Wichita Children's Home: $23k → 16%Wichita Family Crisis Center: $100k → 16%Rainbows United: $5k → 16%Catholic Charities Inc: $35k → 16%Catholic Charities Inc: $32k → 16%Catholic Charities Inc: $26k → 16%Catholic Charities Inc: $20k → 16%Catholic Charities Inc: $20k → 16%Catholic Charities Inc: $14k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
IA
CA
CO
MO
VA
KS
TN
NC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.7M · 33 repeat orgs$284k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +50% since the first grant, against +33% for those funded once.

33 repeat relationships: 21 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

33
8

Total granted

$3.7M
$277k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
+33%

Still filing today

61%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthEducationPhilanthropyReligionCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TT
    TRUE THE VOTE INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $710k · revenue +26%
  • KH
    KVC HEALTH SYSTEMS INC
    3× · 2019–2022 · $440k · revenue +223%
  • TW
    THE WICHITA CHILDREN'S HOME
    8× · 2017–2024 · $238k · revenue +99%

Funded once

  • WF
    WICHITA FAMILY CRISIS CENTER
    one grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue -16%
  • L4
    LEAGUE 42 FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $75k · revenue -39%
  • CF
    CENTER FOR COMBATING HUMAN TRAFFICKING
    one grant, 2023 · $40k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Catholic Charities of Kansas City - St Joseph Inc

Helping people move to a better life through hope-filled care, services, and advocacy; calling all those of goodwill to join us

Human Services
2
Wichita Falls Faith Mission Inc

To provide christ-centered programs and services that lead the homeless toward self-sufficiency.

Religion
3
Wichitas Littlest Heroes

Wichita's littlest heroes (wlh) exists to provide hope, help, and happiness to families of children ages 0-18 in the kansas area who are battling life-threatening medical conditions. wlh strives to accomplish this be being a physical and…

Human Services
4
Wichita Habitat for Humanity Inc

At wichita habitat for humanity, we believe everyone deserves the strength, stability, and independence that comes with a safe, affordable home. we partner with hardworking individuals and families in our community, empowering them to…

Housing & Shelter
5
Safehouse Crisis Center Inc

To provide shelter and advocacy services to victims of domestic violence, sexual assault, and stalking in the 11 counties of southeast kansas.

Human Services
6
Safehome Inc

To break the cycle of domestic violence and partner abuse for victims and their children by providing shelter, advocacy, counseling and prevention education in our community.

Human Services
7
Guadalupe Health Foundation

To support, assist and promote the interests and welfare of the programs and activities of the catholic diocese of wichita which provide health care services and health education to poor, distressed and underprivileged individuals.

—
8
Freedom House Ministries

House of Hope Kansas City is unique, because we work with teens and their parents to find solutions and ultimately, restoration of healthy family relationships. We serve families in crisis with our program for residents to experience the…

Education
9
Welcome House Inc

The Welcome House is a non-profit, sober living, recovery program (incorporated in 1971) with the sole purpose of educating and rehabilitating the adult male alcoholic/ addict and the expressed mission of returning the individual to…

Health
10
Hunter Health Clinic

Hunter health (the center) operates three healthcare centers in wichita, ks. the center provides a broad range of health services to a largely medically underserved population. the us dept. of health and human services (dhhs) and indian…

—
11
Kansas Healthcare Collaborative Inc

Engaging and aligning providers and stakeholders to establish Kansas as a role model for health care quality and a top performer in health care outcomes.

Health
12
Crisis Center of West Texas

Crisis center of west texas' mission is to respond, shelter, and educate to end domestic and sexual violence in west texas.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Catholic Charities Inc; the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/29
Grantees still filing
21/29
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AMERICANS FOR AMERICA: $218,000 · OtherAMERICANS FOR AMERICASt Thomas Aquinas Church: $207,500 · OtherSt Thomas Aquinas ChurchIndividual grant recipient: $200,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTURNING POINT USA INC: $200,000 · OtherTURNING POINT USA INCCenter of Hope Inc: $167,500 · OtherCenter of Hope IncTOP Early Learning Center: $86,000 · OtherTOP Early Learning Center+19 more: $399,250 · Other+19 moreTHE WICHITA CHILDREN'S HOME: $237,500 · Human ServicesTHE WICHITA CHILDREN…CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC: $146,000 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES I…TOM'S DOOR INC: $130,500 · Human ServicesTOM'S DOOR INCWICHITA FAMILY CRISIS CENTER: $100,000 · Human ServicesWICHITA FAMILY CRISI…RAINBOWS UNITED INC: $49,000 · Human ServicesRAINBOWS UNITED INCTHIRD OPTION FOUNDATION: $45,000 · Human ServicesTHIRD OPTION FOUNDAT…+1 more: $10,000 · Human ServicesTRUE THE VOTE INC: $710,000 · Civil RightsTRUE THE VOTE INCKVC HEALTH SYSTEMS INC: $440,000 · HealthKVC HEALTH SYSTE…ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $120,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN…+2 more: $12,250 · HealthWICHITA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $220,864 · EducationCHILDREN FIRST CEO KANSAS INC: $60,000 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $21,000 · EducationCambodian Childrens Fund: $90,000 · PhilanthropyHelping a HeroOrg: $15,000 · PhilanthropyLEAGUE 42 FOUNDATION: $75,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$1,478,250Human Services$718,000Civil Rights$710,000Health$572,250Education$301,864Philanthropy$105,000Recreation & Sports$75,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTRUE THE VOTE INC: $710,000 over 3y, 6.3% of budgetKVC HEALTH SYSTEMS INC: $440,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetTHE WICHITA CHILDREN'S HOME: $237,500 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetWICHITA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $220,864 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetAMERICANS FOR AMERICA: $218,000 over 3y, 12% of budgetTURNING POINT USA INC: $200,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCenter of Hope Inc: $167,500 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES INC: $146,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetTOM'S DOOR INC: $130,500 over 8y, 15% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $120,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetWICHITA FAMILY CRISIS CENTER: $100,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetCambodian Childrens Fund: $90,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetLEAGUE 42 FOUNDATION: $75,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetCHILDREN FIRST CEO KANSAS INC: $60,000 over 7y, 2.9% of budgetRAINBOWS UNITED INC: $49,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $45,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHIRD OPTION FOUNDATION: $45,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetKANSAS BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS INC: $30,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetHUMANKIND MINISTRIES WICHITA INC: $30,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetKansans For Life Inc: $30,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetGuadalupe Clinic Inc: $25,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $21,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHelping a HeroOrg: $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetICT FOOD RESCUE INC: $13,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S TUMOR FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBike Walk Wichita Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $2,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TRUE THE VOTE INC ↗
  • Who funds KVC HEALTH SYSTEMS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE WICHITA CHILDREN'S HOME ↗
  • Who funds WICHITA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AMERICANS FOR AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds TURNING POINT USA INC ↗
  • Who funds Center of Hope Inc ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds TOM'S DOOR INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds WICHITA FAMILY CRISIS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Cambodian Childrens Fund ↗
  • Who funds LEAGUE 42 FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN FIRST CEO KANSAS INC ↗
  • Who funds RAINBOWS UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds THIRD OPTION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR COMBATING HUMAN TRAFFICKING ↗
  • Who funds KANSAS BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds HUMANKIND MINISTRIES WICHITA INC ↗
  • Who funds Kansans For Life Inc ↗
  • Who funds Guadalupe Clinic Inc ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Helping a HeroOrg ↗
  • Who funds ICT FOOD RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S TUMOR FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Wichita FoundationKS30.2× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Wichita Foundation · Goebel Family-Star Lumber Charitable Trust · Textron Charitable Trust Dtd 122353 · Daniel J Taylor Family Charitable Foundation · United Way of the Plains Inc · Dwane L and Velma Lunt Wallace Charitable Foundation · Ima Foundation · Mann Family Foundation · Belin Foundation · The Fidelity Bank Foundation · Bruce G Cochener Foundation · Berry Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Vess Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Vess Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Vess Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph