Skip to content

· Public charity

Vance Memorial Fund Uw

Trust assets are invested to provide income to be distributed to the charities named in the governing document.

$91k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$11k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$572kYouth Development$95kEducation$51kHealth$45k
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$11,431
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE CROSSNORE SCHOOL AND CHILDRENS HOME$11,431
NAZARETH CHILDRENS HOME$11,431
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF CABARRUS COUNTY$11,431
MASONIC AND EASTERN STAR HOME$11,431
CHILDRENS HOPE ALLIANCE$11,431
THOMPSON CHILD AND FAMILY FOCUS$11,431
MASONIC HOME FOR CHILDREN AT OXFORD$11,431
FLORENCE CRITTENTON SERVICES INC$11,431
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $319k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 90% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CHILDRENS HOPE ALLIANCE: $11k → 9%MASONIC HOME FOR CHILDREN AT OXFORD: $12k → 11%NAZARETH CHILDRENS HOME: $12k → 15%MASONIC AND EASTERN STAR HOME: $12k → 16%CHILDRENS HOPE ALLIANCE: $11k → 9%MASONIC HOME FOR CHILDREN AT OXFORD: $11k → 11%NAZARETH CHILDRENS HOME: $11k → 15%MASONIC AND EASTERN STAR HOME: $11k → 16%CHILDRENS HOPE ALLIANCE: $10k → 9%MASONIC HOME FOR CHILDREN AT OXFORD: $11k → 11%NAZARETH CHILDRENS HOME: $11k → 15%MASONIC AND EASTERN STAR HOME: $11k → 16%Masonic Home For Children at Oxford: $10k → 11%Nazareth Children's Home Inc: $10k → 15%Masonic & Eastern Star Home: $10k → 16%Masonic Home For Children at Oxford: $10k → 11%Nazareth Children's Home Inc: $10k → 15%Masonic & Eastern Star Home: $10k → 16%MASONIC HOME FOR CHILDREN AT OXFORD: $10k → 11%NAZARETH CHILDRENS HOME: $10k → 15%MASONIC AND EASTERN STAR HOME: $10k → 16%Masonic Home For Children at Oxford: $10k → 11%Nazareth Children's Home Inc: $10k → 15%Masonic & Eastern Star Home: $10k → 16%Masonic Home For Children at Oxford: $10k → 11%Nazareth Children's Home Inc: $10k → 15%Masonic & Eastern Star Home: $10k → 16%Masonic Home For Children at Oxford: $10k → 11%Nazareth Children's Home Inc: $10k → 15%Masonic & Eastern Star Home: $10k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$763k · 8 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
0

Total granted

$763k
$0

Still filing today

100%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • THE MASONIC HOME FOR CHILDREN AT OXFORD INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $95k · revenue +52%
  • BA
    Boys and Girls Club of Cabarrus County Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $95k · revenue +20%
  • TC
    THOMPSON CHILD & FAMILY FOCUS INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $95k · revenue +514%

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field

    Closest unfunded matches

    The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    Children's Home Society of North Carolina Inc

    The Children's Home Society of North Carolina's mission is to promote the right of every child to a permanent, safe, and loving family.

    Human Services
    2
    Church of God Children's Home of North Carolina Inc

    To provide a positive and safe living environment for hurting, abused, neglected and at-risk children placed privately and by the north carolina department of social services

    Human Services
    3
    Carolina Family Connections

    Recruit and train and license foster parents to receive foster children from county government agencies.

    Human Services
    4
    Carolina Family Health Centers Inc

    Carolina Family Health Centers, Inc. provides accessible and affordable health care with excellence...where patients come FIRST

    —
    5
    Coastal Carolinas Health Alliance

    Facilitate networking among hospitals

    Health
    6
    Covenant HomeCare

    Covenant HomeCare provides quality healthcare, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health, regardless of the patient's ability to pay.

    Health
    7
    National Church Residences At Home Hospice Central Ohio

    Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors

    —
    8
    National Church Residences At Home Hospice

    Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors

    —
    9
    National Church Residences At Home Central Ohio

    Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors.

    —
    10
    National Church Residences At Home Health and Wellness Central Ohio

    Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors

    —
    11
    National Church Residences Chillicothe Land Holdings Inc

    Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors

    —
    12
    Ncr At Home Health and Wellness

    Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors

    —
    How this is measured
    The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Masonic Home for Children At Oxford Inc; the most unlike its peers is Thompson Child & Family Focus Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
    04the grantee network

    8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    1
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    8/8
    Grantees still filing
    7/8
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    THE MASONIC HOME FOR CHILDREN AT OXFORD INC: $95,373 · Human ServicesTHE MASONIC HOME FOR CHILDREN AT OXFORD INCNAZARETH CHILDREN'S HOME INC: $95,373 · Human ServicesNAZARETH CHILDREN'S HOME INCMASONIC AND EASTERN STAR HOME OF NORTH CAROLINA INC: $95,373 · Human ServicesMASONIC AND EASTERN STAR HOME OF NORTH CAROLINA INCCHILDREN'S HOPE ALLIANCE: $95,373 · Human ServicesCHILDREN'S HOPE ALLIANCETHOMPSON CHILD & FAMILY FOCUS INC: $95,373 · OtherTHOMPSON CHILD & FAMILY FOCU…FLORENCE CRITTENTON INC: $95,373 · OtherFLORENCE CRITTENTON INCCROSSNORE COMMUNITIES FOR CHILDREN: $95,373 · HealthCROSSNORE COMM…Boys and Girls Club of Cabarrus County Inc: $95,373 · Youth DevelopmentBoys and Girls…
    Human Services$381,492Other$190,746Health$95,373Youth Development$95,373

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCROSSNORE COMMUNITIES FOR CHILDREN: $95,373 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetTHE MASONIC HOME FOR CHILDREN AT OXFORD INC: $95,373 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetBoys and Girls Club of Cabarrus County Inc: $95,373 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetTHOMPSON CHILD & FAMILY FOCUS INC: $95,373 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetNAZARETH CHILDREN'S HOME INC: $95,373 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetMASONIC AND EASTERN STAR HOME OF NORTH CAROLINA INC: $95,373 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetFLORENCE CRITTENTON INC: $95,373 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOPE ALLIANCE: $95,373 over 9y, 0.3% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds CROSSNORE COMMUNITIES FOR CHILDREN ↗
    • Who funds THE MASONIC HOME FOR CHILDREN AT OXFORD INC ↗
    • Who funds Boys and Girls Club of Cabarrus County Inc ↗
    • Who funds THOMPSON CHILD & FAMILY FOCUS INC ↗
    • Who funds NAZARETH CHILDREN'S HOME INC ↗
    • Who funds MASONIC AND EASTERN STAR HOME OF NORTH CAROLINA INC ↗
    • Who funds FLORENCE CRITTENTON INC ↗
    • Who funds CHILDREN'S HOPE ALLIANCE ↗

    Co-funders

    Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    The Winston-Salem FoundationNC15.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: The Winston-Salem Foundation · The Cannon Foundation Inc · Foundation for the Carolinas · Duke Energy Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

    How this is measured
    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization Vance Memorial Fund Uw funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Vance Memorial Fund Uw. Bigger dots raise more.

    2024
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
      typical government reliance, FY20–25
      How this is measured
      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

      How this is measured
      Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

      Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      Play a game based on Vance Memorial Fund Uw’s filings →

      More from the funding graph