Loading…
· Public charity
VANCE MEMORIAL FUND UW
Trust assets are invested to provide income to be distributed to the charities named in the governing document.
$83k
Granted FY2024
8
Grants
1
Communities
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
0175% classified
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.
Human Services$336kHealth$84kYouth Development$84kOther$168k
02FY2024 · 8 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
$10,330
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
- BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF CABARRUS COUNTY$10,330
- NAZARETH CHILDRENS HOME$10,330
- THE CROSSNORE SCHOOL AND CHILDRENS HOME$10,330
- MASONIC HOME FOR CHILDREN AT OXFORD$10,330
- FLORENCE CRITTENTON SERVICES INC$10,330
- MASONIC AND EASTERN STAR HOME$10,330
- CHILDRENS HOPE ALLIANCE$10,330
- THOMPSON CHILD AND FAMILY FOCUS$10,330
02The need
03
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $273k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14% — the area typically sits at 10%. 92% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$672k · 8 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else
8 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
8
0
Total granted
$672k
$0
Still filing today
100%
0%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
Human ServicesHealthYouth DevelopmentOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TCTHE CROSSNORE SCHOOL AND CHILDRENS HOME8× · 2017–2024 · $84k · revenue +4%
- TFThe Florence Crittenton Services8× · 2017–2024 · $84k · revenue +24%
Masonic Home For Children at Oxford8× · 2017–2024 · $84k · revenue +59%
Funded once
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Cunningham Childrens Home of Urbana Il
Provide therapeutic services to youth in educational, community, & residential care settings.
Human Services
2
Children's Home Society of North Carolina Inc
To promote the right of every child to a permanent, safe, and loving family.
Human Services
3
Child Care Associates
To assist family successes through excellence in comprehensive child care and development services.
—
4
Ccmh Child Care Center
Providing childcare services to the community
Human Services
5
United Children's Services of
Children's services
Human Services
6
North Carolina Partnership for
Advance a high quality, comprehensive, accountable early childhood system that benefits each child in north carolina beginning with a healthy birth.
Education
7
Children's Home Society of California
See schedule o the mission of children's home society of california is to provide children, families, and communities with supportive services to thrive.
Human Services
8
Childrens House International
Children's house international provides ethical adoption services, child focused recruitment, and family support. we support disadvantaged children with humanitarian aid in countries worldwide.
—
9
Chase Home for Children
—
10
The Wichita Children's Home
To assure the safety and well-being of children and to create heathly families by providing: assessment and intervention services; a temporary home for children at risk of abuse, neglect, or homelessness; education, prevention and advocacy…
Human Services
11
Church of God Children's Home
To provide a positive and safe living environment for hurting, abused, neglected and at-risk children placed privately and by the nc department of social services.
Human Services
12
Children's Hospital
Organization's mission to improve health outcomes for children; be a leader in creating innovative solutions to pediatric healthcare problems; and excel in care, advocacy, research. as the nation's children's hospital, the mission of…
Health
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Nazareth Childrens Home Inc and the most unlike its peers is Masonic and Eastern Star Home. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network
8 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Human Services$335,768Other$167,884Health$83,942Youth Development$83,942
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE CROSSNORE SCHOOL AND CHILDRENS HOME ↗
- Who funds The Florence Crittenton Services ↗
- Who funds Masonic Home For Children at Oxford ↗
- Who funds Thompson Children's Home ↗
- Who funds Nazareth Children's Home Inc ↗
- Who funds Cabarrus County Boys Club Inc ↗
- Who funds Masonic & Eastern Star Home ↗
- Who funds Children's Hope Alliance ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
The Winston-Salem FoundationNC15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: The Winston-Salem Foundation · The Leon Levine Foundation · Foundation for the Carolinas · Duke Energy Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation VANCE MEMORIAL FUND UW funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: The Florence Crittenton Services.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
low risk
~11 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 7 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
7 years of Form 990 filings, still active.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 560577626 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on The Florence Crittenton Services, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 11 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue grew over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 1% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Vance Memorial Fund Uw?
Find your warmest path to Vance Memorial Fund Uw through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines