How much does Usta New England Inc give?

Usta New England Inc reported 13 itemized grants totaling $174,231, out of $204,581 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 9 and 19 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.

What does Usta New England Inc fund?

By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Recreation & Sports (94%), Youth Development (3%), Human Services (2%).

Who are Usta New England Inc's largest grantees?

By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: New England Tennis and Education Foundation Inc ($152k), Maine Tennis Association Inc ($106k), Usta Connecticut Inc ($103k).

Does Usta New England Inc fund new organizations?

In FY2024, 37% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.

Which funders back the same organizations as Usta New England Inc?

Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Usta Foundation Incorporated, The Blackbaud Giving Fund, National Philanthropic Trust.

Where is Usta New England Inc based?

Usta New England Inc is based in MA.

Usta New England Inc

Usta New England Inc at a glance Mostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Usta New England Inc

Usta new england's mission is to grow tennis to inspire healthier people and communities throughout new england.

$205k

Granted FY2025still arriving

Grants FY2025still arriving

States reached

$34k

Largest

01What it funds

01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Recreation & Sports$1.8MYouth Development$56kHuman Services$30kEducation$16kCrime & Legal$5k

02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured

The 13 grants below total $174,231, the rows itemized in this filing. The $204,581 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $30,350 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

Under $10k6 grants · $45k
$10k–50k7 grants · $129k

$11,124

Median grant

States reached

$5.1M

Total assets

Largest grants
Recipient	Amount
USTA CONNECTICUT INC	$34,375
USTA EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS INC	$32,836
USTA NEW HAMPSHIRE INC	$13,396
MAINE TENNIS ASSOCIATION	$12,636
USTA VERMONT INC	$12,549
USTA WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS INC	$11,855
USTA RHODE ISLAND NJTLC	$11,124
NJTL OF BENNINGTON VT	$9,150
PROGRESO LATINO	$8,070
ALL COURT ENRICHMENT	$8,000
MAC TENNIS TRAINING CENTER INC	$7,500
SERVING STARS INC	$7,000
PINEWOODS HEALTH & RACQUET CLUB	$5,740

02The need

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $83k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

How this is measured

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

How this is measured

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.

03Its grantees

repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.

$1.9M · 24 repeat orgs$192k to everyone else

24 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$1.9M

$171k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+0%

+12%

Still filing today

50%

59%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $21k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Recreation & SportsHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentEducationHealthOther

How this is measured

First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

UE
USTA EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS INC
3× · 2023–2025 · $99k · revenue +8% · 100% of their budget
TS
THE SPORTSMEN'S TENNIS & ENRICHMENT CENTER INC
6× · 2017–2023 · $81k · revenue +273%
NO
NJTL OF BENNINGTON VT INC
2× · 2023–2025 · $34k · revenue +77%

Funded once

6I
6-Love Incorporated
one grant, 2022 · $25k
T
TEAMFAME
one grant, 2022 · $25k
TT
THE TENNIS FOUNDATION OF CONNECTICUT INC
one grant, 2017 · $15k · revenue -97%

How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

New England Senior Tennis Foundationinc

Recreation & Sports

Donkor Tennis & Education Foundation Inc

Recreation & Sports

Robinson Tennis Academy

Youth Development

Tennis for Life

Tennis for Life Foundation is dedicated to fostering mental wellness, emotional resilience, and suicide prevention through the transformative power of tennis.

Health

Vineyard Youth Tennnisinc

Recreation & Sports

Get a Grip Tennis Association Inc

Youth Development

Usta National Tennis Center Incorporated

To promote and develop the game of tennis as a means to healthful recreation and physical fitness and to operate a year-round public recreational facility.

Recreation & Sports

United States Tennis Association Incorporated

The usta mission is growing tennis to inspire healthier people and communities everywhere.usta is the national governing body for the sport of tennis and the recognized leader in promoting and developing the sport's growth on every level…

—

Crossroads Tennis Association

—

Smart Activities for Fitness and Education Safe

Youth mentoring and tennis instruction

—

The Eno Comminity Tennis Association Inc

Tennis learnring

Recreation & Sports

Patrick W Ryan Memorial Tennis Foundation Inc

Recreation & Sports

How this is measured

The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New England Tennis and Education Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Share the Magic Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

23/23

Grantees still filing

12/23

Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Other$1,536,123Recreation & Sports$402,901Human Services$83,185Youth Development$53,215Education$20,000Health$7,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Usta Foundation IncorporatedNY26× affinity10 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Usta Foundation Incorporated · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Usta New England Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Usta New England Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

12get no government money at all

5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)

1rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–25

How this is measured

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

Play a game based on Usta New England’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions

grants reported with no recipient in the public record

The regranting layer

51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer

The DAF merry-go-round

$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds

The endowment market

who holds foundation money, and what just moved

The camps

funders cluster by geography, not ideology

By state

where grant money is based, and what stays home