Skip to content
Upmc Group at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Upmc Group

Healthcare, education, and research

$190M
Granted FY2025still arriving
395
Grants FY2025still arriving
21
States reached
$176M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$909MHealth$32MHuman Services$11MHousing & Shelter$9.2MCommunity Improvement$9.0MPhilanthropy$6.9MArts & Culture$6.5MRecreation & Sports$3.1MOther$0
02FY2025 · 395 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k102 grants · $744k
  • $10k–50k235 grants · $4.4M
  • $50k–250k52 grants · $5.4M
  • $250k+6 grants · $179M
$12,500
Median grant
21
States reached
$14.5B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH$176,211,504
ROBERT MORRIS UNIVERSITY$885,000
DUQUESNE UNIVERSITY OF THE HOLY SPIRIT$747,313
UPMC ALTOONA$612,606
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$602,800
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC$267,003
PINNACLE HEALTH FOUNDATION$237,554
WHITAKER CENTER FOR SCIENCE AND ARTS$215,000
LADIES HOSPITAL AID SOCIETY$201,500
CUMBERLAND VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT$200,000
POINT PARK UNIVERSITY$200,000
JEWISH HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION PGH$200,000
ALLEGHENY CONF ON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT$200,000
THE PEYTON WALKER FOUNDATION$181,200
UNITED WAY OF VENANGO COUNTY INC$166,667
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $8.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $40k → 12%Venango County: $5.2M → 14%WESLEY HOUSE FAMILY SERVICES: $33k → 13%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $28k → 12%YMCA OF greater pittsburgh: $60k → 13%SCENIC RIVERS YMCA: $52k → 14%WESLEY HOUSE FAMILY SERVICES: $33k → 13%WESLEY FAMILY SERVICES: $30k → 13%FOUNDATION FOR ENHANCING COMMUNITIES: $124k → 12%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $25k → 14%PAXTON STREET HOME BENEVOLENT SOCIETY IN: $77k → 12%YMCA OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $132k → 11%DAUPHIN COUNTY CASA: $35k → 12%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF GREATER PGH: $55k → 11%GIVING IT FORWARD TOGETHER: $30k → 11%GIVING IT FORWARD TOGETHER: $25k → 11%MT ARARAT COMMUNITY ACTIVITY CENTER: $35k → 11%SMART FUTURES: $30k → 11%YMCA OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $138k → 11%URBAN LEAGUE OF GREATER PGH: $135k → 11%URBAN LEAGUE OF GREATER PGH: $60k → 11%URBAN LEAGUE OF GREATER PGH: $55k → 11%COMMUNITY HUMAN SERVICES CORP: $38k → 11%URBAN LEAGUE OF GREATER PGH: $36k → 11%URBAN LEAGUE OF GREATER PGH: $35k → 11%URBAN LEAGUE OF GREATER PGH: $35k → 11%URBAN LEAGUE OF GREATER PGH: $35k → 11%URBAN LEAGUE OF GREATER PGH: $35k → 11%COMMUNITY HUMAN SERVICES CORP: $35k → 11%YMCA OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $32k → 11%CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC OF THE DIOCESE: $31k → 11%CATHOLIC CHARITITES OF THE DIOCESE OF PG: $30k → 11%CATHOLIC CHARITITES OF THE DIOCESE OF PG: $30k → 11%CATHOLIC CHARITITES OF THE DIOCESE OF PG: $30k → 11%CATHOLIC CHARITITES OF THE DIOCESE OF PG: $30k → 11%YWCA GREATER PITTSBURGH: $26k → 11%CATHOLIC CHARITITES OF THE DIOCESE OF PG: $25k → 11%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF DIOCESE OF PGH: $25k → 11%URBAN LEAGUE OF GREATER PGH: $25k → 11%WESLEY FAMILY SERVICES: $30k → 11%COMMUNITY HUMAN SERVICES CORP: $35k → 11%COMMUNITY HUMAN SERVICES CORP: $34k → 11%COMMUNITY HUMAN SERVICES CORP: $34k → 11%COMMUNITY HUMAN SERVICES CORP: $32k → 11%COMMUNITY HUMAN SERVICES CORP: $30k → 11%ALLEGHENY FAMILY NETWORK: $26k → 11%2P110 CARES INC: $144k → 11%BLACK POLITICAL EMPOWERMENT PROJECT: $30k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
ID
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
IA
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
CO
MO
KY
VA
MD
DE
TN
NC
SC
DC
LA
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$975M · 409 repeat orgs$20M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +26% since the first grant, against +16% for those funded once.

409 repeat relationships: 245 still active in FY2025, 164 since wound down; 142 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

409
217

Total granted

$975M
$16M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+16%

Still filing today

78%
58%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3.7M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH
    9× · 2017–2025 · $887M · revenue +44%
  • FH
    FAMILY HOUSE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $7.9M · revenue +26%
  • DU
    DUQUESNE UNIVERSITY OF THE HOLY SPIRIT
    8× · 2017–2025 · $4.3M · revenue +29%

Funded once

  • CS
    COMMUNITY SERVICES OF VENANGO COUNTY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $5.2M · revenue +46%
  • D
    DRIVE
    one grant, 2022 · $3.5M
  • U
    UPMC
    one grant, 2017 · $1.0M
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Pittsburgh Council On Higher Education

To provide a means for sharing resources and information among members, engage in joint projects, and offer a common voice on educational matters.

Education
2
Pittsburgh Business Group On Health

An employer-led coalition that champions outcomes-based, cost-effective healthcare through education, market expertise, group purchasing, comparative data and decision support.

—
3
Monongahela Valley Hospital Inc

The mission of penn highlands mon valley is to enhance the health of the residents of the mid-monongahela valley area by providing outstanding healthcare services.

Health
4
Pittsburgh Community Broadcasting Corporation

To create and distribute trusted content, build connections and strengthen our community through public media.

Arts & Culture
5
Penn Highlands Healthcare Inc

Our community-based and controlled health care system exists to improve regional access to a wide array of premier primary care and advanced health services while supporting a reverence for life and the worth and dignity of each individual.

Health
6
Pittsburgh Venture Capital Association

The pittsburgh venture capital association was founded in 1982 to catalyze venture investment and entrepreneurialism in western pennsylvania. since then it has become the leading voice of private equity investors in the region.through a…

—
7
Pidc Development Management Corporation

Pidc dmc administers and coordinates various development projects for the city and other not-for-profit entities.

Community Improvement
8
Philadelphia Industrial Development Corporation

Pidc plans and implements economic development initiatives (see schedule o) which enhance the competitive environment, generate jobs and produce higher tax ratables throughout philadelphia.

Community Improvement
9
Pennsylvania Builders Association

Incorporated in 1945, the pennsylvania builders association is a nonprofit professional trade organization representing approximately 4,066 members from across the commonwealth. pba members include contractors, builders, and remodelers,…

—
10
Pittsburgh Mercy Health System Inc

We, pittsburgh mercy health system (pittsburgh mercy) and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. pittsburgh mercy is a member of trinity…

Health
11
Pennsylvania Academic Library Consortium Inc

To support education and research at college, university, and research libraries.

Education
12
Greater Philadelphia Tourism Marketing Corporation

Visit philadelphia is our name and our mission. as the region's official tourism marketing agency, we build greater philadelphia's image, drive visitation and boost the economy.

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Urban League of Greater Pittsburgh; the most unlike its peers is P & J Theater Works. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

577 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 577 of the 780 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

27
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
125
Early backer (in before they grew)
548/577
Grantees still filing
352/577
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $887,486,392 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH+18 more: $9,855,471 · EducationROBERT MORRIS UNIVERSITY: $6,345,000 · OtherUNITED WAY OF VENANGO COUNTY AND TITUSVILLE REGION: $3,854,975 · OtherDRIVE: $3,532,650 · OtherALLEGHENY CONFERENCE ON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: $3,476,861 · OtherUPMC: $3,063,030 · OtherCOUNTY OF ERIE: $1,333,333 · Other+82 more: $17,248,824 · OtherFAMILY HOUSE INC: $7,850,179 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc: $3,617,002 · HealthCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PITTSBURGH FOUNDATION: $3,076,347 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $1,744,685 · HealthCONTACT ALTOONA: $1,423,279 · HealthLADIES HOSPITAL AID SOCIETY OF WESTERN PA: $1,180,076 · HealthTHE JEWISH HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION OF PITTSBURGH: $1,017,000 · Health+35 more: $8,579,366 · HealthCOMMUNITY SERVICES OF VENANGO COUNTY INC: $5,180,179 · Human ServicesURBAN LEAGUE OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $450,500 · Human ServicesYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $449,700 · Human Services+17 more: $2,238,519 · Human ServicesHISTORICAL SOCIETY OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA: $2,827,071 · Arts & CultureENERGY INNOVATION CENTER INSTITUTE INC: $728,867 · Arts & CultureAFRICAN AMERICAN CULTURAL CENTER: $382,500 · Arts & CultureCARNEGIE INSTITUTE: $292,075 · Arts & CulturePITTSBURGH CULTURAL TRUST: $258,650 · Arts & CulturePITTSBURGH BALLET THEATRE INC: $222,500 · Arts & CultureWHITAKER CENTER FOR SCIENCE AND THE ARTS: $215,000 · Arts & Culture+8 more: $920,322 · Arts & CultureTHE UNITED WAY OF SOUTHWESTERN PENNSYLVANIA: $1,325,830 · PhilanthropyTHE PITTSBURGH PROMISE FOUNDATION: $1,046,000 · PhilanthropyMARIO LEMIEUX FOUNDATION: $282,854 · PhilanthropyPOISE FOUNDATION: $259,700 · PhilanthropyCRANBERRY COMMUNITY CHEST: $202,500 · PhilanthropyPEYTON WALKER FOUNDATION: $181,200 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $165,500 · Philanthropy+4 more: $356,435 · PhilanthropyERIE DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $400,000 · Community ImprovementUPTOWN PARTNERS OF PITTSBURGH: $264,000 · Community ImprovementPITTSBURGH DOWNTOWN PARTNERSHIP: $177,500 · Community ImprovementNEIGHBORING ACADEMY: $100,000 · Community ImprovementLYCOMING COUNTY FAIR ASSOCIATION: $100,000 · Community Improvement
Education$897,341,863Other$38,854,673Health$28,487,934Human Services$8,318,898Arts & Culture$5,846,985Philanthropy$3,820,019Community Improvement$1,041,500

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $887,486,392 over 9y, 5.9% of budgetFAMILY HOUSE INC: $7,850,179 over 9y, 4.2% of budgetROBERT MORRIS UNIVERSITY: $6,345,000 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetDUQUESNE UNIVERSITY OF THE HOLY SPIRIT: $4,343,765 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetUNITED WAY OF VENANGO COUNTY AND TITUSVILLE REGION: $3,854,975 over 6y, 86% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $3,617,002 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetALLEGHENY CONFERENCE ON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: $3,476,861 over 9y, 6.3% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PITTSBURGH FOUNDATION: $3,076,347 over 9y, 1.1% of budgetHISTORICAL SOCIETY OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA: $2,827,071 over 8y, 8.8% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $1,744,685 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetCONTACT ALTOONA: $1,423,279 over 3y, 17% of budgetTHE UNITED WAY OF SOUTHWESTERN PENNSYLVANIA: $1,325,830 over 7y, 2.1% of budgetPOINT PARK UNIVERSITY: $1,217,483 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetLADIES HOSPITAL AID SOCIETY OF WESTERN PA: $1,180,076 over 6y, 30% of budgetTHE PITTSBURGH PROMISE FOUNDATION: $1,046,000 over 3y, 16% of budgetTHE JEWISH HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION OF PITTSBURGH: $1,017,000 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetCHATHAM UNIVERSITY: $1,001,200 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetCARNEGIE LIBRARY OF PITTSBURGH: $859,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetPENNSYLVANIA MEDICAL SOCIETY CHARITABLE TRUST FKA FDN OF THE PA MEDICAL SOCIETY: $786,585 over 6y, 13% of budgetWESTMINSTER COLLEGE: $771,977 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetENERGY INNOVATION CENTER INSTITUTE INC: $728,867 over 6y, 15% of budgetMAGEE-WOMENS RESEARCH INSTITUTE AND FOUNDATION: $610,293 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY LIVER ALLIANCE: $567,000 over 9y, 19% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $547,850 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Diabetes Association: $488,333 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $471,801 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetURBAN LEAGUE OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $450,500 over 9y, 2.3% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $449,700 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetPERSAD CENTER INC: $405,000 over 8y, 3.7% of budgetCOMMUNITY COLLEGE OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $400,000 over 4y, 4.1% of budgetERIE DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $400,000 over 8y, 7.9% of budgetAFRICAN AMERICAN CULTURAL CENTER: $382,500 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC: $380,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCANCER BRIDGES: $365,665 over 6y, 9.7% of budgetCHUCK NOLL FOUNDATION FOR BRAIN INJURY RESEARCH: $360,000 over 7y, 8.4% of budgetGATEWAY MEDICAL SOCIETY INC: $340,450 over 6y, 45% of budgetPEOPLES OAKLAND INC: $336,235 over 9y, 6.9% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA INC: $334,005 over 9y, 1.6% of budgetNAMI KEYSTONE PENNSYLVANIA: $321,265 over 9y, 2.4% of budgetCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $314,350 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetAnimal Friends Inc: $306,600 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetSAINT VINCENT COLLEGE: $300,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetUPMC PINNACLE FOUNDATION: $296,554 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetCARNEGIE INSTITUTE: $292,075 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetSERVICE ACCESS & MANAGEMENT INC: $283,669 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMARIO LEMIEUX FOUNDATION: $282,854 over 9y, 1.0% of budgetCANTERBURY PLACE: $273,750 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH EDUCATION AND TRAINING IN ADDICTION: $265,250 over 8y, 6.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds ROBERT MORRIS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY SERVICES OF VENANGO COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds DUQUESNE UNIVERSITY OF THE HOLY SPIRIT ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF VENANGO COUNTY AND TITUSVILLE REGION ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds ALLEGHENY CONFERENCE ON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PITTSBURGH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds CONTACT ALTOONA ↗
  • Who funds THE UNITED WAY OF SOUTHWESTERN PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds POINT PARK UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds LADIES HOSPITAL AID SOCIETY OF WESTERN PA ↗
  • Who funds THE PITTSBURGH PROMISE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE JEWISH HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION OF PITTSBURGH ↗
  • Who funds CHATHAM UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds CARNEGIE LIBRARY OF PITTSBURGH ↗
  • Who funds PENNSYLVANIA MEDICAL SOCIETY CHARITABLE TRUST FKA FDN OF THE PA MEDICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds WESTMINSTER COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds ENERGY INNOVATION CENTER INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds MAGEE-WOMENS RESEARCH INSTITUTE AND FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY LIVER ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D ↗
  • Who funds American Diabetes Association ↗
  • Who funds MARCH OF DIMES INC ↗
  • Who funds URBAN LEAGUE OF GREATER PITTSBURGH ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER PITTSBURGH ↗
  • Who funds PERSAD CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY COLLEGE OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ERIE DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The United Way of Sou…The Grable FoundationRichard King Mellon F…The Heinz EndowmentsThe Pittsburgh Founda…Hillman Family Founda…The Jack Buncher Foun…Staunton Farm Foundat…Pittsburgh Penguins F…Eqt FoundationMcCune Foundation Pnc…McAuley Ministries
The United Way of Southwestern PennsylvaniaPA142.7× affinity114 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The United Way of Southwestern Pennsylvania · The Grable Foundation · Richard King Mellon Foundation · The Heinz Endowments · The Pittsburgh Foundation · Hillman Family Foundations · The Jack Buncher Foundation · Staunton Farm Foundation 540-054 Dba Staunton Farm Foundation · Pittsburgh Penguins Foundation · Eqt Foundation · McCune Foundation Pnc Bank Na · McAuley Ministries

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Upmc Group funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Upmc Group. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    50report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 780 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Upmc Group’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home