Skip to content

· Public charity

United Way of the Crossroads

To mobilize and support a united and resilient crossroads community that creates opportunities for every person to have access to a quality education that leads to a stable job, enough income to support a family through retirement, and good health.

$565k
Granted FY2024still arriving
19
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$90k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$910kHousing & Shelter$902kHuman Services$768kFood & Nutrition$662kYouth Development$446kEducation$390kCrime & Legal$273kPublic Safety & Disaster$90kOther$0
02FY2024 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k17 grants · $412k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $153k
$27,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$659k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MID-COAST FAMILY SERVICES$90,000
UNITED WAY OF CALHOUN COUNTY$63,324
MEALS ON WHEELS SOUTH TEXAS$40,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF VICTORIA$35,000
BILLY T CATTAN RECOVERY OUTREACH$32,000
PERPETUAL HELP HOME$30,000
FOOD BANK OF THE GOLDEN CRESCENT$29,000
VICTORIA ISD$29,000
GULF BEND CENTER$28,000
Individual grant recipient$27,500
HOPE OF SOUTH TEXAS$25,000
COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF THE GOLDEN CRESCENT$22,000
YMCA OF THE GOLDEN CRESCENT$21,500
COMMUNITY ACTION COMMITTEE OF VICTORIA$20,000
GOLDEN CRESCENT CASA$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $661k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%SJRC TEXAS INC: $10k → 7%MID-COAST FAMILY SERVICES: $94k → 16%MID-COAST FAMILY SERVICES: $90k → 16%MID-COAST FAMILY SERVICES: $90k → 16%MID-COAST FAMILY SERVICES: $90k → 16%MID-COAST FAMILY SERVICES: $82k → 16%MID-COAST FAMILY SERVICES: $80k → 16%MID-COAST FAMILY SERVICES: $80k → 16%MID-COAST FAMILY SERVICES: $45k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.8M · 23 repeat orgs$652k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +25% since the first grant, against -35% for those funded once.

23 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
4

Total granted

$3.8M
$550k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
-35%

Still filing today

48%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $102k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesFood & NutritionCommunity ImprovementHealthYouth DevelopmentHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MF
    MID-COAST FAMILY SERVICES
    7× · 2017–2024 · $651k · revenue +140%
  • BA
    BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF VICTORIA IN
    7× · 2017–2024 · $323k · revenue +14%
  • BT
    BILLY T CATTAN RECOVERY OUTREACH
    7× · 2017–2024 · $204k · revenue +938%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $511k
  • Y
    YMCA
    one grant, 2022 · $27k
  • RC
    REFUGIO COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2018 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Central Texas Children's Home

To provide family services and to provide residential child care for dependent children where there is a need to assist children and families disrupted by problems.

Human Services
2
Texas Foster Care & Adoption Serv

A state of texas licensed foster care and adoption agency that identifies and provides approved healing foster homes for children.

Human Services
3
Casa of Williamson County Texas

CASA of Williamson County, TX exists to empower community volunteers to advocate for children who have experienced abuse or neglect to find loving, safe, and permanent homes.

Crime & Legal
4
Guadalupe County Children's Advocacy Center

To advocate for and provide services to children and families when there are allegations of abuse and neglect throughout the investigation,prosecution, treatment, and prevention of child abuse, and to reduce the trauma to childrent with…

Crime & Legal
5
Community Action Committee of Victoria Texas

Community Action Committee of Victoria, Texas along with a community partnership helps people living in poverty to meet their most basic and critical needs while improving their ability to become self-sufficient.

Human Services
6
Victoria County Long-Term Recovery Group

The primary purpose of the organization is to establish and maintain a network within and on behalf of the faith based, non-profit, government, business, volunteers, and other organizations and agencies which will provided coordinated long…

Public Safety & Disaster
7
Court Appointed Special Advocates of Hidalgo Count

To provide services for the protection of abused and neglected children that are in the custody of the State of Texas.

Civil Rights
8
Christian Cupboard Inc

Provide no-cost nutritional assistance for adults and children in seguin and guadalupe county, texas

Human Services
9
Casa of South Texas Inc

Child Advocacy

Human Services
10
Shelter Agencies for Families in East Texas

To provide shelter to abused families.

Human Services
11
Child Care Council of Greater Houst

Provide and promote high standards of quality child care.

—
12
How Center

The H.O.W. Center provides a safe and structured living environment for individuals recovering from alcoholism and addiction while they gain the skills they need to live independently and successfully.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Meals On Wheels South Texas; the most unlike its peers is Refugio County Community Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/15
Grantees still filing
8/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $511,324 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF VICTORIA IN: $322,500 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF VICTORIA INIndividual grant recipient: $194,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientGOLDEN CRESCENT HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $175,000 · OtherGOLDEN CRESCENT HABITAT FOR HUMANITYGOLDEN CRESCENT CASA: $164,900 · OtherGOLDEN CRESCENT CASAYMCA OF THE GOLDEN CRESCENT: $160,950 · OtherYMCA OF THE GOLDEN CRESCENTHOPE OF SOUTH TEXAS INC: $160,000 · OtherHOPE OF SOUTH TEXAS INCCOMMUNITY ACTION COMMITTEE OF VICTORIA: $149,500 · OtherCOMMUNITY ACTION COMMITTEE OF VICTORIACOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF THE GOLDEN CRESCENT: $148,000 · OtherCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF THE GOLDEN CRESCENTVICTORIA COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS: $139,000 · OtherVICTORIA COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENSVICTORIA MEALS ON WHEELSSENIOR CITIZENS: $112,762 · OtherVICTORIA CHRISTIAN ASSISTANCE MINISTRIES: $92,000 · Other+6 more: $274,300 · Other+6 moreMID-COAST FAMILY SERVICES: $651,000 · Human ServicesMID-COAST FAMILY SERVICESPERPETUAL HELP HOME INC: $272,500 · Human ServicesPERPETUAL HELP HOME INCVICTORIA CHRISTIAN ASSISTANCE MINISTRY: $124,000 · Human ServicesVICTORIA CHRISTIAN ASSISTA…+1 more: $10,000 · Human ServicesTHE COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF VICTORIA DBA FOOD BANK OF THE GOLDEN CRESCENT: $179,200 · Food & NutritionMEALS ON WHEELS SOUTH TEXAS: $115,000 · Food & NutritionBILLY T CATTAN RECOVERY OUTREACH: $204,200 · HealthBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF CUERO INC: $123,000 · Youth DevelopmentHOUSING AND COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $65,000 · Housing & ShelterUNITED WAY OF CALHOUN COUNTY: $63,324 · PhilanthropyVICTORIA ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $29,000 · Community ImprovementREFUGIO COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $6,000 · Community Improvement
Other$2,604,736Human Services$1,057,500Food & Nutrition$294,200Health$204,200Youth Development$123,000Housing & Shelter$65,000Philanthropy$63,324Community Improvement$35,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMID-COAST FAMILY SERVICES: $651,000 over 7y, 3.5% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF VICTORIA IN: $322,500 over 7y, 16% of budgetPERPETUAL HELP HOME INC: $272,500 over 7y, 22% of budgetBILLY T CATTAN RECOVERY OUTREACH: $204,200 over 7y, 7.1% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF VICTORIA DBA FOOD BANK OF THE GOLDEN CRESCENT: $179,200 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetGOLDEN CRESCENT HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $175,000 over 7y, 3.0% of budgetHOPE OF SOUTH TEXAS INC: $160,000 over 7y, 3.6% of budgetVICTORIA CHRISTIAN ASSISTANCE MINISTRY: $124,000 over 3y, 5.7% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF CUERO INC: $123,000 over 7y, 10.0% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS SOUTH TEXAS: $115,000 over 3y, 4.3% of budgetHOUSING AND COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $65,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED WAY OF CALHOUN COUNTY: $63,324 over 1y, 15% of budgetVICTORIA ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $29,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetSJRC TEXAS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREFUGIO COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MID-COAST FAMILY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF VICTORIA IN ↗
  • Who funds PERPETUAL HELP HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds BILLY T CATTAN RECOVERY OUTREACH ↗
  • Who funds THE COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF VICTORIA DBA FOOD BANK OF THE GOLDEN CRESCENT ↗
  • Who funds GOLDEN CRESCENT HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗
  • Who funds HOPE OF SOUTH TEXAS INC ↗
  • Who funds VICTORIA CHRISTIAN ASSISTANCE MINISTRY ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF CUERO INC ↗
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS SOUTH TEXAS ↗
  • Who funds HOUSING AND COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF CALHOUN COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds VICTORIA ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SJRC TEXAS INC ↗
  • Who funds REFUGIO COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Kathryn O'Connor FoundationTX26.4× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Kathryn O'Connor Foundation · Wood Family Memorial Trust · Dick Albert & Mary Charitable Tr · York Albert E & Myrtle Gunn Trust · The O'Connor & Hewitt Foundation · Crossroads Foundation Crossroads Foundation · Texas Mutual Insurance Company · Greater Houston Community Foundation · United Way of the Coastal Bend Inc · Enterprise Community Partners Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization United Way of the Crossroads funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from United Way of the Crossroads. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on United Way of the Crossroads’ filings →

    More from the funding graph