Skip to content
United Way of San Joaquin County at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

United Way of San Joaquin County

To improve the lives of people by mobilizing the caring power of communities.

$239k
Granted FY2024still arriving
16
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$33k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0183% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$1.5MHuman Services$150kCommunity Improvement$40kArts & Culture$27kYouth Development$15kEducation$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 16 grants below total $205,430, the rows itemized in this filing. The $238,635 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $33,205 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k8 grants · $40k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $165k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$4.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$32,682
Individual grant recipient$30,000
FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER$20,000
CHILD ABUSE PREVENTION COUNCIL$20,000
Individual grant recipient$20,000
PREVAIL$20,000
Individual grant recipient$12,748
STOCKTONIA NEWS GROUP$10,000
LITTLE MANILA$5,000
SJC HISPANIC CHAMBER OF COMMERCE$5,000
AFRICAN AMERICAN CHAMBER OF SAN JOAQUIN FOUNDATION$5,000
STANISLAUS STATE FOUNDATION$5,000
THE AMELIA ANN ADAMS$5,000
REINVENT STOCKTON$5,000
CENTRAL VALLEY ASIAN AMERICAN CHAMBER$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–24, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%PREVAIL: $20k → 12%EL CONCILIO: $5k → 12%SOW A SEED COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

48%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$167k · 5 repeat orgs$182k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +6% since the first grant, against -3% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
8

Total granted

$167k
$42k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+6%
-3%

Still filing today

80%
88%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 32% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $140k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24
Community ImprovementHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FR
    FAMILY RESOURCE & REFERRAL CENTER OF SAN JOAQUIN
    3× · 2022–2024 · $84k · revenue +89%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2023–2024 · $47k
  • REINVENT STOCKTON FOUNDATION
    2× · 2023–2024 · $15k · revenue +6%

Funded once

  • TP
    TOKAY PRESS INC
    one grant, 2023 · $7k
  • TC
    The Chest of Hope Inc
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue 0%
  • SA
    SOW A SEED COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue -67%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Casa of Solano County

Advocates for abused, neglected and other identified children within the court system, with the belief that every child is entitled to a safe and stable home.

Civil Rights
2
Family Promise of San Joaquin County

To help reduce homelessness and support low income families in san joaquin county to achieve sustainable independence through a community-based response.

Human Services
3
Central Valley Gender Health & Wellness
Civil Rights
4
Solano Affordable Housing Foundation
Housing & Shelter
5
California School-Age Consortium Inc

The California School-Age Consortium (CalSAC) builds professional networks that provide training, leadership development and advocacy to ensure that all young people have access to high quality out-of-school time programs and to create a…

—
6
Central Valley Partnership

The Central Valley Partnership (CVP) conducts and collaborates in training initiatives, including community organizer training, education on labor history and issues, messaging workshops, etc., aimed at fostering the establishment of new…

Civil Rights
7
San Joaquin Partnership Inc

The organization's purpose is to promote san joaquin county and facilitate the creation of jobs within the county through its activities.

—
8
Cultiva La Salud

Cultiva La Salud is dedicated to creating health equity in the San Joaquin Valley by fostering changes in communities that support healthy eating and active living. Cultiva La Salud is among a growing number of programs in the nation who…

Health
9
Court Appointed Special Advocates

The Sonoma County Court Appointed Special Advocates (CASA) Program serves abused and neglected children coming before the Juvenile Court of Protection and Rehabilitation Services.

Civil Rights
10
Community Impact Central Valley

To deliver comprehensive health and human service programs that improve the health and well-being of under-served california residents.

Health
11
Childrens Network of Solano County

Improve the lives of children in solano county through education, advocacy, coordination of community services and community-based collaboratives. children's network of solano county conducts and disseminates research, offers training,…

Human Services
12
California Asian Pacific Chamber of Commerce

To advance statewide economic development strategies through public and private partnerships, strong advocacy efforts and by providing resources in our local communities through a network of community-based organizations dedicated to…

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is El Concilio California; the most unlike its peers is Central Valley Asian-American. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
9/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FAMILY RESOURCE & REFERRAL CENTER OF SAN JOAQUIN: $84,337 · OtherFAMILY RESOURCE & REFERRAL CENTER OF SAN JOAQUINIndividual grant recipient: $47,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $32,682 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSAN JOAQUIN COUNTY CHILD ABUSE PREVENTION COUNCIL: $20,000 · OtherSAN JOAQUIN COUNTY CHILD ABUSE PREVENTION COUNCILIndividual grant recipient: $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $12,748 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSTOCKTONIA NEWS GROUP INC: $10,000 · Other+2 more: $11,760 · OtherPREVAIL CA: $20,000 · Human ServicesPREVAIL CAAMELIA ANN ADAMS WHOLE LIFE CENTER: $10,495 · Human ServicesAMELIA ANN AD…SOW A SEED COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Human ServicesSOW A SEED CO…EL CONCILIO CALIFORNIA: $5,000 · Human ServicesEL CONCILIO C…REINVENT STOCKTON FOUNDATION: $15,000 · Community ImprovementREINVENT ST…Central Valley Asian-American: $5,000 · Community ImprovementCentral Val…SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY HISPANIC CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $5,000 · Community ImprovementSAN JOAQUIN…Community Partnership for Families of San Joaquin: $5,000 · Community ImprovementCommunity P…COMMUNITY PARTNERS: $5,000 · Community ImprovementCOMMUNITY P…LITTLE MANILA RISING: $10,000 · Arts & CultureThe Chest of Hope Inc: $5,000 · Housing & ShelterASIAN PACIFIC SELF-DEVELOPMENT: $5,000 · Housing & ShelterAFRICAN AMERICAN CHAMBER OF SAN JOAQUIN FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentLODI BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB INC: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY STANISLAUS FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Education
Other$238,527Human Services$40,495Community Improvement$35,000Arts & Culture$10,000Housing & Shelter$10,000Youth Development$10,000Education$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFAMILY RESOURCE & REFERRAL CENTER OF SAN JOAQUIN: $84,337 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPREVAIL CA: $20,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSAN JOAQUIN COUNTY CHILD ABUSE PREVENTION COUNCIL: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetREINVENT STOCKTON FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAMELIA ANN ADAMS WHOLE LIFE CENTER: $10,495 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetLITTLE MANILA RISING: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCentral Valley Asian-American: $5,000 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetThe Chest of Hope Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetAFRICAN AMERICAN CHAMBER OF SAN JOAQUIN FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetSAN JOAQUIN COUNTY HISPANIC CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $5,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetLODI BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSOW A SEED COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY STANISLAUS FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCommunity Partnership for Families of San Joaquin: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY PARTNERS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetASIAN PACIFIC SELF-DEVELOPMENT: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTRACY INTERFAITH MINISTRIES: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetEL CONCILIO CALIFORNIA: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Kaiser Foundation Hos…Sunlight GivingSierra Health Foundat…The California Endowm…Port City Operating C…Reinvent Stockton Fou…The 54 FundThe Antone and Marie …Sutter Valley Hospita…Tides CenterSilicon Valley Commun…Network for Good
Kaiser Foundation HospitalsCA20.2× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Sunlight Giving · Sierra Health Foundation Center for Health Program Management · The California Endowment · Port City Operating Company LLC · Reinvent Stockton Foundation · The 54 Fund · The Antone and Marie Raymus Foundation · Sutter Valley Hospitals · Tides Center · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Network for Good

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization United Way of San Joaquin County funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from United Way of San Joaquin County. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2024, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on United Way of San Joaquin County’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home