· Public charity
United Way of San Joaquin County
To improve the lives of people by mobilizing the caring power of communities.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 16 grants below total $205,430 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $238,635 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $33,205 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k8 grants · $40k
- $10k–50k8 grants · $165k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Individual grant recipient | $32,682 |
| Individual grant recipient | $30,000 |
| FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER | $20,000 |
| CHILD ABUSE PREVENTION COUNCIL | $20,000 |
| PREVAIL | $20,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $20,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $12,748 |
| STOCKTONIA NEWS GROUP | $10,000 |
| THE AMELIA ANN ADAMS | $5,000 |
| AFRICAN AMERICAN CHAMBER OF SAN JOAQUIN FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| SJC HISPANIC CHAMBER OF COMMERCE | $5,000 |
| REINVENT STOCKTON | $5,000 |
| STANISLAUS STATE FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| CENTRAL VALLEY ASIAN AMERICAN CHAMBER | $5,000 |
| LITTLE MANILA | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–24, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +6% since the first grant, against -3% for the ones you funded once.
5 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 32% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $140k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FRFAMILY RESOURCE & REFERRAL CENTER OF SAN JOAQUIN3× · 2022–2024 · $84k · revenue +89%
- IGIndividual grant recipient2× · 2023–2024 · $47k
REINVENT STOCKTON FOUNDATION2× · 2023–2024 · $15k · revenue +6%
Funded once
- TPTOKAY PRESS INCone grant, 2023 · $7k
- SASOW A SEED COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONone grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue -67%
- TCThe Chest of Hope Incone grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue 0%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Advocates for abused, neglected and other identified children within the court system, with the belief that every child is entitled to a safe and stable home.
Our mission is to join diverse people, ideas, and resources to address the most pressing social and environmental justice priorities. We believe that the community concerns of Californias San Joaquin Valley (SJV) can only be addressed if…
Cultiva La Salud is dedicated to creating health equity in the San Joaquin Valley by fostering changes in communities that support healthy eating and active living. Cultiva La Salud is among a growing number of programs in the nation who…
To help reduce homelessness and support low income families in san joaquin county to achieve sustainable independence through a community-based response.
Resources and Community Advocacy. Serving low income youth and families in the community. Providing culturally competent and sensitivie programing based on based on the needs and resources available in Santa Clara County.
The California School-Age Consortium (CalSAC) builds professional networks that provide training, leadership development and advocacy to ensure that all young people have access to high quality out-of-school time programs and to create a…
The Central Valley Partnership (CVP) conducts and collaborates in training initiatives, including community organizer training, education on labor history and issues, messaging workshops, etc., aimed at fostering the establishment of new…
The organization's purpose is to promote san joaquin county and facilitate the creation of jobs within the county through its activities.
Improve the lives of children in solano county through education, advocacy, coordination of community services and community-based collaboratives. children's network of solano county conducts and disseminates research, offers training,…
The Sonoma County Court Appointed Special Advocates (CASA) Program serves abused and neglected children coming before the Juvenile Court of Protection and Rehabilitation Services.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is El Concilio California and the most unlike its peers is Central Valley Asian-American. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FAMILY RESOURCE & REFERRAL CENTER OF SAN JOAQUIN ↗
- Who funds PREVAIL CA ↗
- Who funds SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY CHILD ABUSE PREVENTION COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds REINVENT STOCKTON FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds AMELIA ANN ADAMS WHOLE LIFE CENTER ↗
- Who funds LITTLE MANILA RISING ↗
- Who funds SOW A SEED COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds The Chest of Hope Inc ↗
- Who funds AFRICAN AMERICAN CHAMBER OF SAN JOAQUIN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY HISPANIC CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗
- Who funds LODI BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB INC ↗
- Who funds Central Valley Asian-American ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY STANISLAUS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Community Partnership for Families of San Joaquin ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY PARTNERS ↗
- Who funds ASIAN PACIFIC SELF-DEVELOPMENT ↗
- Who funds TRACY INTERFAITH MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds EL CONCILIO CALIFORNIA ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Sunlight Giving · Sierra Health Foundation Center for Health Program Management · The California Endowment · Port City Operating Company LLC · Reinvent Stockton Foundation · The 54 Fund · The Antone and Marie Raymus Foundation · Sutter Valley Hospitals · Tides Center · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Network for Good
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization United Way of San Joaquin County funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.