How much did UNITED WAY OF SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 92% of UNITED WAY OF SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k8 grants · $40k
$10k–50k8 grants · $165k

$10,000

Median grant

States reached

$3.9M

Total assets

Largest grants

PORT CITY MARKETING$32,682
UNIVISION COMMUNICATION$30,000
PREVAIL$20,000
CCN - HEALTHFORCE$20,000
FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER$20,000
CHILD ABUSE PREVENTION COUNCIL$20,000
LAMAR COMPANIES$12,748
STOCKTONIA NEWS GROUP$10,000
CENTRAL VALLEY ASIAN AMERICAN CHAMBER$5,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB - LODI$5,000
THE AMELIA ANN ADAMS$5,000
REINVENT STOCKTON$5,000
SJC HISPANIC CHAMBER OF COMMERCE$5,000
LITTLE MANILA$5,000
AFRICAN AMERICAN CHAMBER OF SAN JOAQUIN FOUNDATION$5,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–24, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12% — the area typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$1.2M · 6 repeat orgs$182k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +838% since the first grant, against +160% for the ones you funded once.

6 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$1.2M

$42k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+838%

+160%

Still filing today

67%

88%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 32% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $140k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Community ImprovementHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

FR
FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER
3× · 2022–2024 · $84k · revenue +66%
REINVENT STOCKTON
2× · 2023–2024 · $15k · revenue +72%
TA
THE AMELIA ANN ADAMS WHOLE LIFE CENTER
2× · 2023–2024 · $10k · revenue +1411%

Funded once

TP
TOKAY PRESS INC
one grant, 2023 · $7k
CO
CHEST OF HOPEgraduated
one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +1862%
EC
EL CONCILIOgraduated
one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +55%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Community Initiatives for Collective Impact

Our mission is to join diverse people, ideas, and resources to address the most pressing social and environmental justice priorities. We believe that the community concerns of Californias San Joaquin Valley (SJV) can only be addressed if…

Community Improvement

Sacramento Metropolitan Chamber of

The Sacramento Metropolitan Chamber of Commerce advocates for and supports economic success of its members and the six-county capital region by leading the effort to grow and retain business.

—

Sacramento Hispanic Chamber of Commerce

Our mission is to strengthen the regions business community by providing education, technical assistance, access to capital, procurement facilitation and workforce development training.

Community Improvement

Center for Community Advocacy

Identify, cultivate, and recognize leadership from farmworkers and low-income families to expand opportunities in their lives.

—

California Hispanic Chambers of Commerce

To promote hispanic business, create an atmosphere that encourages the growth of the hispanic business community and to act as an advocate for the hispanic business community.

—

San Joaquin Community Foundation Inc

To provide leadership, promote a culture of giving & create resources that address the needs of san joaquin county.

Philanthropy

Solano Community Foundation

The Solano Community Foundation strengthens Solano County by advancing equity, supporting nonprofit resilience, and expanding access to philanthropy. We serve as a community leader, responsive grantmaker, and trusted partner for donors who…

Philanthropy

California Competes

California Competes: Higher Education for a Strong Economy is a nonpartisan policy and research organization focused on identifying solutions to the states most critical challenges at the intersection of higher education, equity, and the…

Education

Southwest Fresno Development Corporation

To lift up and restore pride in the sw fresno community through providing pathways to entrepreneurship and homeownership, creating safer, cleaner, and vibrant neighborhoods where residents thrive.

—

Casa of Solano County

Advocates for abused, neglected and other identified children within the court system, with the belief that every child is entitled to a safe and stable home.

Civil Rights

Arriba Juntos

To promote economic self-sufficiency for san franciscans and their families through occupational training and employment opportunities

Employment

Sacramento Asian Pacific

To create a positive environment for local business, government, educational institutions and trade. to promote, nuture and propel economic growth in the region.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is El Concilio California and the most unlike its peers is Central Valley Asian-American. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

18 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

18/18

Grantees still filing

17/18

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$1,223,845Human Services$40,495Community Improvement$35,000Arts & Culture$10,000Housing & Shelter$10,000Youth Development$10,000Education$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Kaiser Foundation HospitalsCA20.3× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Sierra Health Foundation · Port City Operating Company LLC · Reinvent Stockton Foundation · The 54 Fund · Sunlight Giving · Sutter Valley Hospitals · Tides Center · The California Endowment · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation UNITED WAY OF SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: CENTRAL VALLEY ASIAN AMERICAN CHAMBER.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

low risk

7 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 3.7× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 680453141 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on CENTRAL VALLEY ASIAN AMERICAN CHAMBER, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 5% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to United Way of San Joaquin County?

Find your warmest path to United Way of San Joaquin County through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

UNITED WAY OF SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

18 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to United Way of San Joaquin County?

More from the funding graph

UNITED WAY OF SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

18 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to United Way of San Joaquin County?

More from the funding graph