Skip to content
United Way of Northern Utah at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

United Way of Northern Utah

We unite people and organizations to build a healthy, stable, and well-educated community.

$29k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$2.4MEducation$1.6MHuman Services$1.6MHealth$1.5MCrime & Legal$466kHousing & Shelter$120kYouth Development$88kReligion$87kOther$0
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 1 grants below total $10,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $29,230 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $19,230 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$6.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNITED WAY OF SALT LAKE$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $275k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%UNITED WAY OF GREATER SALT LA: $50k → 8%COTTAGES OF HOPE: $41k → 9%UNITED WAY OF GREATER SALT LA: $9k → 8%BOX ELDER FAMILY SUPPORT CTR: $13k → 8%UNITED WAY OF GREATER SALT LA: $8k → 8%BOX ELDER FAMILY SUPPORT CTR: $13k → 8%YOUR COMMUNITY CONNECTION: $25k → 9%YOUR COMMUNITY CONNECTION: $19k → 9%COTTAGES OF HOPE: $17k → 9%PEOPLE HELPING PEOPLE: $5k → 8%FAMILY PROMISE OF OGDEN: $10k → 9%YCC FAMILY CRISIS CENTER: $10k → 9%FAMILY PROMISE OF OGDEN: $7k → 9%FAMILY COUNSELING SERVICE: $6k → 9%FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER OF OGDE: $10k → 9%CENTER FOR GRIEVING CHILDREN: $9k → 9%FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER OF OGDE: $6k → 9%A CENTER FOR GREIVING CHILDREN: $6k → 9%FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER OF OGDE: $6k → 9%CENTER FOR GRIEVING CHILDREN: $5k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

46%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.8M · 29 repeat orgs$4.4M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +89% since the first grant, against +35% for those funded once.

29 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 28 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
36

Total granted

$3.8M
$4.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+89%
+35%

Still filing today

76%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’22’23’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’22’23’25
Human ServicesPhilanthropyHealthEducationYouth DevelopmentHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CO
    Cottages of Hope Inc
    3× · 2017–2020 · $125k · revenue +89%
  • SA
    ST ANNE'S CENTER
    4× · 2017–2023 · $71k · revenue +12%
  • CS
    CHILDREN'S SERVICE SOCIETY OF UTAH
    3× · 2017–2020 · $67k · revenue +117%

Funded once

  • US
    UTAH STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION
    one grant, 2020 · $2.2M
  • AF
    Association for Utah Community Health
    one grant, 2022 · $917k · revenue -22%
  • DF
    DANIELS FUNDgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $380k · revenue +89%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Utah Geological Foundation
—
2
Ogden Family Foundation
Education
3
Autism Foundation of Utah
Health
4
Utah Shakespeare Festival Foundation
Arts & Culture
5
Northern Utah Cancer Foundation
—
6
Family Promise - Salt Lake

We help families experiencing homelessness find lasting independence and security.

Housing & Shelter
7
House of Hope

Treating substance use disorders, rebuilding lives, strengthening families, and empowering women.

—
8
Utah Association of Family Support Centers Inc

The mission of the fscu is to strengthen utah families one community at a time by supporting parents, protecting children, and preserving families. to accomplish this mission, each family support center provides its clients with a 24-hour…

—
9
Economic Development Corporation of Utah Foundation

To serve as a catalyst for quality job growth and increased capital investment in the state.

Community Improvement
10
Utah Motorsports Foundation
Philanthropy
11
Utah Public Lands Alliance
Education
12
University of Utah Foundation

Provide support to the University of Utah Growth Capital Partners Foundation in Charitable, Educational and Scientific purposes.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ycc Family Crisis Center; the most unlike its peers is Lawrence & Janet Dee Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

46 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 46 of the 65 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
20
Early backer (in before they grew)
44/46
Grantees still filing
34/46
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UTAH STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION: $2,224,497 · OtherUTAH STATE BOARD OF EDUCATIONOGDEN CITY - CARES GRANTS: $900,981 · OtherOGDEN CITY - CARES GRANTSSOUTHWEST BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CENTER: $150,812 · Other+35 more: $934,568 · Other+35 moreUTAH'S PROMISE: $1,921,007 · PhilanthropyUTAH'S PROMISEDANIELS FUND: $380,000 · PhilanthropyDANIELS FUND+5 more: $83,143 · PhilanthropyAssociation for Utah Community Health: $917,321 · HealthAssociation for …SOUTHWEST UTAH COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER: $188,942 · HealthSOUTHWEST UTAH C…+4 more: $45,443 · HealthCottages of Hope Inc: $124,620 · Human ServicesYCC FAMILY CRISIS CENTER: $54,107 · Human ServicesBOX ELDER FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER: $25,497 · Human ServicesFAMILY SUPPORT CENTER OF OGDEN INC: $22,086 · Human ServicesTHE FAMILY SUMMIT FOUNDATION: $20,420 · Human ServicesFAMILY PROMISE OF OGDEN: $17,014 · Human Services+2 more: $11,620 · Human ServicesBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF WEBER-DAVIS: $39,165 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF NORTHERN UTAH: $9,500 · Youth DevelopmentBig Brothers Big Sisters of Utah: $10,915 · EducationP & G SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION: $10,000 · EducationOGDEN SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $7,377 · EducationHOMELESS VETERANS FELLOWSHIP: $21,984 · Housing & Shelter
Other$4,210,858Philanthropy$2,384,150Health$1,151,706Human Services$275,364Youth Development$48,665Education$28,292Housing & Shelter$21,984

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUTAH'S PROMISE: $1,921,007 over 2y, 17% of budgetAssociation for Utah Community Health: $917,321 over 1y, 11% of budgetDANIELS FUND: $380,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSOUTHWEST UTAH COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER: $188,942 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetCottages of Hope Inc: $124,620 over 3y, 12% of budgetST ANNE'S CENTER: $70,882 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetCHILDREN'S SERVICE SOCIETY OF UTAH: $67,470 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetYCC FAMILY CRISIS CENTER: $54,107 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetBOX ELDER COMMUNITY PANTRY: $46,807 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF WEBER-DAVIS: $39,165 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetNew Hope Crisis Center of Box Elder County: $37,884 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetBOX ELDER FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER: $25,497 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF UTAH INC: $24,983 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetFAMILY SUPPORT CENTER OF OGDEN INC: $22,086 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetHOMELESS VETERANS FELLOWSHIP: $21,984 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetTHE FAMILY SUMMIT FOUNDATION: $20,420 over 3y, 22% of budgetAMERICA FIRST CREDIT UNION CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetWells Fargo Foundation: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTERMOUNTAIN HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC: $19,279 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOK Foundation: $18,143 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetENABLEUTAH INC: $17,857 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetOGDEN - WEBER TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $17,042 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF OGDEN: $17,014 over 2y, 3.6% of budgetPREVENT CHILD ABUSE UTAH: $16,071 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetSORENSON LEGACY FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRAPPER TRAILS COUNCIL - BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA 589: $13,889 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGREATER OGDEN COMMUNITY NATURE CTR: $11,562 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetBig Brothers Big Sisters of Utah: $10,915 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetYOUTH FUTURES: $10,465 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF WEBER & DAVIS COUNTIES: $10,130 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetLawrence & Janet Dee Foundation: $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF NORTHERN UTAH: $9,500 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetBox Elder School District Foundation: $7,500 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetOGDEN SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $7,377 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetFAMILY COUNSELING SERVICE OF NORTHERN UTAH INC: $6,125 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetPEOPLE HELPING PEOPLE: $5,495 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetONEIDA CRISIS CENTER INC: $5,464 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetMOUNTAIN WEST MOTHERS MILK BANK: $5,109 over 1y, 6.7% of budgetWEBER PATHWAYS: $5,074 over 1y, 0.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

George S and Dolores …Sorenson Legacy Found…Lawrence & Janet Dee …Ihc Health Services I…Pacificorp Foundation…The Community Foundat…Intermountain Communi…Larry H Miller and Ga…Dr Wc Swanson Family …Dominion Energy Chari…Willard L Eccles Char…Ralph Nye Charitable …
George S and Dolores Dore Eccles FoundationUT41.5× affinity18 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: George S and Dolores Dore Eccles Foundation · Sorenson Legacy Foundation · Lawrence & Janet Dee Foundation · Ihc Health Services Inc · Pacificorp Foundation Aka Pacific Power Foundation Aka Rocky Mountain Power Foundati · The Community Foundation of Utah · Intermountain Community Care Foundation Inc · Larry H Miller and Gail Miller Family Foundation · Dr Wc Swanson Family Foundation · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · Willard L Eccles Charitable Foundation · Ralph Nye Charitable Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization United Way of Northern Utah funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from United Way of Northern Utah. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 65 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on United Way of Northern Utah’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home