· Public charity
United Way of Lackawanna Wayne and Pike Counties
To improve the quality of life of the people of lackawanna, wayne and pike counties and surrounding communities by serving as a catalyst for community problem solving and by conducting an efficient, encompassing volunteer fundraising effort to positively impact the community's most compelling social problems.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 55% of UNITED WAY OF LACKAWANNA WAYNE AND PIKE COUNTIES’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 42 grants below total $2,115,237 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $2,667,166 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $551,929 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k4 grants · $29k
- $10k–50k18 grants · $370k
- $50k–250k20 grants · $1.7M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UNITED NEIGHBORHOOD CENTERS OF LACKAWANNA COUNTY | $218,082 |
| NEIGHBORWORKS NORTHEASTERN PA | $110,708 |
| JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER | $107,521 |
| WOMENS RESOURCE CENTER - DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SHELTER | $106,364 |
| ST JOSEPH'S CENTER | $101,333 |
| UNITED CEREBRAL PALSY OF NORTHEAST PA | $98,912 |
| CATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES INC | $81,131 |
| OUTREACH CENTER FOR COMMUNITY RESOURCES | $80,083 |
| YMCA - GREATER SCRANTON | $79,702 |
| THE ARC OF NORTHEASTERN PA | $78,250 |
| FRIENDS OF THE POOR | $77,839 |
| BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF NEPA | $73,694 |
| TRIBORO CHRISTIAN ACADEMY | $72,490 |
| MEALS ON WHEELS OF NEPA | $72,080 |
| COMMISSION ON ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY OF LUZERNE COUNTY | $70,425 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $5.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +46% since the first grant, against +24% for the ones you funded once.
53 repeat relationships — 35 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $214k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- WIWRC INC9× · 2017–2025 · $860k · revenue +100%
- BGBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF NORTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA9× · 2017–2025 · $767k · revenue +5%
- SJST JOSEPHS CENTER9× · 2017–2025 · $716k · revenue +59%
Funded once
- ASALLIED SERVICES INSTITUTE OF REHABILITATION MEDICINEone grant, 2017 · $32k · revenue -14%
- SSST STANISLAUS POLISH NATIONAL CATHOLIC CHURCHone grant, 2017 · $29k
- BHBRIGHT HORIZON FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $20k · revenue +45%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide affordable housing to people of lackawanna county
Working in partnership with local social service agencies, UCSWF connects Berks county families with community resources, education and career development.
The child development council of northeastern pa, inc. was established to provide child care and nutritional services to working families.
Services to challenged individuals in Vocational,Residential, Home Based, and Community settings.
Providing administrative services to its two subsidiaries, keystone hospice and keystone home health, llc. providing social services to medically fragile populations in southeastern pennsylvania.
Ucp of central pennsylvania empowers people of diverse abilities to live meaningful life through innovative support and services.
To provide companion services to individuals with special needs.
Wrc pennsylvania memorial home's mission is to provide choices for generations. built on a not-for-profit foundation of caring, the organization offers residential and personal care, home and community-based services, skilled and…
The center for community action is the designated lead poverty agency for blair, bedford, fulton, and huntingdon counties in central pennsylvania and exists to provide a broad spectrum of services to the low income residents of the…
Schuylkill community action is a private, nonprofit corporationincorporated under the laws of the commonwealth of pennsylvania. theprimary purpose of schuylkill community action is to coordinate andfocus all available resources upon the…
Provide services to meet the needs of senior citizens of Jefferson County, Pennsylvania
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Wyoming Valley and the most unlike its peers is Bright Horizon Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 52 years old; the field is 22. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 16% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
47 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 47 of the 70 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES OF THE DIOCESE OF SCRANTON INC ↗
- Who funds WRC INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF NORTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA ↗
- Who funds ST JOSEPHS CENTER ↗
- Who funds Young Men's Christian Association of Greater Scranton ↗
- Who funds THE ARC OF NORTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA ↗
- Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SCRANTON ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF NORTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA ↗
- Who funds DAY NURSERY ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds UPPER VALLEY YMCA ↗
- Who funds LACKAWANNA BLIND ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds SCRANTON PRIMARY HEALTH CARE CENTER ↗
- Who funds UNITED CEREBRAL PALSY OF NEPA ↗
- Who funds SUMMIT ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS OF NORTHEASTERN PA INC ↗
- Who funds SCRANTON NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds TELESPOND SENIOR SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds NORTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF WYOMING VALLEY ↗
- Who funds DISCOVERY MULTIPLE INTELLIGENCES PRESCHOOL ↗
- Who funds THE DOLLYWOOD FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ALLIED HEALTH CARE SERVICES ↗
- Who funds OUTREACH - CENTER FOR COMMUNITY RESOURCES ↗
- Who funds NORTH POCONO PRESCHOOL ↗
- Who funds COMMISSION ON ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY OF LUZERNE COUNTY ↗
- Who funds SERVING SENIORS INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE POOR ↗
- Who funds VOLUNTARY ACTION CENTER ↗
- Who funds University of Scranton ↗
- Who funds Wayne County YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Scranton Area Foundation Inc · Moses Taylor Foundation Inc · Allone Charities · The Hawk Family Foundation · Allone Foundation · The Harry and Jeanette Weinberg Foundation Inc · Robert H Spitz Foundation · William G McGowan Charitable Fund · Walter L Schautz Foundation · Margaret Briggs Foundation · Ppl Foundation · Community Services for Children Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization United Way of Lackawanna Wayne and Pike Counties funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.