Skip to content

· Public charity

United Way of Greater Texarkana Inc

Provide annual support to 501(c) (3) member agencies through contributions received from the public.

$507k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$67k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$1.1MHealth$888kEmployment$569kFood & Nutrition$533kHousing & Shelter$400kCrime & Legal$324kEducation$223kArts & Culture$189kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 18 grants below total $490,063, the rows itemized in this filing. The $507,330 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $17,267 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k13 grants · $337k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $131k
$21,120
Median grant
2
States reached
$3.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OPPORTUNITIES INC$67,056
RESOURCES FOR THE DISABLED$63,700
TEMPLE MEMORIAL PEDIATRIC CEN$41,184
RANDY SAMS OUTREACH SHELTER$39,360
RUNNIN W J RANCH$38,400
SENIOR CITIZENS SERVICES$33,870
NORTHEAST TEXAS CASA INC$33,600
HARVEST TEXARKANA REGIONAL FO$29,192
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE PREVENTION INC$21,120
TRAHC Artsmart CAN$20,909
LITERACY COUNCIL OF BOWIE$20,160
TEXARKANA FRIENDSHIP CENTER$18,612
SALVATION ARMY$13,724
CADDO AREA COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS$13,440
SWACMHC Inc$13,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $1.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 16%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 16%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE PREVENTION INC: $22k → 23%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE PREVENTION INC: $22k → 23%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE PREVENTION INC: $22k → 23%OPPORTUNITIES INC: $70k → 19%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE PREVENTION INC: $21k → 23%OPPORTUNITIES INC: $70k → 19%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE PREVENTION INC: $21k → 23%OPPORTUNITIES INC: $70k → 19%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE PREVENTION INC: $21k → 23%OPPORTUNITIES INC: $67k → 19%OPPORTUNITIES INC: $67k → 19%OPPORTUNITIES INC: $67k → 19%OPPORTUNITIES INC: $67k → 19%OPPORTUNITIES INC: $67k → 19%OPPORTUNITIES INC: $67k → 19%RUNNIN W J RANCH: $41k → 19%RUNNIN W J RANCH: $40k → 19%For the Sake of One: $8k → 23%RUNNIN W J RANCH: $40k → 19%For the Sake of One: $8k → 23%For the Sake of One: $8k → 23%RUNNIN W J RANCH: $38k → 19%RUNNIN W J RANCH: $38k → 19%RUNNIN W J RANCH: $38k → 19%RUNNIN W J RANCH: $38k → 19%RUNNIN W J RANCH: $38k → 19%RUNNIN W J RANCH: $38k → 19%SENIOR CITIZENS SERVICES: $35k → 19%SENIOR CITIZENS SERVICES: $34k → 19%SENIOR CITIZENS SERVICES: $34k → 19%SENIOR CITIZENS SERVICES: $34k → 19%SENIOR CITIZENS SERVICES: $34k → 19%SENIOR CITIZENS SERVICES: $34k → 19%SENIOR CITIZENS SERVICES: $34k → 19%SENIOR CITIZENS SERVICES: $34k → 19%SENIOR CITIZENS SERVICES: $34k → 19%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE PREVENTION INC: $21k → 19%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE PREVENTION INC: $21k → 19%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE PREVENTION INC: $21k → 19%TEXARKANA FRIENDSHIP CENTER: $19k → 19%TEXARKANA FRIENDSHIP CENTER: $19k → 19%TEXARKANA FRIENDSHIP CENTER: $19k → 19%TEXARKANA FRIENDSHIP CENTER: $19k → 19%Mission Texarkana Inc: $19k → 19%TEXARKANA FRIENDSHIP CENTER: $19k → 19%TEXARKANA FRIENDSHIP CENTER: $19k → 19%TEXARKANA FRIENDSHIP CENTER: $18k → 19%TEXARKANA FRIENDSHIP CENTER: $18k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.5M · 23 repeat orgs$29k to everyone else

23 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
2

Total granted

$4.5M
$29k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+271%

Still filing today

83%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthArts & CultureEmploymentReligionCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TR
    TEXARKANA RESOURCES FOR DISABLEDIN
    9× · 2017–2025 · $569k · revenue +36%
  • RS
    Randy Sams Outreach Shelter
    9× · 2017–2025 · $357k · revenue +45%
  • SC
    Senior Citizens Services of Texarkana
    9× · 2017–2025 · $307k · revenue +8%

Funded once

  • TS
    TEXARKANA SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $22k · revenue +271%
  • SA
    SHELTER AGENCIES FOR FAMILIES IN EAST TEXAS
    one grant, 2021 · $7k · revenue -33%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Arkansas Center for Independence

Habilitation and residential services for adults with developmental disabilities

Human Services
2
Special Abilities of North Texas Inc

To provide the highest quality care, training and support to adults with special needs, giving them opportunities to succeed in life.

Human Services
3
Nacogdoches Treatment Center for Hanicapped Children and Adults Inc

Treatment of handicapped and disabled children and adults and providing job training for disabled persons. Providing activities for Alzheimer's Disease patients.

Health
4
Texoma Family Shelter

Feed and house homeless families, counsel and help them prepare for job interviews, assist in completing forms for govt assistance, and provide rent/utilities assistance. Coordinate with local food bank.

Human Services
5
Texas Foster Care & Adoption Serv

A state of texas licensed foster care and adoption agency that identifies and provides approved healing foster homes for children.

Human Services
6
Ocarc

Providing employment and job training service for mentally challenged individuals in southeast texas.

—
7
Austin Travis County Mhmr Center Dba Integral Care

Atcic's mission is to improve the lives of people affected by behavioral health and developmental and/or intellectual challenges.

Health
8
Central Texas Children's Home

To provide family services and to provide residential child care for dependent children where there is a need to assist children and families disrupted by problems.

Human Services
9
Grace House Texarkana Inc

Grace House exists to rescue and advocate for women and families at risk.

Housing & Shelter
10
Texas Reach Out Inc

Provides housing and spiritual development for Christians reintegrating into society upon exiting the criminal justice system.

Health
11
Tensas Council on Aging Inc

The primary function of the Tensas Council on Aging, Inc. is to improve the quality of life for the parish's elderly and to provide services to the elderly as well as coordinate and monitor the services of other local agencies serving the…

Human Services
12
Arkansas Employment Career Center

Arkansas employment career centers' mission is to assist individuals with career opportunities through education and training. the primary target groups are individuals returning home from incarceration, veterans, homeless, and young…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mission Texarkana Inc; the most unlike its peers is Habitat for Humanity International Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
14/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TEXARKANA SPECIAL EDUCATION CENTER: $611,886 · Human ServicesTEXARKANA SPECIAL EDUCATION CENTERRunnin WJ Therapeutic Center Inc: $351,400 · Human ServicesRunnin WJ Therapeutic Center IncSenior Citizens Services of Texarkana: $306,901 · Human ServicesSenior Citizens Services of TexarkanaDomestic Violence Prevention Inc: $192,720 · Human ServicesDomestic Violence Prevention IncMISSION TEXARKANA INC: $166,310 · Human ServicesMISSION TEXARKANA INC+2 more: $29,720 · Human ServicesTEXARKANA RESOURCES FOR DISABLEDIN: $569,303 · EmploymentTEXARKANA RESO…LITERACY COUNCIL OF BOWIE & MILLER COUNTIES INC: $183,960 · OtherLITERACY COUNCIL OF BO…CADDO AREA COUNCIL INC OF THE BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $121,845 · OtherCADDO AREA COUNCIL INC…THE SALVATION ARMY: $107,016 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYPRIDE Academy: $50,832 · OtherPRIDE AcademyTEXARKANA AR POLICE DEPARTMEN: $50,650 · OtherTEXARKANA AR POLICE DE…SABINE VALLEY REGIONAL MHMR CENTER: $46,090 · OtherTEXARKANA REGIONAL ARTS & HUMANIT: $167,034 · OtherTEXARKANA REGIONAL ART…ARK-TEX COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS: $43,944 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOUNDATION INC: $38,652 · Other+3 more: $64,420 · Other+3 moreTEMPLE MEMORIAL PEDIATRIC CENTER INC: $368,129 · HealthTEMPLE MEMOR…SOUTHWEST ARKANSAS COUNSELING & MENTAL HEALTH CENTER INC: $122,300 · HealthSOUTHWEST AR…Randy Sams Outreach Shelter: $357,382 · ReligionRandy Sam…NORTHEAST TEXAS CASA INC: $306,600 · Civil RightsHarvest Texarkana Regional Food Bank Inc: $225,752 · Food & Nutrition
Human Services$1,658,937Employment$569,303Other$874,443Health$490,429Religion$357,382Civil Rights$306,600Food & Nutrition$225,752

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTEXARKANA SPECIAL EDUCATION CENTER: $611,886 over 9y, 1.5% of budgetTEXARKANA RESOURCES FOR DISABLEDIN: $569,303 over 9y, 3.9% of budgetTEMPLE MEMORIAL PEDIATRIC CENTER INC: $368,129 over 9y, 1.2% of budgetRandy Sams Outreach Shelter: $357,382 over 9y, 6.7% of budgetRunnin WJ Therapeutic Center Inc: $351,400 over 9y, 7.7% of budgetSenior Citizens Services of Texarkana: $306,901 over 9y, 2.5% of budgetNORTHEAST TEXAS CASA INC: $306,600 over 9y, 1.9% of budgetHarvest Texarkana Regional Food Bank Inc: $225,752 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetDomestic Violence Prevention Inc: $192,720 over 9y, 2.3% of budgetLITERACY COUNCIL OF BOWIE & MILLER COUNTIES INC: $183,960 over 9y, 23% of budgetTEXARKANA REGIONAL ARTS & HUMANIT: $167,034 over 8y, 3.3% of budgetMISSION TEXARKANA INC: $166,310 over 9y, 3.2% of budgetSOUTHWEST ARKANSAS COUNSELING & MENTAL HEALTH CENTER INC: $122,300 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetCADDO AREA COUNCIL INC OF THE BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $121,845 over 9y, 2.3% of budgetARK-TEX COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS: $43,944 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOUNDATION INC: $38,652 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFOR THE SAKE OF ONE: $22,920 over 3y, 3.3% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC: $22,548 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTEXARKANA SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $22,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetHabitat for Humanity of Texarkana Inc: $19,872 over 3y, 2.7% of budgetSHELTER AGENCIES FOR FAMILIES IN EAST TEXAS: $6,800 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TEXARKANA SPECIAL EDUCATION CENTER ↗
  • Who funds TEXARKANA RESOURCES FOR DISABLEDIN ↗
  • Who funds TEMPLE MEMORIAL PEDIATRIC CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Randy Sams Outreach Shelter ↗
  • Who funds Runnin WJ Therapeutic Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds Senior Citizens Services of Texarkana ↗
  • Who funds NORTHEAST TEXAS CASA INC ↗
  • Who funds Harvest Texarkana Regional Food Bank Inc ↗
  • Who funds Domestic Violence Prevention Inc ↗
  • Who funds LITERACY COUNCIL OF BOWIE & MILLER COUNTIES INC ↗
  • Who funds TEXARKANA REGIONAL ARTS & HUMANIT ↗
  • Who funds MISSION TEXARKANA INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHWEST ARKANSAS COUNSELING & MENTAL HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds CADDO AREA COUNCIL INC OF THE BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds ARK-TEX COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FOR THE SAKE OF ONE ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds TEXARKANA SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC ↗
  • Who funds Habitat for Humanity of Texarkana Inc ↗
  • Who funds SHELTER AGENCIES FOR FAMILIES IN EAST TEXAS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bobbie a Atkinson FoundationTX32.7× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bobbie a Atkinson Foundation · Ledwell Family Foundation · Patterson Troike Foundation Inc · Wayne H Garrison Charitable Tr · Cabe Cook Foundation · The Morriss Family Foundation · Christus Health · East Texas Communities Foundation · Cadence Bank Foundation · Yates Foundation · Vasco McCoy Jr Foundation · Kelley & Morgan Families Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization United Way of Greater Texarkana Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from United Way of Greater Texarkana Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on United Way of Greater Texarkana’s filings →

    More from the funding graph