· Private foundation
Yates Foundation
CHARITABLE FUNDING FOR HEALTH - INCLUDES PROVIDING FUNDS FOR HUMAN WELFARE AND EDUCATION.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k9 grants · $37k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| TRAHC | $10,000 |
| CASA of Northeast Texas | $7,500 |
| TOUGH KOOKIE FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| WOMEN FOR TEXAS A&M TEXARKANA | $5,000 |
| ALZHEIMER'S ALLIANCE TRI-STATE | $5,000 |
| HOSPICE OF TEXARKANA | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $4,000 |
| Texarkana Public Library Foundation | $2,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,000 |
| HARVEST TEXARKANA REGIONAL FOOD BANK | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–21, $185k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 16%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
15 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ACARKANSAS CHILDREN'S INC2× · 2022–2023 · $400k · revenue +40%
- TSTEXARKANA SPECIAL EDUCATION CENTER3× · 2019–2021 · $155k · revenue +4%
- TRTEXARKANA REGIONAL ARTS & HUMANIT8× · 2017–2025 · $75k · revenue +11%
Funded once
- TSThe Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Incgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $30k · revenue +47%
- OIOPPORTUNITIES INCone grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue 0%
- TSTEXARKANA SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INCgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $3k · revenue +92%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Established for the financial support of hospice of texarkana, inc.
Support Services for the elderly through nutritional assistance
The Texas Nonprofit Hospice Alliance (TNPHA) is a group of nonprofit hospices dedicated to sharing best practices and providing quality care for individuals with life-limiting illnesses.
Treatment of handicapped and disabled children and adults and providing job training for disabled persons. Providing activities for Alzheimer's Disease patients.
Treatment of physically handicapped
Fund pediatric cancer research in houston, texas
To fund neurofibromatosis research and education and to provide for support groups for those facing the illness.
The Hospice at the Texas Medical Center holds a freestanding 37 bed inpatient facility in the Texas Medical Center that is operated and managed by Houston Hospice.
To engage in fundraising, philanthropic development, community education and community activities in support of the mission of texas county memorial hospital.
TexProtects advances public policy and local implementation to strenghten families to prevent child abuse and neglect.
To improve the quality of life of those we serve regardless of financial circumstance.
To unite, represent, and support professionals who strive to improve the delivery, quality, and integrity of long term healthcare services.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Texarkana Special Education Center and the most unlike its peers is The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ARKANSAS CHILDREN'S INC ↗
- Who funds TEXARKANA SPECIAL EDUCATION CENTER ↗
- Who funds TEXARKANA REGIONAL ARTS & HUMANIT ↗
- Who funds TEMPLE MEMORIAL PEDIATRIC CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Runnin WJ Therapeutic Center Inc ↗
- Who funds The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds HOSPICE OF TEXARKANA ↗
- Who funds Tough Kookie Foundation ↗
- Who funds NORTHEAST TEXAS CASA INC ↗
- Who funds OPPORTUNITIES INC ↗
- Who funds TEXARKANA SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC ↗
- Who funds TEXARKANA PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CLAY EICHLER MEMORIAL FUND ↗
- Who funds Harvest Texarkana Regional Food Bank Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Cabe Cook Foundation · The Bobbie a Atkinson Foundation · Ledwell Family Foundation · United Way of Greater Texarkana Inc · Kelley & Morgan Families Foundation · The Morriss Family Foundation · Patterson Troike Foundation Inc · Vasco McCoy Jr Foundation · Wayne H Garrison Charitable Tr · Horace C Cabe Foundation · East Texas Communities Foundation · Arkansas Community Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Yates Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Yates Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Yates Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.