· Public charity
United Way of Greater Texarkana Inc
Provide annual support to 501(c) (3) member agencies through contributions received from the public.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 18 grants below total $490,063 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $507,330 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $17,267 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k3 grants · $23k
- $10k–50k13 grants · $337k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $131k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| OPPORTUNITIES INC | $67,056 |
| RESOURCES FOR THE DISABLED | $63,700 |
| TEMPLE MEMORIAL PEDIATRIC CEN | $41,184 |
| RANDY SAMS OUTREACH SHELTER | $39,360 |
| RUNNIN W J RANCH | $38,400 |
| SENIOR CITIZENS SERVICES | $33,870 |
| NORTHEAST TEXAS CASA INC | $33,600 |
| HARVEST TEXARKANA REGIONAL FO | $29,192 |
| DOMESTIC VIOLENCE PREVENTION INC | $21,120 |
| TRAHC Artsmart CAN | $20,909 |
| LITERACY COUNCIL OF BOWIE | $20,160 |
| TEXARKANA FRIENDSHIP CENTER | $18,612 |
| SALVATION ARMY | $13,724 |
| CADDO AREA COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS | $13,440 |
| SWACMHC Inc | $13,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $1.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 16%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
23 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TRTEXARKANA RESOURCES FOR DISABLEDIN9× · 2017–2025 · $569k · revenue +36%
- RSRandy Sams Outreach Shelter9× · 2017–2025 · $357k · revenue +16%
- SCSenior Citizens Services of Texarkana9× · 2017–2025 · $307k · revenue +8%
Funded once
- TSTEXARKANA SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INCgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $22k · revenue +271%
- SASHELTER AGENCIES FOR FAMILIES IN EAST TEXASone grant, 2021 · $7k · revenue -33%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Habilitation and residential services for adults with developmental disabilities
To provide the highest quality care, training and support to adults with special needs, giving them opportunities to succeed in life.
Treatment of handicapped and disabled children and adults and providing job training for disabled persons. Providing activities for Alzheimer's Disease patients.
Feed and house homeless families, counsel and help them prepare for job interviews, assist in completing forms for govt assistance, and provide rent/utilities assistance. Coordinate with local food bank.
A state of texas licensed foster care and adoption agency that identifies and provides approved healing foster homes for children.
Providing employment and job training service for mentally challenged individuals in southeast texas.
Atcic's mission is to improve the lives of people affected by behavioral health and developmental and/or intellectual challenges.
To provide family services and to provide residential child care for dependent children where there is a need to assist children and families disrupted by problems.
Grace House exists to rescue and advocate for women and families at risk.
Provides housing and spiritual development for Christians reintegrating into society upon exiting the criminal justice system.
The primary function of the Tensas Council on Aging, Inc. is to improve the quality of life for the parish's elderly and to provide services to the elderly as well as coordinate and monitor the services of other local agencies serving the…
Arkansas employment career centers' mission is to assist individuals with career opportunities through education and training. the primary target groups are individuals returning home from incarceration, veterans, homeless, and young…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mission Texarkana Inc and the most unlike its peers is Habitat for Humanity International Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds TEXARKANA SPECIAL EDUCATION CENTER ↗
- Who funds TEXARKANA RESOURCES FOR DISABLEDIN ↗
- Who funds TEMPLE MEMORIAL PEDIATRIC CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Randy Sams Outreach Shelter ↗
- Who funds Runnin WJ Therapeutic Center Inc ↗
- Who funds Senior Citizens Services of Texarkana ↗
- Who funds NORTHEAST TEXAS CASA INC ↗
- Who funds Harvest Texarkana Regional Food Bank Inc ↗
- Who funds Domestic Violence Prevention Inc ↗
- Who funds LITERACY COUNCIL OF BOWIE & MILLER COUNTIES INC ↗
- Who funds TEXARKANA REGIONAL ARTS & HUMANIT ↗
- Who funds MISSION TEXARKANA INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTHWEST ARKANSAS COUNSELING & MENTAL HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds CADDO AREA COUNCIL INC OF THE BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds ARK-TEX COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds FOR THE SAKE OF ONE ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds TEXARKANA SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC ↗
- Who funds Habitat for Humanity of Texarkana Inc ↗
- Who funds SHELTER AGENCIES FOR FAMILIES IN EAST TEXAS ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Bobbie a Atkinson Foundation · Ledwell Family Foundation · Patterson Troike Foundation Inc · Wayne H Garrison Charitable Tr · Cabe Cook Foundation · The Morriss Family Foundation · Christus Health · East Texas Communities Foundation · Cadence Bank Foundation · Yates Foundation · Vasco McCoy Jr Foundation · Kelley & Morgan Families Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization United Way of Greater Texarkana Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.